OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a dedicated coronary CT protocol provides adequate contrast enhancement and artifact-free depiction of coronary, pulmonary, and aortic circulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dedicated coronary 64-MDCT data sets of 50 patients (27 men; mean age, 54 +/- 12.4 years) consecutively admitted from the emergency department with suspected acute coronary syndrome were analyzed. Two independent observers graded overall coronary arterial image quality and qualitative and quantitative contrast opacification, motion, and streak artifacts within the pulmonary arteries and aorta. RESULTS: Coronary image quality was excellent in 48 patients (96%) and moderate in two patients (4%). Eleven left main and 22 left upper lobar pulmonary arteries were not visualized. Qualitative evaluation showed pulmonary arterial tree opacification to be excellent except for the right and left lower lateral and posterior segmental branches (52-54% rate of poor opacification). Quantitative evaluation showed four central (8%), six lobar (8%), and 206 segmental (29%) branches had poor contrast opacification (< 200 HU). Nineteen right upper lobar arteries (38%) were slightly and one was severely affected by streak artifact. At the segmental pulmonary artery level, marked differences in contrast enhancement were detected between the upper (292 +/- 72 HU) and both the middle (249 +/- 85 HU) and the lower lobes (248 +/- 76 HU) (p < 0.01). Mean aortic opacification was 300 +/- 34 HU with excellent contrast homogeneity without severe motion or streak artifacts. CONCLUSION: In the evaluation of patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected acute coronary syndrome, a dedicated coronary CT protocol enables excellent assessment of the coronary arteries and proximal ascending aorta but does not depict the pulmonary vasculature well enough for exclusion of pulmonary embolism.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a dedicated coronary CT protocol provides adequate contrast enhancement and artifact-free depiction of coronary, pulmonary, and aortic circulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dedicated coronary 64-MDCT data sets of 50 patients (27 men; mean age, 54 +/- 12.4 years) consecutively admitted from the emergency department with suspected acute coronary syndrome were analyzed. Two independent observers graded overall coronary arterial image quality and qualitative and quantitative contrast opacification, motion, and streak artifacts within the pulmonary arteries and aorta. RESULTS: Coronary image quality was excellent in 48 patients (96%) and moderate in two patients (4%). Eleven left main and 22 left upper lobar pulmonary arteries were not visualized. Qualitative evaluation showed pulmonary arterial tree opacification to be excellent except for the right and left lower lateral and posterior segmental branches (52-54% rate of poor opacification). Quantitative evaluation showed four central (8%), six lobar (8%), and 206 segmental (29%) branches had poor contrast opacification (< 200 HU). Nineteen right upper lobar arteries (38%) were slightly and one was severely affected by streak artifact. At the segmental pulmonary artery level, marked differences in contrast enhancement were detected between the upper (292 +/- 72 HU) and both the middle (249 +/- 85 HU) and the lower lobes (248 +/- 76 HU) (p < 0.01). Mean aortic opacification was 300 +/- 34 HU with excellent contrast homogeneity without severe motion or streak artifacts. CONCLUSION: In the evaluation of patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected acute coronary syndrome, a dedicated coronary CT protocol enables excellent assessment of the coronary arteries and proximal ascending aorta but does not depict the pulmonary vasculature well enough for exclusion of pulmonary embolism.
Authors: A Limkakeng; W B Gibler; C Pollack; J W Hoekstra; F Sites; F S Shofer; B Tiffany; E Wilke; J E Hollander Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: T H Lee; G W Rouan; M C Weisberg; D A Brand; D Acampora; C Stasiulewicz; J Walshon; G Terranova; L Gottlieb; B Goldstein-Wayne Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1987-08-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Judd E Hollander; Keara L Sease; Dina M Sparano; Frank D Sites; Frances S Shofer; William G Baxt Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Francis M Fesmire; Alan D Hughes; Edward P Fody; Alan P Jackson; Connie E Fesmire; Mark A Gilbert; Paul K Stout; James F Wojcik; David R Wharton; James H Creel Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Conrad Wittram; Michael M Maher; Albert J Yoo; Mannudeep K Kalra; Jo-Anne O Shepard; Theresa C McLoud Journal: Radiographics Date: 2004 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Ralf W Bauer; Sebastian Kramer; Matthias Renker; Boris Schell; Maya Christina Larson; Martin Beeres; Thomas Lehnert; Volkmar Jacobi; Thomas J Vogl; Josef Matthias Kerl Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-05-27 Impact factor: 5.315