BACKGROUND: While new defects in BRCA1 are still being found, it is unclear whether current breast cancer diagnostics misses many BRCA1-associated cases. A reliable test that is able to indicate the involvement of BRCA1 deficiency in cancer genesis could support decision making in genetic counselling and clinical management. To find BRCA1-specific markers and explore the effectiveness of the current diagnostic strategy, we designed a classification method, validated it and examined whether we could find BRCA1-like breast tumours in a group of patients initially diagnosed as non-BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. METHODS: A classifier was built based on array-CGH profiles of 18 BRCA1-related and 32 control breast tumours, and validated on independent sets of 16 BRCA1-related and 16 control breast carcinomas. Subsequently, we applied the classifier to 48 breast tumours of patients from Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) families in whom no germ line BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations were identified. RESULTS: The classifier showed an accuracy of 91% when applied to the validation sets. In 48 non-BRCA1/2 patients, only two breast tumours presented a BRCA1-like CGH profile. Additional evidence for BRCA1 dysfunction was found in one of these tumours. CONCLUSION: We here describe the specific chromosomal aberrations in BRCA1-related breast carcinomas. We developed a predictive genetic test for BRCA1-association and show that BRCA1-related tumours can still be identified in HBOC families after routine DNA diagnostics.
BACKGROUND: While new defects in BRCA1 are still being found, it is unclear whether current breast cancer diagnostics misses many BRCA1-associated cases. A reliable test that is able to indicate the involvement of BRCA1 deficiency in cancer genesis could support decision making in genetic counselling and clinical management. To find BRCA1-specific markers and explore the effectiveness of the current diagnostic strategy, we designed a classification method, validated it and examined whether we could find BRCA1-like breast tumours in a group of patients initially diagnosed as non-BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. METHODS: A classifier was built based on array-CGH profiles of 18 BRCA1-related and 32 control breast tumours, and validated on independent sets of 16 BRCA1-related and 16 control breast carcinomas. Subsequently, we applied the classifier to 48 breast tumours of patients from Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) families in whom no germ line BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations were identified. RESULTS: The classifier showed an accuracy of 91% when applied to the validation sets. In 48 non-BRCA1/2patients, only two breast tumours presented a BRCA1-like CGH profile. Additional evidence for BRCA1 dysfunction was found in one of these tumours. CONCLUSION: We here describe the specific chromosomal aberrations in BRCA1-related breast carcinomas. We developed a predictive genetic test for BRCA1-association and show that BRCA1-related tumours can still be identified in HBOC families after routine DNA diagnostics.
Authors: Helen Davies; Dominik Glodzik; Sandro Morganella; Lucy R Yates; Johan Staaf; Xueqing Zou; Manasa Ramakrishna; Sancha Martin; Sandrine Boyault; Anieta M Sieuwerts; Peter T Simpson; Tari A King; Keiran Raine; Jorunn E Eyfjord; Gu Kong; Åke Borg; Ewan Birney; Hendrik G Stunnenberg; Marc J van de Vijver; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; John W M Martens; Paul N Span; Sunil R Lakhani; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Christos Sotiriou; Andrew Tutt; Alastair M Thompson; Steven Van Laere; Andrea L Richardson; Alain Viari; Peter J Campbell; Michael R Stratton; Serena Nik-Zainal Journal: Nat Med Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Na Li; Simone McInerny; Magnus Zethoven; Dane Cheasley; Belle W X Lim; Simone M Rowley; Lisa Devereux; Norah Grewal; Somayeh Ahmadloo; David Byrne; Jue Er Amanda Lee; Jason Li; Stephen B Fox; Thomas John; Yoland Antill; Kylie L Gorringe; Paul A James; Ian G Campbell Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Sean P Pitroda; Riyue Bao; Jorge Andrade; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Philip P Connell Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-03-24 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Rosa Murria Estal; Sarai Palanca Suela; Inmaculada de Juan Jiménez; Cristina Alenda Gonzalez; Cecilia Egoavil Rojas; Zaida García-Casado; Jose Antonio López Guerrero; María José Juan Fita; Ana Beatriz Sánchez Heras; Ángel Segura Huerta; Ana Santaballa Bertrán; Isabel Chirivella González; Marta Llop García; Gema Pérez Simó; Eva Barragán González; Pascual Bolufer Gilabert Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Robert M W Hofstra; Amanda B Spurdle; Diana Eccles; William D Foulkes; Niels de Wind; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Frans B L Hogervorst Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: M T Branham; E Campoy; S Laurito; R Branham; G Urrutia; J Orozco; F Gago; R Urrutia; M Roqué Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2015-11-27 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Lorenzo Melchor; Laura Paula Saucedo-Cuevas; Iván Muñoz-Repeto; Socorro María Rodríguez-Pinilla; Emiliano Honrado; Alfredo Campoverde; Jose Palacios; Katherine L Nathanson; María José García; Javier Benítez Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2009-12-08 Impact factor: 6.466