T M E Davis1. 1. University of Western Australia, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, Fremantle Hospital, Fremantle, Australia. tdavis@cyllene.uwa.edu.au
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: The present review assesses published data relating to the main ethnic groups in the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), namely White Caucasians (WC; 82% of the cohort), Indian-Asians (IA; 10%) and Afro-Caribbeans (AC; 8%). RESULTS: At entry, the IA patients were younger than WC and AC patients, had a greater waist-hip ratio and more sedentary lifestyle, but had the lowest prevalence of hypertension and current smoking. The AC patients had the poorest glycaemic control but the most favourable lipid profile. The differences in modifiable vascular risk factors did not change over 9 years of follow-up. Consistent with UKPDS exclusion criteria, few patients had complications at baseline and there were no between-group differences. An interim analysis of incident fatal/non-fatal myocardial infarction (median follow-up 8.7 years) showed that the AC patients had a 70% lower risk than WC after adjustment for explanatory variables and that IA patients had a similar risk to WC. An analysis of complete albuminuria and renal failure data (median follow-up 15 years) showed that IA ethnicity was independently associated with an increased risk. CONCLUSIONS: There are sustained ethnic differences in the nature of diabetes, including vascular risk factors. AC patients had a substantially reduced risk of myocardial infarction that was not explained by their more favourable lipid profile, while IA patients were more likely to develop nephropathy than WC and IA patients. Longer follow-up is needed to determine whether the increased macrovascular risk observed in IA patients in other studies is replicated in the UKPDS cohort.
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: The present review assesses published data relating to the main ethnic groups in the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), namely White Caucasians (WC; 82% of the cohort), Indian-Asians (IA; 10%) and Afro-Caribbeans (AC; 8%). RESULTS: At entry, the IApatients were younger than WC and AC patients, had a greater waist-hip ratio and more sedentary lifestyle, but had the lowest prevalence of hypertension and current smoking. The AC patients had the poorest glycaemic control but the most favourable lipid profile. The differences in modifiable vascular risk factors did not change over 9 years of follow-up. Consistent with UKPDS exclusion criteria, few patients had complications at baseline and there were no between-group differences. An interim analysis of incident fatal/non-fatal myocardial infarction (median follow-up 8.7 years) showed that the AC patients had a 70% lower risk than WC after adjustment for explanatory variables and that IApatients had a similar risk to WC. An analysis of complete albuminuria and renal failure data (median follow-up 15 years) showed that IA ethnicity was independently associated with an increased risk. CONCLUSIONS: There are sustained ethnic differences in the nature of diabetes, including vascular risk factors. AC patients had a substantially reduced risk of myocardial infarction that was not explained by their more favourable lipid profile, while IApatients were more likely to develop nephropathy than WC and IApatients. Longer follow-up is needed to determine whether the increased macrovascular risk observed in IApatients in other studies is replicated in the UKPDS cohort.
Authors: Dahye Lee; Seulggie Choi; Jooyoung Chang; Young Jun Park; Jae Hyun Kim; Sang Min Park Journal: Endocrine Date: 2022-05-13 Impact factor: 3.925
Authors: Csaba P Kovesdy; Keith C Norris; L Ebony Boulware; Jun L Lu; Jennie Z Ma; Elani Streja; Miklos Z Molnar; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Eric R Londin; Margaret A Keller; Cathleen Maista; Gretchen Smith; Laura A Mamounas; Ran Zhang; Steven J Madore; Katrina Gwinn; Roderick A Corriveau Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-10-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rohini Mathur; Krishnan Bhaskaran; Emma Edwards; Helen Lee; Nishi Chaturvedi; Liam Smeeth; Ian Douglas Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Andrea D Short; Angela Holder; Simon Rothwell; Jonathan Massey; Rachel Scholey; Lorna J Kennedy; Brian Catchpole; William Er Ollier Journal: Canine Genet Epidemiol Date: 2014-07-07
Authors: Rohini Mathur; Ruth E Farmer; Sophie V Eastwood; Nish Chaturvedi; Ian Douglas; Liam Smeeth Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 11.069