Literature DB >> 29766688

Assessing effects of pressure on tumor and normal tissue physiology using an automated self-calibrated, pressure-sensing probe for diffuse reflectance spectroscopy.

Gregory M Palmer1,2, Hengtao Zhang1, Chen-Ting Lee1, Husam Mikati1, Joseph A Herbert1, Marlee Krieger2,3, Jesko von Windheim2, Dave Koester2, Daniel Stevenson2, Daniel J Rocke4, Ramon Esclamado4, Alaatin Erkanli5, Nirmala Ramanujam2,3, Mark W Dewhirst1,3, Walter T Lee4,6.   

Abstract

Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) represents a quantitative, noninvasive, nondestructive means of assessing vascular oxygenation, vascularity, and structural properties. However, it is known that such measurements can be influenced by the effects of pressure, which is a major concern for reproducible and operator-independent assessment of tissues. Second, regular calibration is a necessary component of quantitative DRS to account for factors such as lamp decay and fiber bending. Without a means of reliably controlling for these factors, the accuracy of any such assessments will be reduced, and potentially biased. To address these issues, a self-calibrating, pressure-controlled DRS system is described and applied to both a patient-derived xenograft glioma model, as well as a set of healthy volunteers for assessments of oral mucosal tissues. It was shown that pressure had a significant effect on the derived optical parameters, and that the effects on the optical parameters were magnified with increasing time and pressure levels. These findings indicate that not only is it critical to integrate a pressure sensor into a DRS device, but that it is also important to do so in an automated way to trigger a measurement as soon as possible after probe contact is made to minimize the perturbation to the tissue site.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diffuse reflectance spectroscopy; pressure; spectroscopy; tissue

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29766688      PMCID: PMC5981029          DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.23.5.057004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Opt        ISSN: 1083-3668            Impact factor:   3.170


  13 in total

1.  Simultaneous assessment of pulsating and total blood in inflammatory skin lesions using functional diffuse reflectance spectroscopy in the visible range.

Authors:  InSeok Seo; Paulo R Bargo; Nikiforos Kollias
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Monte Carlo-based inverse model for calculating tissue optical properties. Part I: Theory and validation on synthetic phantoms.

Authors:  Gregory M Palmer; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 1.980

3.  Calibration standards for multicenter clinical trials of fluorescence spectroscopy for in vivo diagnosis.

Authors:  Nena M Marín; Nicholas MacKinnon; Calum MacAulay; Sung K Chang; E Neely Atkinson; Dennis Cox; Dan Serachitopol; Brian Pikkula; Michele Follen; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Analysis of changes in reflectance measurements on biological tissues subjected to different probe pressures.

Authors:  Roberto Reif; Mark S Amorosino; Katherine W Calabro; Ousama A'Amar; Satish K Singh; Irving J Bigio
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Design and testing of a white-light, steady-state diffuse reflectance spectrometer for determination of optical properties of highly scattering systems.

Authors:  M G Nichols; E L Hull; T H Foster
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 1.980

6.  Diffuse-reflectance spectroscopy from 500 to 1060 nm by correction for inhomogeneously distributed absorbers.

Authors:  R L P van Veen; W Verkruysse; H J C M Sterenborg
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 3.776

7.  Effects of probe contact pressure on in vivo optical spectroscopy.

Authors:  Yalin Ti; Wei-Chiang Lin
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Towards a field-compatible optical spectroscopic device for cervical cancer screening in resource-limited settings: effects of calibration and pressure.

Authors:  Vivide Tuan-Chyan Chang; Delson Merisier; Bing Yu; David K Walmer; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Quantitative optical spectroscopy can identify long-term local tumor control in irradiated murine head and neck xenografts.

Authors:  Karthik Vishwanath; Daniel Klein; Kevin Chang; Thies Schroeder; Mark W Dewhirst; Nimmi Ramanujam
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 10.  Cycling hypoxia and free radicals regulate angiogenesis and radiotherapy response.

Authors:  Mark W Dewhirst; Yiting Cao; Benjamin Moeller
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 60.716

View more
  1 in total

1.  Development of a non-invasive method for skin cholesterol detection: pre-clinical assessment in atherosclerosis screening.

Authors:  Jingshu Ni; Haiou Hong; Yang Zhang; Shiqi Tang; Yongsheng Han; Zhaohui Fang; Yuanzhi Zhang; Nan Zhou; Quanfu Wang; Yong Liu; Zhongsheng Li; YiKun Wang; Meili Dong
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.819

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.