Literature DB >> 18716568

Screening asymptomatic adolescent men for Chlamydia trachomatis in school-based health centers using urine-based nucleic acid amplification tests.

Alain Joffe1, Cornelis A Rietmeijer, Shang-En Chung, Nancy Willard, Johanna B Chapin, Laura V Lloyd, Gerry A Waterfield, Jonathan M Ellen, Charlotte Gaydos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Urine-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis using highly sensitive and specific nucleic acid amplification tests offers a unique opportunity to screen men attending school-based health centers.
METHODS: As part of a large multicenter chlamydia screening project in men, 1434 students were enrolled; 1090 in high schools in Baltimore and 344 middle and high-school students in Denver. Students were screened for chlamydia using urine-based nucleic acid amplification tests at well adolescent visits, acute care visits, or visits for other reasons, such as sports physicals. A self-administered survey to ascertain sexual risk behaviors was used. Data were analyzed separately for Baltimore and Denver, with univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: The overall prevalence in asymptomatic adolescent men was 6.8% (7.5% in Baltimore and 4.7% in Denver, P = n.s.). Students in Denver were older, more racially diverse, and more likely to have had intercourse in the previous 2 months than students in Baltimore. Students in Baltimore were more likely than those in Denver to have used a condom at last intercourse with casual and main partners. Among men in Denver but not Baltimore, condom use at last intercourse with both casual (OR 0.15, 95% CI, 0.03, 0.78) and main partners (OR 0.30, 95% CI, 0.10, 0.91) was protective against infection. The only risk factor for CT infection in Baltimore students was age (OR 1.47, 95% CI, 1.23, 1.75). In multivariate analysis that included age (as a continuous variable), race, history of an STI, any sex partner in the last 2 months, >1 sex partner in the past 12 months, a new partner in the last 2 months, and condom use with last main and last casual partner, age (adjusted odds ratio 1.34, 95% CI, 1.11, 1.62) and black race (adjusted odds ratio 2.37, 95% CI, 1.21, 4.63) were the only variables associated with testing chlamydia positive.
CONCLUSIONS: School-based health centers are important venues in which to perform urine-based screening for chlamydia in sexually active, asymptomatic males, especially in high prevalence communities, and such screening provides the opportunity to identify and treat substantial numbers of chlamydia infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18716568     DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181844f10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Dis        ISSN: 0148-5717            Impact factor:   2.830


  7 in total

1.  Bridging the gap: using school-based health services to improve chlamydia screening among young women.

Authors:  Rebecca A Braun; Jackie M Provost
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Internet-based screening for sexually transmitted infections to reach nonclinic populations in the community: risk factors for infection in men.

Authors:  Shua J Chai; Bulbulgul Aumakhan; Mathilda Barnes; Mary Jett-Goheen; Nicole Quinn; Patricia Agreda; Pamela Whittle; Terry Hogan; Wiley D Jenkins; Cornelis A Rietmeijer; Charlotte A Gaydos
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Relationships between perceived STD-related stigma, STD-related shame and STD screening among a household sample of adolescents.

Authors:  Shayna D Cunningham; Deanna L Kerrigan; Jacky M Jennings; Jonathan M Ellen
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2009-12

4.  The incidence and correlates of symptomatic and asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in selected populations in five countries.

Authors:  Roger Detels; Annette M Green; Jeffrey D Klausner; David Katzenstein; Charlotte Gaydos; H Hunter Handsfield; Willo Pequegnat; Kenneth Mayer; Tyler D Hartwell; Thomas C Quinn
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  "Pee-in-a-Pot": acceptability and uptake of on-site chlamydia screening in a student population in the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  Deirdre Vaughan; Emer O'Connell; Martin Cormican; Ruairi Brugha; Colette Faherty; Myles Balfe; Diarmuid O'Donovan
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.090

6.  Adolescents Accessing School-Based versus Family Planning Clinics: Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Testing and Treatment Outcomes.

Authors:  Meghna Raphael; Allyssa A Abacan; Peggy B Smith; Mariam R Chacko
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-29

Review 7.  Outreach for chlamydia and gonorrhoea screening: a systematic review of strategies and outcomes.

Authors:  Belinda Hengel; Muhammad S Jamil; Jacqueline K Mein; Lisa Maher; John M Kaldor; Rebecca J Guy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.