Literature DB >> 18710148

Feasibility of using microalgal biomass cultured in domestic wastewater for the removal of chromium pollutants.

Xu Han1, Yuk Shan Wong, Ming Hung Wong, Nora Fung Yee Tam.   

Abstract

The feasibility of obtaining and using the biomass of a microalga, Chlorella miniata, from domestic wastewater (DW) cultures for the removal of chromium(III) [Cr(III)] and chromium(VI) [Cr(VI)] was compared with that from commercial Bristol medium (BM). Results showed that Chlorella miniata cultured in DW under 16-8 hours light-dark cycle [DW(16-8)] had similar growth to that in BM [BM(16-8)], but these two biomass had different biochemical compositions, and the former one had lower carbohydrate and higher protein content. When cultured in domestic wastewater, a higher biomass was obtained under continuous illumination [DW(24-0)], and the cells had higher carbohydrate and lower protein concentrations than that of DW(16-8). The spectra of the Fourier transform infrared spectrometer revealed that the functional groups on the surface of the three kinds of biomass--DW(16-8), DW(24-0), and BM(16-8)--were comparable, except an additional peak at 1731 cm(-1) was found in the biomass cultured in domestic wastewater, which was probably the result of bacterial contamination. Although biochemical differences were found among the three kinds of microalgal biomass, similar biosorption performances to chromium pollutants were recorded, with approximately 75% Cr(III) and 100% Cr(VI) removed at equilibrium in Cr(III) and Cr(VI) experiments, respectively, when dead biomass was used as a biosorbent. Therefore, it is possible to culture Chlorella miniata in domestic wastewater and use the biomass for the removal of chromium pollutants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18710148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Environ Res        ISSN: 1061-4303            Impact factor:   1.946


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of Cr(VI) removal by activated sludge and dissolved organic matter (DOM): importance of UV light.

Authors:  Yu-Feng Gong; Jia Song; Hai-Tao Ren; Xu Han
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  A comparative review towards potential of microbial cells for heavy metal removal with emphasis on biosorption and bioaccumulation.

Authors:  Arti Hansda; Vipin Kumar
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 3.  Diatom microalgae as smart nanocontainers for biosensing wastewater pollutants: recent trends and innovations.

Authors:  Mohd Jahir Khan; Anshuman Rai; Ankesh Ahirwar; Vandana Sirotiya; Megha Mourya; Sudhanshu Mishra; Benoit Schoefs; Justine Marchand; Shashi Kant Bhatia; Sunita Varjani; Vandana Vinayak
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.269

Review 4.  Health hazards of hexavalent chromium (Cr (VI)) and its microbial reduction.

Authors:  Pooja Sharma; Surendra Pratap Singh; Sheetal Kishor Parakh; Yen Wah Tong
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 3.269

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.