Literature DB >> 18715694

Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence.

Jay D Raman1, Aditya Bagrodia, Jeffrey A Cadeddu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent reports have suggested that single-port or single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is technically feasible.
OBJECTIVE: To present a comparison between SILS and conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy with respect to perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a case-control study comparing 11 SILS nephrectomies (cases) and 22 conventional laparoscopic nephrectomies (controls) performed from September 2004 to April 2008. The control group was matched in a 2:1 ratio to SILS cases with respect to patient age, surgical indication, and tumor size. INTERVENTION: A single surgeon performed all SILS nephrectomy cases using three adjacent 5-mm trocars inserted through a single 2.5-cm periumbilical incision. MEASUREMENTS: Demographics, operative time, blood loss, perioperative complications, transfusion requirement, decrease in serum hemoglobin, analgesic requirement, length of stay, and final pathology were compared. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Mean patient age was 53 yr for both groups, with more females in the SILS cohort (82% vs 41%). Nephrectomy was performed for benign disease in 45% of the cases. Median tumor size was 5.5 cm for both groups, and all but one suspected malignancy was renal cell carcinoma on final pathology. There was no difference between SILS and conventional laparoscopy cases in median operative time (122 min vs 125 min, p=0.78), percent decrease from preoperative hemoglobin (14.1% vs 15.8%, p=0.52), analgesic use (8 morphine equivalents vs 15 morphine equivalents, p=0.69), length of stay (49 h vs. 53 h, p=0.44), or complication rate (0% for both). The SILS group did have a lower recorded median estimated blood loss (20 ml vs 100ml, p=0.001). This study is retrospective and is susceptible to all limitations and biases inherent in such a design.
CONCLUSIONS: SILS nephrectomy is feasible with perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence comparable to conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy. Although SILS may offer a subjective cosmetic advantage, prospective comparison is needed to more clearly define its role.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18715694     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.08.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  88 in total

1.  Laparoendoscopic single-site totally extraperitoneal adult inguinal hernia repair: initial 100 patients.

Authors:  Shiu-Dong Chung; Chao-Yuan Huang; Shuo-Meng Wang; Shun-Fa Hung; Yao-Chou Tsai; Shih-Chieh Chueh; Hong-Jeng Yu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: new minimally invasive surgery come of age.

Authors:  Chen Huang; Ren-Xiang Huang; Zheng-Jun Qiu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Pure single-port laparoscopic surgery or mix of techniques?

Authors:  Evangelos Liatsikos; Iason Kyriazis; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Minh Do; Anja Dietel; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Novice surgeons versus experienced surgeons in laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery: a comparison of performances in a surgical simulator.

Authors:  Leonidas Alevizos; Willem Brinkman; Abe Fingerhut; Jack Jakimowicz; Emmanuel Leandros
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Surgery: are we likely to see more of LESS in urological surgery?

Authors:  Aditya Bagrodia; Jeffrey A Cadeddu
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  New trends in minimally invasive urological surgery: what is beyond the robot?

Authors:  Salvatore Micali; Giovannalberto Pini; Dogu Teber; Maria Chiara Sighinolfi; Stefano De Stefani; Giampaolo Bianchi; Jens Rassweiler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  The role of single-incision laparoscopic surgery in abdominal and pelvic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kamran Ahmed; Tim T Wang; Vanash M Patel; Kamal Nagpal; James Clark; Mariam Ali; Samer Deeba; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou; Paraskevas Paraskeva
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Technical difficulties of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy: comparison with conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

Authors:  Masaru Ishida; Akira Miyajima; Toshikazu Takeda; Masanori Hasegawa; Eiji Kikuchi; Mototsugu Oya
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery: comparison of surgical port performance in a surgical simulator with novices.

Authors:  Bernadette Brown-Clerk; Adam E de Laveaga; Chad A LaGrange; Laura M Wirth; Bethany R Lowndes; M Susan Hallbeck
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  A randomized, prospective, parallel group study of laparoscopic versus laparoendoscopic single site donor nephrectomy for kidney donation.

Authors:  M J Aull; C Afaneh; M Charlton; D Serur; M Douglas; P J Christos; S Kapur; J J Del Pizzo
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.