Literature DB >> 18719126

Dissecting the roles of MuB in Mu transposition: ATP regulation of DNA binding is not essential for target delivery.

Caterina T H Schweidenback1, Tania A Baker.   

Abstract

Collaboration between MuA transposase and its activator protein, MuB, is essential for properly regulated transposition. MuB activates MuA catalytic activity, selects target DNA, and stimulates transposition into the selected target site. Selection of appropriate target DNA requires ATP hydrolysis by the MuB ATPase. By fusing MuB to a site-specific DNA-binding protein, the Arc repressor, we generated a MuB variant that could select target DNA independently of ATP. This Arc-MuB fusion protein allowed us to test whether ATP binding and hydrolysis by MuB are necessary for stimulation of transposition into selected DNA, a process termed target delivery. We find that with the fusion proteins, MuB-dependent target delivery occurs efficiently under conditions where ATP hydrolysis is prevented by mutation or use of ADP. In contrast, no delivery was detected in the absence of nucleotide. These data indicate that the ATP- and MuA-regulated DNA-binding activity of MuB is not essential for target delivery but that activation of MuA by MuB strictly requires nucleotide-bound MuB. Furthermore, we find that the fusion protein directs transposition to regions of the DNA within 40-750 bp of its own binding site. Taken together, these results suggest that target delivery by MuB occurs as a consequence of the ability of MuB to stimulate MuA while simultaneously tethering MuA to a selected target DNA. This tethered-activator model provides an attractive explanation for other examples of protein-stimulated control of target site selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18719126      PMCID: PMC2527872          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0805868105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  45 in total

1.  Organization and dynamics of the Mu transpososome: recombination by communication between two active sites.

Authors:  T L Williams; E L Jackson; A Carritte; T A Baker
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  DNA transposition of bacteriophage Mu. A quantitative analysis of target site selection in vitro.

Authors:  Saija Haapa-Paananen; Hannu Rita; Harri Savilahti
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-11-07       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Regulation of RAG1/RAG2-mediated transposition by GTP and the C-terminal region of RAG2.

Authors:  Chia-Lun Tsai; David G Schatz
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 4.  The outs and ins of transposition: from mu to kangaroo.

Authors:  M Joan Curcio; Keith M Derbyshire
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 94.444

5.  Target immunity during Mu DNA transposition. Transpososome assembly and DNA looping enhance MuA-mediated disassembly of the MuB target complex.

Authors:  Eric C Greene; Kiyoshi Mizuuchi
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Alternative interactions between the Tn7 transposase and the Tn7 target DNA binding protein regulate target immunity and transposition.

Authors:  Zachary Skelding; Jennie Queen-Baker; Nancy L Craig
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-11-03       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  The same two monomers within a MuA tetramer provide the DDE domains for the strand cleavage and strand transfer steps of transposition.

Authors:  S Y Namgoong; R M Harshey
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Dynamics of a protein polymer: the assembly and disassembly pathways of the MuB transposition target complex.

Authors:  Eric C Greene; Kiyoshi Mizuuchi
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Targeting of the yeast Ty5 retrotransposon to silent chromatin is mediated by interactions between integrase and Sir4p.

Authors:  W Xie; X Gai; Y Zhu; D C Zappulla; R Sternglanz; D F Voytas
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Direct observation of single MuB polymers: evidence for a DNA-dependent conformational change for generating an active target complex.

Authors:  Eric C Greene; Kiyoshi Mizuuchi
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 17.970

View more
  4 in total

1.  Site-directed integration of transgenes: transposons revisited using DNA-binding-domain technologies.

Authors:  Marie-Véronique Demattei; Xavier Thomas; Elodie Carnus; Corinne Augé-Gouillou; Sylvaine Renault
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 2.  Transposable Phage Mu.

Authors:  Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2014-10

3.  E622, a miniature, virulence-associated mobile element.

Authors:  John Stavrinides; Morgan W B Kirzinger; Federico C Beasley; David S Guttman
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  A green fluorescent protein solubility screen in E. coli reveals domain boundaries of the GTP-binding domain in the P element transposase.

Authors:  Alex Sabogal; Donald C Rio
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.725

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.