Literature DB >> 18709086

Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy with a self-calibrating fiber optic probe.

Bing Yu1, Henry Fu, Torre Bydlon, Janelle E Bender, Nirmala Ramanujam.   

Abstract

Calibration of the diffuse reflectance spectrum for instrument response and time-dependent fluctuation as well as interdevice variations is complicated, time consuming, and potentially inaccurate. We describe a novel fiber optic probe with a real-time self-calibration capability that can be used for tissue optical spectroscopy. The probe was tested in a number of liquid phantoms over a relevant range of tissue optical properties. Absorption and scattering coefficients are extracted with an average absolute error and standard deviation of 6.9%+/-7.2% and 3.5%+/-1.5%, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18709086      PMCID: PMC2802059          DOI: 10.1364/ol.33.001783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Opt Lett        ISSN: 0146-9592            Impact factor:   3.776


  7 in total

1.  Reflectance spectroscopy for in vivo detection of cervical precancer.

Authors:  Yvette N Mirabal; Sung K Chang; Edward Neely Atkinson; Anais Malpica; Michele Follen; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 2.  Fiber optic probes for biomedical optical spectroscopy.

Authors:  Urs Utzinger; Rebecca R Richards-Kortum
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  In vivo endoscopic tissue diagnostics based on spectroscopic absorption, scattering, and phase function properties.

Authors:  Philippe Thueler; Igor Charvet; Frederic Bevilacqua; M St Ghislain; G Ory; Pierre Marquet; Paolo Meda; Ben Vermeulen; Christian Depeursinge
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 4.  Spectroscopic sensing of cancer and cancer therapy: current status of translational research.

Authors:  Irving J Bigio; Stephen G Bown
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2004-03-16       Impact factor: 4.742

5.  Reflectance spectroscopy for in vivo characterization of ovarian tissue.

Authors:  U Utzinger; M Brewer; E Silva; D Gershenson; R C Blast; M Follen; R Richards-Kortum
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.025

6.  Monte Carlo-based inverse model for calculating tissue optical properties. Part I: Theory and validation on synthetic phantoms.

Authors:  Gregory M Palmer; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 1.980

7.  Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy of human adenomatous colon polyps in vivo.

Authors:  G Zonios; L T Perelman; V Backman; R Manoharan; M Fitzmaurice; J Van Dam; M S Feld
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 1.980

  7 in total
  11 in total

1.  Quantitative physiology of the precancerous cervix in vivo through optical spectroscopy.

Authors:  Vivide Tuan-Chyan Chang; Peter S Cartwright; Sarah M Bean; Greg M Palmer; Rex C Bentley; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  Instrument independent diffuse reflectance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Bing Yu; Henry L Fu; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  A fiber optic probe design to measure depth-limited optical properties in-vivo with low-coherence enhanced backscattering (LEBS) spectroscopy.

Authors:  Nikhil N Mutyal; Andrew Radosevich; Bradley Gould; Jeremy D Rogers; Andrew Gomes; Vladimir Turzhitsky; Vadim Backman
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy of epithelial tissue with a smart fiber-optic probe.

Authors:  Bing Yu; Amy Shah; Vivek K Nagarajan; Daron G Ferris
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Oblique incidence reflectometry: optical models and measurements using a side-viewing gradient index lens-based endoscopic imaging system.

Authors:  R Andrew Wall; Jennifer K Barton
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  A statistical model for removing inter-device differences in spectroscopy.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Jong Soo Lee; Pierre Lane; E Neely Atkinson; Andres Zuluaga; Michele Follen; Calum MacAulay; Dennis D Cox
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Clinical research device for ovarian cancer detection by optical spectroscopy in the ultraviolet C-visible.

Authors:  Ronie George; Archana Chandrasekaran; Molly A Brewer; Kenneth D Hatch; Urs Utzinger
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.170

8.  Assessing effects of pressure on tumor and normal tissue physiology using an automated self-calibrated, pressure-sensing probe for diffuse reflectance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Gregory M Palmer; Hengtao Zhang; Chen-Ting Lee; Husam Mikati; Joseph A Herbert; Marlee Krieger; Jesko von Windheim; Dave Koester; Daniel Stevenson; Daniel J Rocke; Ramon Esclamado; Alaatin Erkanli; Nirmala Ramanujam; Mark W Dewhirst; Walter T Lee
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  Optical assessment of tumor resection margins in the breast.

Authors:  J Quincy Brown; Torre M Bydlon; Lisa M Richards; Bing Yu; Stephanie A Kennedy; Joseph Geradts; Lee G Wilke; Marlee Junker; Jennifer Gallagher; William Barry; Nimmi Ramanujam
Journal:  IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 4.544

Review 10.  Advances in quantitative UV-visible spectroscopy for clinical and pre-clinical application in cancer.

Authors:  J Quincy Brown; Karthik Vishwanath; Gregory M Palmer; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 9.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.