Literature DB >> 18080765

Predictive factors for clinical improvement with Enterra gastric electric stimulation treatment for refractory gastroparesis.

Jennifer L Maranki1, Vanessa Lytes, John E Meilahn, Sean Harbison, Frank K Friedenberg, Robert S Fisher, Henry P Parkman.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The objectives of this study were to determine the clinical response to Enterra gastric electric stimulation (GES) in patients with refractory gastroparesis and to determine factors associated with a favorable response.
METHODS: This study was conducted in patients undergoing Enterra GES for refractory gastroparesis. Symptoms were scored before and after GES implantation using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) with additional questions about abdominal pain and global clinical response.
RESULTS: During an 18-month period, 29 patients underwent GES implantation. Follow-up data were available for 28 patients, with average follow-up of 148 days. At follow-up, 14 of 28 patients felt improved, 8 remained the same, and 6 worsened. The overall GCSI significantly decreased with improvement in the nausea/vomiting subscore and the post-prandial subscore, but no improvement in the bloating subscore or abdominal pain. The decrease in GCSI was greater for diabetic patients than idiopathic patients. Patients with main symptom of nausea/vomiting had a greater improvement than patients with the main symptom of abdominal pain. Patients taking narcotic analgesics at the time of implant had a poorer response compared to patients who were not.
CONCLUSIONS: GES resulted in clinical improvement in 50% of patients with refractory gastroparesis. Three clinical parameters were associated with a favorable clinical response: (1) diabetic rather than idiopathic gastroparesis, (2) nausea/vomiting rather than abdominal pain as the primary symptom, and (3) independence from narcotic analgesics prior to stimulator implantation. Knowledge of these three factors may allow improved patient selection for GES.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18080765      PMCID: PMC3579617          DOI: 10.1007/s10620-007-0124-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  17 in total

1.  Chronic gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis reduces the use of prokinetic and/or antiemetic medications and the need for hospitalizations.

Authors:  Zhiyue Lin; Chris McElhinney; Irene Sarosiek; Jameson Forster; Richard McCallum
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Gastric pacing improves emptying and symptoms in patients with gastroparesis.

Authors:  R W McCallum; J D Chen; Z Lin; B D Schirmer; R D Williams; R A Ross
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Is gastric electrical stimulation superior to standard pharmacologic therapy in improving GI symptoms, healthcare resources, and long-term health care benefits?

Authors:  T F Cutts; J Luo; W Starkebaum; H Rashed; T L Abell
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  Clinical response to gastric electrical stimulation in patients with postsurgical gastroparesis.

Authors:  Richard McCallum; Zhiyue Lin; Paul Wetzel; Irene Sarosiek; Jameson Forster
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  Absence of the interstitial cells of Cajal in patients with gastroparesis and correlation with clinical findings.

Authors:  Jameson Forster; Ivan Damjanov; Zhiyue Lin; Irene Sarosiek; Paul Wetzel; Richard W McCallum
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Pilot study on gastric electrical stimulation on surgery-associated gastroparesis: long-term outcome.

Authors:  Benton Oubre; Jean Luo; Amar Al-Juburi; Guy Voeller; Babajide Familoni; Thomas L Abell
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 0.954

7.  Temporary gastric electrical stimulation with orally or PEG-placed electrodes in patients with drug refractory gastroparesis.

Authors:  Srinivasa Ayinala; Oscar Batista; Amit Goyal; Amar Al-Juburi; Nighat Abidi; Babajide Familoni; Thomas Abell
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 8.  A systematic review of surgical therapy for gastroparesis.

Authors:  Michael P Jones; Kalyani Maganti
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI): development and validation of a patient reported assessment of severity of gastroparesis symptoms.

Authors:  Dennis A Revicki; Anne M Rentz; Dominique Dubois; Peter Kahrilas; Vincenzo Stanghellini; Nicholas J Talley; Jan Tack
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis improves nutritional parameters at short, intermediate, and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Thomas Abell; Jean Lou; Mumtaz Tabbaa; Oscar Batista; Scott Malinowski; Amar Al-Juburi
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  45 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic and Surgical Treatments for Gastroparesis: What to Do and Whom to Treat?

Authors:  Roman V Petrov; Charles T Bakhos; Abbas E Abbas; Zubair Malik; Henry P Parkman
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 2.  Idiopathic gastroparesis.

Authors:  Henry P Parkman
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.806

3.  Efficacy of gastric electrical stimulation in improving functional vomiting in patients with normal gastric emptying.

Authors:  Savio C Reddymasu; Zhiyue Lin; Irene Sarosiek; Jameson Forster; Richard W McCallum
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Gastroparesis: current diagnostic challenges and management considerations.

Authors:  Shamaila Waseem; Baharak Moshiree; Peter V Draganov
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia: excerpts from the AGA/ANMS meeting.

Authors:  H P Parkman; M Camilleri; G Farrugia; R W McCallum; A E Bharucha; E A Mayer; J F Tack; R Spiller; M Horowitz; A I Vinik; J J Galligan; P J Pasricha; B Kuo; L A Szarka; L Marciani; K Jones; C R Parrish; P Sandroni; T Abell; T Ordog; W Hasler; K L Koch; K Sanders; N J Norton; F Hamilton
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 6.  Gastroparesis: pathogenesis, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  William L Hasler
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 46.802

7.  Gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis: a goal greatly pursued, but not yet attained.

Authors:  Mauro Bortolotti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Effectiveness and feasibility of robotic gastric neurostimulator placement in patients with refractory gastroparesis.

Authors:  Mia Mowzoon; Francisco Igor B Macedo; Jaskiran Kaur; Ramachandra Kolachalam
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-07-20

9.  Gastric Electrical Stimulation (GES): An Evidence Update.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-09-01

10.  Gastric Electric Stimulation for Refractory Gastroparesis: A Prospective Analysis of 151 Patients at a Single Center.

Authors:  Jason Heckert; Abhinav Sankineni; William B Hughes; Sean Harbison; Henry Parkman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.