S Quint1, M Raich, J Luckmann. 1. Institut für Medizinische Psychologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Karl v Frisch Str 4, 35032 Marburg, Deutschland. quints@staff.uni-marburg.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is evidence on the importance of fear avoidance beliefs (FAB) as prognostic risk factors in elderly patients suffering from chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, so far there is no validated German instrument for measuring FAB in elderly CLBP patients. The aim of the study presented was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Catastrophizing Avoidance Scale D-65+ (CAS-D-65+) within a population of elderly patients with CLBP. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with measurement repeated after 4 weeks in 68 CLBP patients aged 64 years and older. The CAS-D-65+ was analyzed performing an item analysis and retest reliability. For validation standardized assessment methods (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia [TSK], Photography of Daily Activity - Short electronic Version [Phoda-SeV], 5-Item-FAB, pain, disability, well-being and strain) were used. RESULTS: Internal consistency (Cronbach's α) ranged from 0.87 to 0.92 for total scale and from 0.71 to 0.89 for the sub-scales "catastrophizing" and "avoidance", retest reliability (r(tt)) ranged from 0.67 for the sub-scale "catastrophizing" to 0.70 for total scale and sub-scale "avoidance". The CAS-D-65+ showed moderate and strong effect sizes (Cohen's d) with other related FAB scales and external criteria. CONCLUSION: As shown in this study the CAS-D-65+ is a reliable and a valid instrument for the assessment of FAB in older patients with CLBP.
BACKGROUND: There is evidence on the importance of fear avoidance beliefs (FAB) as prognostic risk factors in elderly patients suffering from chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, so far there is no validated German instrument for measuring FAB in elderly CLBP patients. The aim of the study presented was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Catastrophizing Avoidance Scale D-65+ (CAS-D-65+) within a population of elderly patients with CLBP. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with measurement repeated after 4 weeks in 68 CLBP patients aged 64 years and older. The CAS-D-65+ was analyzed performing an item analysis and retest reliability. For validation standardized assessment methods (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia [TSK], Photography of Daily Activity - Short electronic Version [Phoda-SeV], 5-Item-FAB, pain, disability, well-being and strain) were used. RESULTS: Internal consistency (Cronbach's α) ranged from 0.87 to 0.92 for total scale and from 0.71 to 0.89 for the sub-scales "catastrophizing" and "avoidance", retest reliability (r(tt)) ranged from 0.67 for the sub-scale "catastrophizing" to 0.70 for total scale and sub-scale "avoidance". The CAS-D-65+ showed moderate and strong effect sizes (Cohen's d) with other related FAB scales and external criteria. CONCLUSION: As shown in this study the CAS-D-65+ is a reliable and a valid instrument for the assessment of FAB in older patients with CLBP.
Authors: Maaike Leeuw; Mariëlle E J B Goossens; Gerard J P van Breukelen; Katja Boersma; Johan W S Vlaeyen Journal: J Pain Date: 2007-07-13 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: H D Basler; R Bloem; H R Casser; H U Gerbershagen; N Griessinger; U Hankemeier; S Hesselbarth; S Lautenbacher; T Nikolaus; W Richter; C Schröter; L Weiss Journal: Schmerz Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 1.107
Authors: Maaike Leeuw; Mariëlle E J B Goossens; Gerard J P van Breukelen; Jeroen R de Jong; Peter H T G Heuts; Rob J E M Smeets; Albere J A Köke; Johan W S Vlaeyen Journal: Pain Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 6.961