Literature DB >> 4065773

A prospective study of the effect of a shock-absorbing orthotic device on the incidence of stress fractures in military recruits.

C Milgrom, M Giladi, H Kashtan, A Simkin, R Chisin, J Margulies, R Steinberg, Z Aharonson, M Stein.   

Abstract

In a prospective study of stress fractures the hypothesis that a shock-absorbing orthotic device worn within military boots could lessen the incidence of stress fractures was tested. The incidence of metatarsal, tibial, and femoral stress fractures was lower in the orthotic group, but only the latter difference was statistically significant. The time of onset and the location of stress fractures between orthotic and nonorthotic users did not differ. These findings suggest that the incidence of femoral stress fractures, which are the most dangerous type of stress fracture because of their high risk of developing into displaced fractures, can be reduced by an orthotic device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4065773     DOI: 10.1177/107110078500600209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle        ISSN: 0198-0211


  16 in total

Review 1.  Is it possible to prevent sports injuries? Review of controlled clinical trials and recommendations for future work.

Authors:  J Parkkari; U M Kujala; P Kannus
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Interventions to prevent sports related injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Mari Leppänen; Sari Aaltonen; Jari Parkkari; Ari Heinonen; Urho M Kujala
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  The shock-absorbing effect of soles and insoles.

Authors:  B Rööser; R Ekbladh; L Lidgren
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Risk factors for stress fractures.

Authors:  K Bennell; G Matheson; W Meeuwisse; P Brukner
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Increased plantar force and impulse in American football players with high arch compared to normal arch.

Authors:  Daniel W Carson; Gregory D Myer; Timothy E Hewett; Robert S Heidt; Kevin R Ford
Journal:  Foot (Edinb)       Date:  2012-11-08

Review 6.  Physiological employment standards IV: integration of women in combat units physiological and medical considerations.

Authors:  Yoram Epstein; Ran Yanovich; Daniel S Moran; Yuval Heled
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  Interventions for preventing and treating stress fractures and stress reactions of bone of the lower limbs in young adults.

Authors:  K Rome; H H G Handoll; R Ashford
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-04-18

Review 8.  Achilles tendon injuries in athletes.

Authors:  M Kvist
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Tibial stress injuries. An aetiological review for the purposes of guiding management.

Authors:  B R Beck
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Does shoe insole modification prevent stress fractures? A systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca A Snyder; Joseph P DeAngelis; Michael C Koester; Kurt P Spindler; Warren R Dunn
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2009-06-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.