Literature DB >> 18716496

Sex differences in presentation, course, and management of low back pain in primary care.

Jean-François Chenot1, Annette Becker, Corinna Leonhardt, Stefan Keller, Norbert Donner-Banzhoff, Jan Hildebrandt, Heinz-Dieter Basler, Erika Baum, Michael M Kochen, Michael Pfingsten.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Epidemiologic surveys frequently show that women more often and are more affected by low back pain (LBP). The aim of this secondary analysis of a randomized controlled study was to explore whether presentation and course of LBP of women is different from men, and if sex affects the use of healthcare services for LBP.
METHODS: Data from 1342 [778 (58%) women] patients presenting with LBP in 116 general practices were collected. Patients completed standardized questionnaires before and after consultation and were contacted by phone 4 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months later for standardized interviews by study nurses. Functional capacity was assessed with Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire (HFAQ). Logistic regression models-adjusting for sociodemographic and disease-related data-were conducted to investigate the effect of sex for the use of healthcare services.
RESULTS: Women had on average a lower functional capacity at baseline and after 12 months. They were more likely to have recurrent or chronic LBP and to have a positive depression score. Being female was associated with a low functional capacity after 12 months (odds ratio: 1.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.2-2.3), but baseline functional capacity, chronicity, and depression were stronger predictors. In univariate analysis, women had a tendency of higher use of healthcare services. Those differences disappeared after adjustment. DISCUSSION: Our findings confirm that women are more severely affected by LBP and have a worse prognosis. Utilization of healthcare services cannot be fully explained by female sex, but rather by a higher impairment by back pain and pain in other parts of the body characteristic of the female population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18716496     DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31816ed948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  20 in total

1.  [Evaluation of a two-dimensional scale for the assessment of fear avoidance beliefs in elderly chronic low back pain patients].

Authors:  S Quint; M Raich; J Luckmann
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Chronic low back pain: course of disease from the patient's perspective.

Authors:  T Wolter; E Szabo; R Becker; M Mohadjer; S M Knoeller
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Sex differences in the change in health-related quality of life associated with low back pain.

Authors:  Rei Ono; Takahiro Higashi; Osamu Takahashi; Yasuharu Tokuda; Takuro Shimbo; Hiroyoshi Endo; Shigeaki Hinohara; Tsuguya Fukui; Shunichi Fukuhara
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Study of the information delivery by general practitioners and rheumatologists to patients with acute low back pain.

Authors:  Yves Henrotin; Dominique Moyse; Thierry Bazin; Christine Cedraschi; Bernard Duplan; Bernard Duquesnoy; Francoise Laroche; Jean-Pierre Valat; Marc Marty
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Sex differences among opioid-abusing patients with chronic pain in a clinical trial.

Authors:  Jeanne Manubay; Jesse Davidson; Suzanne Vosburg; Jermaine Jones; Sandra Comer; Maria Sullivan
Journal:  J Addict Med       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.702

6.  Sex-Related Pain Behavioral Differences following Unilateral NGF Injections in a Rat Model of Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Michael Syrett; Nicholas R Reed; William R Reed; Madison L Richey; Andrey Frolov; Joshua W Little
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-16

7.  'Progressive-onset' versus injury-associated discogenic low back pain: features of disc internal derangement in patients studied with provocation lumbar discography.

Authors:  W S Bartynski; L M Dejohn; W E Rothfus; P C Gerszten
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 1.610

8.  The clinical course of low back pain: a meta-analysis comparing outcomes in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies.

Authors:  Majid Artus; Danielle van der Windt; Kelvin P Jordan; Peter R Croft
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  The influence of self-reported leisure time physical activity and the body mass index on recovery from persistent back pain among men and women: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Tony Bohman; Lars Alfredsson; Johan Hallqvist; Eva Vingård; Eva Skillgate
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  A biopsychosocial profile of adult Canadians with and without chronic back disorders: a population-based analysis of the 2009-2010 Canadian Community Health Surveys.

Authors:  Brenna Bath; Catherine Trask; Jesse McCrosky; Josh Lawson
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.