Literature DB >> 18713919

A comparison of a silicone wire-reinforced tube with the Parker and polyvinyl chloride tubes for tracheal intubation through an intubating laryngeal mask airway in patients with normal airways undergoing general anesthesia.

Ghassan E Kanazi1, Mohammed El-Khatib, Viviane G Nasr, Romeo Kaddoum, Achir Al-Alami, Anis S Baraka, Chakib M Ayoub.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) is used in the management of difficult intubation. Usually, a silicone wire-reinforced tube is inserted for tracheal intubation. Because the silicone wire-reinforced tube is expensive, alternatives, such as polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and posterior beveled Parker tubes, are worth considering. We compared the blind intubation success rates among the silicone wire-reinforced tube, the Parker tube, and the PVC tube, and identified laryngeal structures preventing tracheal intubations through the ILMA.
METHODS: Sixty-three adult patients were randomized into three groups: Group I (n = 20) silicone wire-reinforced tube, Group II (n = 21) Parker tube, and Group III (n = 22) PVC tube. Demographic and clinical continuous data were compared with the analysis of variance with the Scheffé test for post hoc analysis. Frequencies and percentages were compared with the chi(2) test.
RESULTS: Tracheal intubation was successful from the first attempt in 18 of 20 patients in Group I (silicone wire-reinforced tube), which was significantly higher than the success rate in either Group II (12 of 22 patients) (Parker tube) or Group III (10 of 21 patients) (PVC tube). With clockwise or anticlockwise rotation of the tracheal tube, the number of successful intubations did not change in Group I, but it increased to 19 of 22 patients in Group II and to 12 of 21 patients in Group III. The rate of successful intubation between patients in Group I (90%) and Group II (86%) was not significantly different after manipulation of the tracheal tube (P = 0.72). However, the rate of successful tracheal intubations in patients of Group III (57%) was significantly lower in comparison to patients in both Group I (P = 0.02) and Group II (P = 0.03). In 3 of the 22 patients of Group II and in 9 of the 21 patients of Group III in whom blind intubation was not possible, the obstruction was due to the epiglottis tubercule.
CONCLUSIONS: Manipulation improved the success rate of intubation with the Parker tube through the ILMA rendering it a possible alternative to the silicone wire-reinforced tube.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18713919     DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31817ef110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  10 in total

1.  A comparison of conventional endotracheal tube with silicone wire-reinforced tracheal tube for intubation through intubating laryngeal mask airway.

Authors:  Veena R Shah; Guruprasad P Bhosale; Tanu Mehta; Geeta P Parikh
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2014-04

2.  Intubation Success through I-Gel® and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway® Using Flexible Silicone Tubes: A Randomised Noninferiority Trial.

Authors:  Latha Naik; Neerja Bhardwaj; Indu Mohini Sen; Rakesh V Sondekoppam
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2016-07-10

3.  I-Gel as an intubation conduit: Comparison of three different types of endotracheal tubes.

Authors:  Nitin Choudhary; Abhijit Kumar; Amit Kohli; Sonia Wadhawan; Poonam Bhadoria
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2019-03

4.  A study to evaluate and compare intubating laryngeal mask airway and air-Q intubating laryngeal airway for intubation using Parker Flex Tip tube.

Authors:  Teena Bansal; Suresh Singhal; Himani Mittal
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2020-02-04

5.  A study to compare Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway with Ambu Auragain laryngeal mask for blind tracheal intubation using Parker flex tip tube.

Authors:  Jatin Lal; Teena Bansal; Somesh Somesh; Mamta Jain
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-06

6.  Comparison between Air Q and intubating laryngeal mask airway as intubation conduits in patients with simulated fixed cervical spine: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Renu Bala; Jasmine Basumatary; Priyanka Bansal
Journal:  Med Gas Res       Date:  2023 Jan-Mar

7.  Endotracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway (LMA-Fastrach™): A randomized study of LMA- Fastrach™ wire-reinforced silicone endotracheal tube versus conventional polyvinyl chloride tracheal tube.

Authors:  Megha U Sharma; Satinder Gombar; Kanti K Gombar; Baljit Singh; Nidhi Bhatia
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2013-01

8.  Comparison of blind intubation through supraglottic devices and direct laryngoscopy by novices: a simulation manikin study.

Authors:  Young Yong Kim; Gu Hyun Kang; Won Hee Kim; Hyun Young Choi; Yong Soo Jang; Young Jae Lee; Jae Guk Kim; Hyeongtae Kim; Gyoung Yong Kim
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2016-06-30

9.  Tracheal intubation through laryngeal mask airway CTrach™ with polyvinyl chloride tube: Comparison between two orientations of the tracheal tube.

Authors:  Karri Pavani; Handattu Mahabaleswara Krishna; Joseph Nandhini
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

10.  Comparison of conventional with Parker flex-tip tracheal tube for intubation through air-Q intubating laryngeal airway.

Authors:  Jatin Lal; Teena Bansal; Gaurav Dhawan; Susheela Taxak; Manu Smriti; Jyoti Sharma; Deepali Thaper
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-02-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.