Literature DB >> 18707720

Prognostic factors in invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: analysis of 196 patients treated at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute.

Antonio Augusto Ornellas1, Bernardo Lindenberg Braga Nóbrega, Eduardo Wei Kin Chin, Aristóteles Wisnescky, Paulo Cesar Barbosa da Silva, Aline Barros de Santos Schwindt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the role of primary tumor histopathological features for predicting regional metastasis and the prognosis in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 1996 to January 2007, 202 consecutive patients with penile carcinoma underwent surgical treatment at our institution. Of these patients 196 were studied to identify prognostic factors. All histological specimens were examined by the same pathologist. We considered certain histological parameters, including histological grade, invasion depth, lymphovascular embolization, perineural infiltration, infiltration of the corpus cavernosum or spongiosum, urethral infiltration and koilocytosis.
RESULTS: Variables significantly associated with regional metastasis on univariate analysis were stage stratification (p = 0.0338), histological grade (p = 0.0112), invasion depth (0.0114), lymphovascular embolization (p <0.0001), perineural infiltration (p = 0.0092), corpora cavernosa infiltration (p = 0.0005) and koilocytosis (p = 0.0013). In the multivariable model lymphovascular embolization and absent koilocytosis were independent risk factors for lymphatic metastasis (p = 0.001 and 0.009, respectively). We also found a better survival rate in patients with koilocytosis and without lymphovascular embolization (p = 0.001 and 0.005, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Lymphovascular embolization and absent koilocytosis were independent prognostic factors for the risk of lymphatic metastasis. Patients with koilocytosis and without lymphovascular embolization had better 5-year survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18707720     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.06.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  20 in total

1.  Management of carcinoma of the penis: Consensus statement from the Canadian Association of Genitourinary Medical Oncologists (CAGMO).

Authors:  Suzanne Richter; J Dean Ruether; Lori Wood; Christina Canil; Patricia Moretto; Peter Venner; Joel Gingerich; Urban Emmenegger; Andrea Eisen; Pawel Zalewski; Anthony Joshua; Som Dave Mukherjee; Daniel Heng; Piotr Czaykowski; Denis Soulieres; Norman Blais; Ricardo Rendon; Neil Fleshner; Juanita M Crook; Srikala S Sridhar
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Radiotherapy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in penile cancer patients with extracapsular nodal extension after inguinal lymph node surgery: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Zai-Shang Li; Xue-Ying Li; Bin Wang; Peng Chen; Xiang Li; Ornellas Antonio Augusto; Zi-Ke Qin; Zhuo-Wei Liu; Yong-Hong Li; Hui Han; Fang-Jian Zhou
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Penile cancer: current therapy and future directions.

Authors:  G Sonpavde; L C Pagliaro; C Buonerba; T B Dorff; R J Lee; G Di Lorenzo
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Inguinal Lymph Nodes in Carcinoma Penis-Observation or Surgery?

Authors:  Syed Althaf; Rajkumar P Narayanakar; Dinesh M Gangaiah; Kapil Dev; Vishnu P Kurpad; Jaiprakash Gurawalia
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-01-01

5.  Epigenetics markers of metastasis and HPV-induced tumorigenesis in penile cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Feber; Manit Arya; Patricia de Winter; Muhammad Saqib; Raj Nigam; Peter R Malone; Wei Shen Tan; Simon Rodney; Matthias Lechner; Alex Freeman; Charles Jameson; Asif Muneer; Stephan Beck; John D Kelly
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Tumor Location May Independently Predict Survival in Patients With M0 Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis.

Authors:  Kai Li; Xiang Le; Jianqing Wang; Caibin Fan; Jian Sun
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  18F-FDG PET/CT as a prognostic factor in penile cancer.

Authors:  André Salazar; Eduardo Paulino Júnior; Paulo Guilherme O Salles; Raul Silva-Filho; Edna A Reis; Marcelo Mamede
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Phase 1 prospective evaluation of the oncological adequacy of robotic assisted video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with penile carcinoma.

Authors:  Surena F Matin; Janice N Cormier; John F Ward; Louis L Pisters; Christopher G Wood; Colin P N Dinney; Richard E Royal; Xuelin Huang; Curtis A Pettaway
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Penile cancer: Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Peter E Clark; Philippe E Spiess; Neeraj Agarwal; Matthew C Biagioli; Mario A Eisenberger; Richard E Greenberg; Harry W Herr; Brant A Inman; Deborah A Kuban; Timothy M Kuzel; Subodh M Lele; Jeff Michalski; Lance Pagliaro; Sumanta K Pal; Anthony Patterson; Elizabeth R Plimack; Kamal S Pohar; Michael P Porter; Jerome P Richie; Wade J Sexton; William U Shipley; Eric J Small; Donald L Trump; Geoffrey Wile; Timothy G Wilson; Mary Dwyer; Maria Ho
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 11.908

10.  SOD2 immunoexpression predicts lymph node metastasis in penile cancer.

Authors:  Lara Termini; José H Fregnani; Enrique Boccardo; Walter H da Costa; Adhemar Longatto-Filho; Maria A Andreoli; Maria C Costa; Ademar Lopes; Isabela W da Cunha; Fernando A Soares; Luisa L Villa; Gustavo C Guimarães
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2015-03-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.