Literature DB >> 18707487

A mechanism for the evolution of altruism among nonkin: positive assortment through environmental feedback.

John W Pepper1, Barbara B Smuts.   

Abstract

The evolution of altruism often requires genetic similarity among interactors. For structured populations in which a social trait affects all group members, this entails positive assortment, meaning that cooperators and noncooperators tend to be segregated into different groups. Several authors have claimed that mechanisms other than common descent can produce positive assortment, but this claim has not been generally accepted. Here, we describe one such mechanism. The process of "environmental feedback" requires only that the cooperative trait affects the quality of the local environment and that individuals are more likely to leave low-quality than high-quality environments. We illustrate this dynamic using an agent-based spatial model of feeding restraint. Depending on parameter settings, results included both positive assortment (required for the evolution of altruism) and negative assortment (required for the evolution of spite). The mechanism of environmental feedback appears to be a general one that could play a role in the evolution of many forms of cooperation.

Year:  2002        PMID: 18707487     DOI: 10.1086/341018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  27 in total

1.  An evolutionary scenario for the transition to undifferentiated multicellularity.

Authors:  Thomas Pfeiffer; Sebastian Bonhoeffer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Invasion and expansion of cooperators in lattice populations: prisoner's dilemma vs. snowdrift games.

Authors:  Feng Fu; Martin A Nowak; Christoph Hauert
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Contingent movement and cooperation evolve under generalized reciprocity.

Authors:  Ian M Hamilton; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  A model of sexual selection and female use of refuge in a coercive mating system.

Authors:  Dessa Bokides; Yuan Lou; Ian M Hamilton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Evolution of restraint in a structured rock-paper-scissors community.

Authors:  Joshua R Nahum; Brittany N Harding; Benjamin Kerr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The emergence of cooperation from a single mutant during microbial life cycles.

Authors:  Anna Melbinger; Jonas Cremer; Erwin Frey
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Kinship, lineage, and an evolutionary perspective on cooperative hunting groups in Indonesia.

Authors:  Michael S Alvard
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2003-06

8.  Is cooperation viable in mobile organisms? Simple Walk Away rule favors the evolution of cooperation in groups.

Authors:  C Athena Aktipis
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.178

9.  Eight criticisms not to make about group selection.

Authors:  Omar Tonsi Eldakar; David Sloan Wilson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Population structure influences sexual conflict in wild populations of water striders.

Authors:  Omar Tonsi Eldakar; Michael J Dlugos; Galen P Holt; David Sloan Wilson; Johnw Pepper
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.