Literature DB >> 12206252

Sexual dimorphism in lizard body shape: the roles of sexual selection and fecundity selection.

Mats Olsson1, Richard Shine, Erik Wapstra, Beata Uivari, Thomas Madsen.   

Abstract

Sexual dimorphism is widespread in lizards, with the most consistently dimorphic traits being head size (males have larger heads) and trunk length (the distance between the front and hind legs is greater in females). These dimorphisms have generally been interpreted as follows: (1) large heads in males evolve through male-male rivalry (sexual selection); and (2) larger interlimb lengths in females provide space for more eggs (fecundity selection). In an Australian lizard (the snow skink, Niveoscincus microlepidotus), we found no evidence for ongoing selection on head size. Trunk length, however, was under positive fecundity selection in females and under negative sexual selection in males. Thus, fecundity selection and sexual selection work in concert to drive the evolution of sexual dimorphism in trunk length in snow skinks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12206252     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01464.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  22 in total

1.  Maternal basking behaviour determines offspring sex in a viviparous reptile.

Authors:  Erik Wapstra; Mats Olsson; Richard Shine; Ashley Edwards; Roy Swain; Jean M P Joss
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Climate-driven population divergence in sex-determining systems.

Authors:  Ido Pen; Tobias Uller; Barbara Feldmeyer; Anna Harts; Geoffrey M While; Erik Wapstra
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Fluctuating asymmetry and preferences for sex-typical bodily characteristics.

Authors:  William M Brown; Michael E Price; Jinsheng Kang; Nicholas Pound; Yue Zhao; Hui Yu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Life-history traits of two Mediterranean lizard populations: a possible example of countergradient covariation.

Authors:  Pablo Iraeta; Alfredo Salvador; José A Díaz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The morphological diversity of the quadrate bone in squamate reptiles as revealed by high-resolution computed tomography and geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Alessandro Palci; Michael W Caldwell; Mark N Hutchinson; Takuya Konishi; Michael S Y Lee
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Variation in Body Shape across Species and Populations in a Radiation of Diaptomid Copepods.

Authors:  Stephen Hausch; Jonathan B Shurin; Blake Matthews
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Do lizards and snakes really differ in their ability to take large prey? A study of relative prey mass and feeding tactics in lizards.

Authors:  Richard Shine; Jai Thomas
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 3.298

8.  Persistence and dispersal in a Southern Hemisphere glaciated landscape: the phylogeography of the spotted snow skink (Niveoscincus ocellatus) in Tasmania.

Authors:  H B Cliff; E Wapstra; C P Burridge
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Geographical variation in body size and sexual size dimorphism in an Australian lizard, Boulenger's Skink (Morethia boulengeri).

Authors:  Damian R Michael; Sam C Banks; Maxine P Piggott; Ross B Cunningham; Mason Crane; Christopher MacGregor; Lachlan McBurney; David B Lindenmayer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The interplay between natural and sexual selection in the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in Sceloporus lizards (Squamata: Phrynosomatidae).

Authors:  Víctor H Jiménez-Arcos; Salomón Sanabria-Urbán; Raúl Cueva Del Castillo
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.