BACKGROUND: The precise measurement of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma facilitates noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies and other applications. We tested the hypothesis that microfluidics digital PCR, in which individual fetal-DNA molecules are counted, could enhance the precision of measuring circulating fetal DNA. METHODS: We first determined whether microfluidics digital PCR, real-time PCR, and mass spectrometry produced different estimates of male-DNA concentrations in artificial mixtures of male and female DNA. We then focused on comparing the imprecision of microfluidics digital PCR with that of a well-established nondigital PCR assay for measuring male fetal DNA in maternal plasma. RESULTS: Of the tested platforms, microfluidics digital PCR demonstrated the least quantitative bias for measuring the fractional concentration of male DNA. This assay had a lower imprecision and higher clinical sensitivity compared with nondigital real-time PCR. With the ZFY/ZFX assay on the microfluidics digital PCR platform, the median fractional concentration of fetal DNA in maternal plasma was > or =2 times higher for all 3 trimesters of pregnancy than previously reported. CONCLUSIONS: Microfluidics digital PCR represents an improvement over previous methods for quantifying fetal DNA in maternal plasma, enabling diagnostic and research applications requiring precise quantification. This approach may also impact other diagnostic applications of plasma nucleic acids, e.g., in oncology and transplantation.
BACKGROUND: The precise measurement of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma facilitates noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies and other applications. We tested the hypothesis that microfluidics digital PCR, in which individual fetal-DNA molecules are counted, could enhance the precision of measuring circulating fetal DNA. METHODS: We first determined whether microfluidics digital PCR, real-time PCR, and mass spectrometry produced different estimates of male-DNA concentrations in artificial mixtures of male and female DNA. We then focused on comparing the imprecision of microfluidics digital PCR with that of a well-established nondigital PCR assay for measuring male fetal DNA in maternal plasma. RESULTS: Of the tested platforms, microfluidics digital PCR demonstrated the least quantitative bias for measuring the fractional concentration of male DNA. This assay had a lower imprecision and higher clinical sensitivity compared with nondigital real-time PCR. With the ZFY/ZFX assay on the microfluidics digital PCR platform, the median fractional concentration of fetal DNA in maternal plasma was > or =2 times higher for all 3 trimesters of pregnancy than previously reported. CONCLUSIONS: Microfluidics digital PCR represents an improvement over previous methods for quantifying fetal DNA in maternal plasma, enabling diagnostic and research applications requiring precise quantification. This approach may also impact other diagnostic applications of plasma nucleic acids, e.g., in oncology and transplantation.
Authors: Fiona M F Lun; Nancy B Y Tsui; K C Allen Chan; Tak Y Leung; Tze K Lau; Pimlak Charoenkwan; Katherine C K Chow; Wyatt Y W Lo; Chanane Wanapirak; Torpong Sanguansermsri; Charles R Cantor; Rossa W K Chiu; Y M Dennis Lo Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-12-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Maurice Chan; Mei Wen Chan; Ting Wei Loh; Hai Yang Law; Chui Sheun Yoon; Sint Sint Than; Jia Mei Chua; Chow Yin Wong; Wei Sean Yong; Yoon Sim Yap; Gay Hui Ho; Peter Ang; Ann Siew Gek Lee Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Rossa W K Chiu; K C Allen Chan; Yuan Gao; Virginia Y M Lau; Wenli Zheng; Tak Y Leung; Chris H F Foo; Bin Xie; Nancy B Y Tsui; Fiona M F Lun; Benny C Y Zee; Tze K Lau; Charles R Cantor; Y M Dennis Lo Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-12-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Matthew R Grace; Emily Hardisty; Sarah K Dotters-Katz; Neeta L Vora; Jeffrey A Kuller Journal: Obstet Gynecol Surv Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 2.347