Literature DB >> 18706456

Chromatin structure influences the sensitivity of DNA to gamma-radiation.

Martin Falk1, Emilie Lukásová, Stanislav Kozubek.   

Abstract

For the first time, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) were directly visualized in functionally and structurally different chromatin domains of human cells. The results show that genetically inactive condensed chromatin is much less susceptible to DSB induction by gamma-rays than expressed, decondensed domains. Higher sensitivity of open chromatin for DNA damage was accompanied by more efficient DSB repair. These findings follow from comparing DSB induction and repair in two 11 Mbp-long chromatin regions, one with clusters of highly expressed genes and the other, gene-poor, containing mainly genes having only low transcriptional activity. The same conclusions result from experiments with whole chromosome territories, differing in gene density and consequently in chromatin condensation. It follows from our further results that this lower sensitivity of DNA to the damage by ionizing radiation in heterochromatin is not caused by the simple chromatin condensation but very probably by the presence of a higher amount of proteins compared to genetically active and decondensed chromatin. In addition, our results show that some agents potentially used for cell killing in cancer therapy (TSA, hypotonic and hypertonic) influence cell survival of irradiated cells via changes in chromatin structure and efficiency of DSB repair in different ways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18706456     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  62 in total

Review 1.  Modifying radiation damage.

Authors:  Kwanghee Kim; William H McBride
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.465

2.  Different DNA-PKcs functions in the repair of radiation-induced and spontaneous DSBs within interstitial telomeric sequences.

Authors:  Déborah Revaud; Luis M Martins; François D Boussin; Laure Sabatier; Chantal Desmaze
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 3.  Mechanisms and Consequences of Double-Strand DNA Break Formation in Chromatin.

Authors:  Wendy J Cannan; David S Pederson
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.384

4.  Adenovirus Core Protein VII Downregulates the DNA Damage Response on the Host Genome.

Authors:  Daphne C Avgousti; Ashley N Della Fera; Clayton J Otter; Christin Herrmann; Neha J Pancholi; Matthew D Weitzman
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Nucleosomes suppress the formation of double-strand DNA breaks during attempted base excision repair of clustered oxidative damages.

Authors:  Wendy J Cannan; Betty P Tsang; Susan S Wallace; David S Pederson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Compartmentation of metabolites in regulating epigenome of cancer.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Zhao; Li Wang; Lijun Di
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 6.354

7.  Epigenetic mechanisms of mouse interstrain variability in genotoxicity of the environmental toxicant 1,3-butadiene.

Authors:  Igor Koturbash; Anne Scherhag; Jessica Sorrentino; Kenneth Sexton; Wanda Bodnar; James A Swenberg; Frederick A Beland; Fernando Pardo-Manuel Devillena; Ivan Rusyn; Igor P Pogribny
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Pluripotency factor Nanog is tumorigenic by deregulating DNA damage response in somatic cells.

Authors:  J Kim; Y Liu; M Qiu; Y Xu
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  The structure of the desiccated Richtersius coronifer (Richters, 1903).

Authors:  Michaela Czerneková; K Ingemar Jönsson; Lukasz Chajec; Sebastian Student; Izabela Poprawa
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.356

10.  Bleomycin-induced γH2AX foci map preferentially to replicating domains in CHO9 interphase nuclei.

Authors:  Pablo Liddle; Laura Lafon-Hughes; María Vittoria Di Tomaso; Ana Laura Reyes-Ábalos; Jorge Jara; Mauricio Cerda; Steffen Härtel; Gustavo A Folle
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.