Quality of life and symptomatic response to gastric neurostimulation for gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND: Gastroparesis can be a difficult problem with patients suffering from nausea, vomiting, bloating, and pain intractable to medical management. Gastric neurostimulation has been developed as an adjunctive treatment for patients with diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis unresponsive to pharmacologic and dietary treatment. The purpose of this study is to report symptomatic and quality-of-life response to gastric neurostimulation.
METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional review board, and patients had informed consent. The gastric neurostimulation device (Enterra therapy, Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) is approved by the Food and Drug Administration under the Humanitarian Device Exemption. Candidates for placement were patients with either idiopathic or diabetic gastroparesis who had symptomatic failure to dietary changes and to prokinetic and antiemetic drugs. Before placement, the patients' symptoms were recorded, and patients completed the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS, three domains: dyspeptic syndrome, indigestion syndrome, and bowel dysfunction syndrome) and the Short Form-36 (SF-36, eight domains: physical functioning, role-physical, role-emotional, bodily pain, vitality, mental health, social functioning, general health, plus a health transition item). The device was surgically placed using a hybrid laparoscopic/open technique. Patients were followed and adjustments made on the device until satisfactory symptom control was achieved. At that time, patients completed both the GSRS and SF-36, and comparisons were made to preoperative values.
RESULTS: Forty-two patients had the device placed, 29 women, aged 41 (SD +14) years, 24 diabetic patients, 17 idiopathic patients, one postgastrectomy patient. Median follow-up was 12 months (range 1-42 months). There was a 2% immediate postoperative morbidity rate and 7% long-term morbidity rate (device extrusion). Thirty-one patients (74%) responded to gastric neurostimulation of variable degrees. Eleven patients had no response or had worsening symptoms. Of the patients who responded, there were statistically significant improvements in all three domains of the GSRS. Median scores (with interquartile ranges): dyspeptic syndrome, 9 (7-11.5) to 4 (2.5-6), p = 0.02; indigestion syndrome, 5 (2-7) to 4 (0-5), p = 0.05; bowel dysfunction syndrome, 3 (2-3) to 1 (0-1), p = 0.01. In the SF-36, there were statistically significant improvement in the health transition item, 4 (4-5) to 1.5 (1-3), p = 0.01; and social functioning domain, 25 (12.5-62.5) to 75 (50-87.5), p = 0.03.
CONCLUSIONS: Three quarters of gastroparesis patients responded to gastric neurostimulation to variable degrees. Gastrointestinal-specific symptoms are improved in responders. Patients felt that there health and social functioning (SF) improved, although there was no significant difference in the other domains. These results are encouraging considering that these patients had intractable symptoms with no other effective treatments available.