Literature DB >> 18704101

Daily left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depression: clinical predictors of outcome in a multisite, randomized controlled clinical trial.

Sarah H Lisanby1, Mustafa M Husain, Peter B Rosenquist, Daniel Maixner, Rosben Gutierrez, Andrew Krystal, William Gilmer, Lauren B Marangell, Scott Aaronson, Zafiris J Daskalakis, Randolph Canterbury, Elliott Richelson, Harold A Sackeim, Mark S George.   

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials support the antidepressant efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS); however, there is individual variability in the magnitude of response. Examination of response predictors has been hampered by methodological limitations such as small sample sizes and single-site study designs. Data from a multisite sham-controlled trial of the antidepressant efficacy of TMS provided an opportunity to examine predictors of acute outcome. An open-label extension for patients who failed to improve provided the opportunity for confirmatory analysis. Treatment was administered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at 10 pulses per second, 120% of motor threshold, for a total of 3000 pulses per day. Change on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale after 4 weeks was the primary efficacy outcome. A total of 301 patients with nonpsychotic unipolar major depression at 23 centers were randomized to active or sham TMS. Univariate predictor analyses showed that the degree of prior treatment resistance in the current episode was a predictor of positive treatment outcome in both the controlled study and the open-label extension trial. In the randomized trial, shorter duration of current episode was also associated with a better outcome. In the open-label extension study, absence of anxiety disorder comorbidity was associated with an improved outcome, but duration of current episode was not. The number of prior treatment failures was the strongest predictor for positive response to acute treatment with TMS. Shorter duration of current illness and lack of anxiety comorbidity may also confer an increased likelihood of good antidepressant response to TMS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18704101     DOI: 10.1038/npp.2008.118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology        ISSN: 0893-133X            Impact factor:   7.853


  80 in total

Review 1.  Somatic treatments for mood disorders.

Authors:  Moacyr A Rosa; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Stuck in a rut: rethinking depression and its treatment.

Authors:  Paul E Holtzheimer; Helen S Mayberg
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 3.  Ketamine for treatment-resistant unipolar depression: current evidence.

Authors:  Sanjay J Mathew; Asim Shah; Kyle Lapidus; Crystal Clark; Noor Jarun; Britta Ostermeyer; James W Murrough
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 5.749

4.  The NeuroStar TMS device: conducting the FDA approved protocol for treatment of depression.

Authors:  Jared C Horvath; John Mathews; Mark A Demitrack; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Treatment-Resistant Major Depression in US Veterans: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jerome A Yesavage; J Kaci Fairchild; Zhibao Mi; Kousick Biswas; Anne Davis-Karim; Ciaran S Phibbs; Steven D Forman; Michael Thase; Leanne M Williams; Amit Etkin; Ruth O'Hara; Gerald Georgette; Tamara Beale; Grant D Huang; Art Noda; Mark S George
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 21.596

6.  Elevated prefrontal cortex GABA in patients with major depressive disorder after TMS treatment measured with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Marc J Dubin; Xiangling Mao; Samprit Banerjee; Zachary Goodman; Kyle A B Lapidus; Guoxin Kang; Conor Liston; Dikoma C Shungu
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.186

7.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression in Adult and Youth Populations: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Laura E Leggett; Lesley J J Soril; Stephanie Coward; Diane L Lorenzetti; Gail MacKean; Fiona M Clement
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2015-11-05

Review 8.  Transcranial direct current stimulation for acute major depressive episodes: meta-analysis of individual patient data.

Authors:  André R Brunoni; Adriano H Moffa; Felipe Fregni; Ulrich Palm; Frank Padberg; Daniel M Blumberger; Zafiris J Daskalakis; Djamila Bennabi; Emmanuel Haffen; Angelo Alonzo; Colleen K Loo
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 9.319

9.  Modulation of motor cortex excitability predicts antidepressant response to prefrontal cortex repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Albino J Oliveira-Maia; Daniel Press; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 10.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Deborah R Kim; Angeliki Pesiridou; John P O'Reardon
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.