Literature DB >> 18712373

Differential effect of linguistic and non-linguistic pen-holding tasks on motor cortex excitability.

Sasa R Filipović1, Ilias Papathanasiou, Renate Whurr, John C Rothwell, Marjan Jahanshahi.   

Abstract

Writing and drawing are unique human activities. They are complex high-precision actions, which involve not only the motor system but also various cognitive systems, such as attention, short-term memory, action control, and language. In relation to motor control, the study of writing and drawing is of great interest as they provide insight in the interaction between motor control processes and the concurrent non-motor processes. Although sharing similar motor and mechanical demands, writing and drawing involve different levels of linguistic/semantic load and thus may be associated with different modulation of motor cortical excitability. Here, we have used transcranial magnetic stimulation to study separately activation of excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms of the motor cortex during performance of writing and drawing acts as well as during simple pen-squeezing task. While cortical excitatory mechanisms appeared to be saturated by the pure motor demands of the tasks, and thus not amenable to modulation by the tasks' linguistic load, variation in cortical inhibitory activity was the main vehicle for differential modulation of motor cortical excitability by linguistic demands of the tasks. The results of this study highlight the importance of cortical inhibitory mechanisms in the physiology of higher cognitive activities. They also provide further evidence that the task specific modulation of the excitability of the motor cortex goes beyond motor complexity of the task and is also dependant on associated cognitive components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18712373     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1517-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  47 in total

1.  Task-dependent effects on motor-evoked potentials and on the following silent period.

Authors:  J Mathis; D de Quervain; C W Hess
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.177

Review 2.  Clinical and research methods for evaluating cortical excitability.

Authors:  Giovanni Abbruzzese; Carlo Trompetto
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.177

Review 3.  TMS and drugs.

Authors:  Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Topography of the inhibitory and excitatory responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation in a hand muscle.

Authors:  E M Wassermann; A Pascual-Leone; J Valls-Solé; C Toro; L G Cohen; M Hallett
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-12

5.  Dependence of the transcranially induced silent period on the 'instruction set' and the individual reaction time.

Authors:  J Mathis; D de Quervain; C W Hess
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-10

6.  Troubled letters but not numbers. Domain specific cognitive impairments following focal damage in frontal cortex.

Authors:  S W Anderson; A R Damasio; H Damasio
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Characteristics of recovery of drawing ability in left and right brain-damaged patients.

Authors:  C S Swindell; A L Holland; D Fromm; J B Greenhouse
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 8.  Contingent negative variation (CNV) and psychological processes in man.

Authors:  J J Tecce
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Left superior parietal cortex involvement in writing: integrating fMRI with lesion evidence.

Authors:  V Menon; J E Desmond
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2001-10

10.  Task-dependent modulation of inhibitory actions within the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  A Hess; E Kunesch; J Classen; J Hoeppner; K Stefan; R Benecke
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  2 in total

1.  Slow (1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) induces a sustained change in cortical excitability in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Sasa R Filipović; John C Rothwell; Kailash Bhatia
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 2.  Safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Matthew Vonloh; Robert Chen; Benzi Kluger
Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 4.891

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.