OBJECTIVE: In late 2006, our hospital implemented use of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-G) assay, a whole-blood interferon-gamma release assay, for detection of tuberculosis infection. All newly hired healthcare workers (HCWs) with positive Mantoux tuberculin skin test (TST) results were routinely tested with the QFT-G assay, to take advantage of its higher specificity. We then undertook a quality assurance review to evaluate the QFT-G test results in HCWs with multiple risk factors for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). METHODS: The clinical records for TST-positive HCWs tested with the QFT-G assay were reviewed. HCWs with 2 or more risk factors commonly associated with LTBI were classified as "increased risk" (IR). IR HCWs who had negative QFT-G test results underwent repeat QFT-G testing and were offered testing with a different interferon-gamma release assay (T-SPOT.TB) and with extended T cell stimulation assays. RESULTS: Of 143 TST-positive HCWs tested with the QFT-G assay, 26 (18%) had positive results, 115 (81%) had negative results, and 2 (1%) had indeterminate results. Of 82 IR HCWs, 23 (28%) had positive QFT-G test results, and 57 (70%) had negative results. Of the 57 IR HCWs with negative results, 43 underwent repeat QFT-G testing: 41 had negative results again, and 2 had positive results. These 43 HCWs were also offered additional testing with the T-SPOT.TB diagnostic, and 36 consented: 31/36 tested negative, and 5/36 tested positive. Extended assays using the antigens ESAT-6 and CFP-10 confirmed the positive results detected by the overnight assays and yielded positive results for an additional 7/36 (19%) of individuals; strikingly, all 36 HCWs had strongly positive test results with assays using purified protein derivative. CONCLUSIONS: The extreme discordance between the results of our clinical diagnostic algorithm and the results of QFT-G testing raises concern about the sensitivity of the QFT-G assay for detection of LTBI in our HCWs. Results of extended stimulation assays suggest that many of our IR HCWs have indeed been sensitized to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. It is possible that the QFT-G assay identifies those at higher reactivation risk rather than all previously infected, but, in the absence of long-term follow-up data, we should interpret negative QFT-G results with some caution.
OBJECTIVE: In late 2006, our hospital implemented use of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-G) assay, a whole-blood interferon-gamma release assay, for detection of tuberculosis infection. All newly hired healthcare workers (HCWs) with positive Mantoux tuberculin skin test (TST) results were routinely tested with the QFT-G assay, to take advantage of its higher specificity. We then undertook a quality assurance review to evaluate the QFT-G test results in HCWs with multiple risk factors for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). METHODS: The clinical records for TST-positive HCWs tested with the QFT-G assay were reviewed. HCWs with 2 or more risk factors commonly associated with LTBI were classified as "increased risk" (IR). IR HCWs who had negative QFT-G test results underwent repeat QFT-G testing and were offered testing with a different interferon-gamma release assay (T-SPOT.TB) and with extended T cell stimulation assays. RESULTS: Of 143 TST-positive HCWs tested with the QFT-G assay, 26 (18%) had positive results, 115 (81%) had negative results, and 2 (1%) had indeterminate results. Of 82 IR HCWs, 23 (28%) had positive QFT-G test results, and 57 (70%) had negative results. Of the 57 IR HCWs with negative results, 43 underwent repeat QFT-G testing: 41 had negative results again, and 2 had positive results. These 43 HCWs were also offered additional testing with the T-SPOT.TB diagnostic, and 36 consented: 31/36 tested negative, and 5/36 tested positive. Extended assays using the antigens ESAT-6 and CFP-10 confirmed the positive results detected by the overnight assays and yielded positive results for an additional 7/36 (19%) of individuals; strikingly, all 36 HCWs had strongly positive test results with assays using purified protein derivative. CONCLUSIONS: The extreme discordance between the results of our clinical diagnostic algorithm and the results of QFT-G testing raises concern about the sensitivity of the QFT-G assay for detection of LTBI in our HCWs. Results of extended stimulation assays suggest that many of our IR HCWs have indeed been sensitized to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. It is possible that the QFT-G assay identifies those at higher reactivation risk rather than all previously infected, but, in the absence of long-term follow-up data, we should interpret negative QFT-G results with some caution.
Authors: Inger Brock; Karin Weldingh; Troels Lillebaek; Frank Follmann; Peter Andersen Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2004-04-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Gerald H Mazurek; Margan J Zajdowicz; Arlene L Hankinson; Daniel J Costigan; Sean R Toney; James S Rothel; Laura J Daniels; F Brian Pascual; Nong Shang; Lisa W Keep; Philip A LoBue Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2007-08-24 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Luca Richeldi; Katie Ewer; Monica Losi; Barbara M Bergamini; Pietro Roversi; Jonathan Deeks; Leonardo M Fabbri; Ajit Lalvani Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2004-05-06 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Benjamin D Fox; Mordechai R Kramer; Zohar Mor; Rachel Preiss; Victoria Rusanov; Leonardo Fuks; Nir Peled; Ilanit Haim; Meir Raz; David Shitrit Journal: Lung Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 2.584
Authors: Felix C Ringshausen; Albert Nienhaus; José Torres Costa; Heiko Knoop; Stephan Schlösser; Gerhard Schultze-Werninghaus; Gernot Rohde Journal: Clin Vaccine Immunol Date: 2011-05-18
Authors: Patricio Escalante; Kirstin J Kooda; Rizwana Khan; San San Aye; Stratos Christianakis; Daniel G Arkfeld; Glenn R Ehresmann; Jens J Kort; Brenda E Jones Journal: Lung Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 2.584
Authors: Madhukar Pai; Claudia M Denkinger; Sandra V Kik; Molebogeng X Rangaka; Alice Zwerling; Olivia Oxlade; John Z Metcalfe; Adithya Cattamanchi; David W Dowdy; Keertan Dheda; Niaz Banaei Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: John Z Metcalfe; Adithya Cattamanchi; Charles E McCulloch; Justin D Lew; Ngan P Ha; Edward A Graviss Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2012-10-26 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: William C Whitworth; Lanette R Hamilton; Donald J Goodwin; Carlos Barrera; Kevin B West; Laura Racster; Laura J Daniels; Stella O Chuke; Brandon H Campbell; Jamaria Bohanon; Atheer T Jaffar; Wanzer Drane; David Maserang; Gerald H Mazurek Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-09-06 Impact factor: 3.240