Literature DB >> 18716765

Missing in action: the effect of obstacle position and size on avoidance while reaching.

Craig S Chapman1, Melvyn A Goodale.   

Abstract

When reaching to objects, our hand and arm rarely collide with non-target objects, even if our workspace is cluttered. The simplicity of these actions hides what must be a relatively sophisticated obstacle avoidance system. Recent studies on patients with optic ataxia and visual form agnosia have demonstrated that obstacle avoidance is an automatic process, likely governed by the dorsal stream (Schindler et al. 2004; Rice et al. 2006). The current study sought to quantify how normal participants react to changes in the size and position of non-target objects in and around their workspace. In the first experiment, 13 right-handed subjects performed reaches to a target strip in the presence of two non-target objects, which varied in depth and horizontal configuration. We found that objects with horizontal alignments that were asymmetric about midline created systematic deviations in reach trajectory away from midline, with participants seeming to maximize the distance away from the two objects. These deviations were significantly greater for objects nearer in depth and nearly disappeared when the objects were placed beyond the target strip. Accompanying this pattern of deviation were other significant obstructing effects whereby reaches were executed more slowly when objects were close in depth and close to the participants reaching (right) hand. In the second experiment, we varied the height of the two objects, as well as the depth. Object pairs were now both tall, both short, or one-short/one-tall. We replicated the significant depth effects of the first experiment, extending the finding to include sensitivity to the size of the objects. Here the obstructing effect caused by short objects was similar to tall objects when those objects were placed at the depth of the reach target, but less than the tall objects when placed at mid-reach. Taken together, these experiments suggest that humans possess a sophisticated obstacle avoidance system that is extremely sensitive and conservative in evaluating potential obstacles and adjusting the reach accordingly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18716765     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1499-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

1.  Mechanisms of selection for the control of hand action.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  The effects of abrupt onset of 2-D and 3-D distractors on prehension movements.

Authors:  U Castiello
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-08

3.  Automatic avoidance of obstacles is a dorsal stream function: evidence from optic ataxia.

Authors:  Igor Schindler; Nichola J Rice; Robert D McIntosh; Yves Rossetti; Alain Vighetto; A David Milner
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-06-20       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  The effects of landmarks on the performance of delayed and real-time pointing movements.

Authors:  Sukhvinder S Obhi; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Grasping a fruit: selection for action.

Authors:  U Castiello
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Hand deviations away from visual cues: indirect evidence for inhibition.

Authors:  L A Howard; S P Tipper
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Reaching between obstacles in spatial neglect and visual extinction.

Authors:  A David Milner; Robert D McIntosh
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.453

8.  Avoidance of obstacles in the absence of visual awareness.

Authors:  R D McIntosh; K I McClements; I Schindler; T P Cassidy; D Birchall; A D Milner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them.

Authors:  M A Goodale; A D Milner; L S Jakobson; D P Carey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects.

Authors:  M T Perenin; A Vighetto
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  19 in total

1.  "Real-time" obstacle avoidance in the absence of primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Christopher L Striemer; Craig S Chapman; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Use of early phase online vision for grip configuration is modulated according to movement duration in prehension.

Authors:  Takao Fukui; Toshio Inui
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Non-obstructing 3D depth cues influence reach-to-grasp kinematics.

Authors:  Christopher J Worssam; Lewis C Meade; Jason D Connolly
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  How do flanking objects affect reaching and grasping behavior in participants with macular disorders?

Authors:  Shahina Pardhan; Carmen Gonzalez-Alvarez; Ahalya Subramanian; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Naturalistic arm movements during obstacle avoidance in 3D and the identification of movement primitives.

Authors:  Britta Grimme; John Lipinski; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Eye-hand coordination: memory-guided grasping during obstacle avoidance.

Authors:  Hana H Abbas; Ryan W Langridge; Jonathan J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Effects of altered transport paths and intermediate movement goals on human grasp kinematics.

Authors:  Constanze Hesse; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Outsider interference: no role for motor lateralization in determining the strength of avoidance responses during reaching.

Authors:  Rudmer Menger; Stefan Van der Stigchel; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Reaching around obstacles accounts for uncertainty in coordinate transformations.

Authors:  Parisa Abedi Khoozani; Dimitris Voudouris; Gunnar Blohm; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Seeing all the obstacles in your way: the effect of visual feedback and visual feedback schedule on obstacle avoidance while reaching.

Authors:  Craig S Chapman; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.