Literature DB >> 18701468

Staging of breast cancer in the neoadjuvant setting.

Jacqueline S Jeruss1, Elizabeth A Mittendorf, Susan L Tucker, Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo, Thomas A Buchholz, Aysegul A Sahin, Janice N Cormier, Aman U Buzdar, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Kelly K Hunt.   

Abstract

The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has become more prevalent in the treatment of breast cancer patients. The finding of a pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (no evidence of residual invasive cancer in the breast and lymph nodes at the time of surgical resection) has been shown to correlate with improved survival. The current version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging for breast cancer has a pretreatment clinical stage designation that is determined by clinical and radiographic examination of the patient and a postoperative pathologic stage classification based on the findings in the breast and regional lymph nodes removed at surgery. Pathologic staging has not been validated for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy; thus, prognosis is determined for these patients based on the pretreatment clinical stage. We hypothesized that clinical and pathologic staging variables could be combined with biological tumor markers to provide a novel means of determining prognosis for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Two scoring systems, based on summing binary indicators for clinical and pathologic substages, negative estrogen receptor status, and grade 3 tumor pathology, were devised to predict 5-year patient outcomes. These scoring systems facilitated separation of the study population into more refined subgroups by outcome than the current AJCC staging system for breast cancer, and provide a novel means for evaluating prognosis after neoadjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18701468      PMCID: PMC4441792          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  31 in total

1.  Doxorubicin with cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel every 21 days compared with doxorubicin and docetaxel every 14 days as preoperative treatment in operable breast cancer: the GEPARDUO study of the German Breast Group.

Authors:  Gunter von Minckwitz; Günter Raab; Angelika Caputo; Martin Schütte; Jörn Hilfrich; Jens U Blohmer; Bernd Gerber; Serban D Costa; Elisabeth Merkle; Holger Eidtmann; Dieter Lampe; Christian Jackisch; Andreas du Bois; Manfred Kaufmann
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Prognostic value of pathologic complete response after primary chemotherapy in relation to hormone receptor status and other factors.

Authors:  Valentina Guarneri; Kristine Broglio; Shu-Wan Kau; Massimo Cristofanilli; Aman U Buzdar; Vicente Valero; Thomas Buchholz; Funda Meric; Lavinia Middleton; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Cyclin E and survival in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Khandan Keyomarsi; Susan L Tucker; Thomas A Buchholz; Matthew Callister; Ye Ding; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Isabelle Bedrosian; Christopher Knickerbocker; Wendy Toyofuku; Michael Lowe; Thaddeus W Herliczek; Sarah S Bacus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-11-14       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: eight-year experience at the Milan Cancer Institute.

Authors:  G Bonadonna; P Valagussa; C Brambilla; L Ferrari; A Moliterni; M Terenziani; M Zambetti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Breast cancer staging: working with the sixth edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual.

Authors:  S Eva Singletary; James L Connolly
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: significantly enhanced response with docetaxel.

Authors:  Ian C Smith; Steven D Heys; Andrew W Hutcheon; Iain D Miller; Simon Payne; Fiona J Gilbert; Antoinne K Ah-See; Oleg Eremin; Leslie G Walker; Tarun K Sarkar; S Peter Eggleton; Keith N Ogston
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis stage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast cancer outcome.

Authors:  Lisa A Carey; Richard Metzger; E Claire Dees; Frances Collichio; Carolyn I Sartor; David W Ollila; Nancy Klauber-DeMore; Jan Halle; Lynda Sawyer; Dominic T Moore; Mark L Graham
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  W Fraser Symmans; Florentia Peintinger; Christos Hatzis; Radhika Rajan; Henry Kuerer; Vicente Valero; Lina Assad; Anna Poniecka; Bryan Hennessy; Marjorie Green; Aman U Buzdar; S Eva Singletary; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Gene expression profiling in breast cancer.

Authors:  Shannon R Morris; Lisa A Carey
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.645

10.  Clinical trial update: implications and management of residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Erica L Mayer; Lisa A Carey; Harold J Burstein
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Incorporation of clinical and biological factors improves prognostication and reflects contemporary clinical practice.

Authors:  Rashmi K Murthy; Juhee Song; Akshara S Raghavendra; Yisheng Li; Limin Hsu; Kenneth R Hess; Carlos H Barcenas; Vicente Valero; Robert W Carlson; Debu Tripathy; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-03-25

2.  Validation of a novel staging system for disease-specific survival in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Jacqueline S Jeruss; Susan L Tucker; Aparna Kolli; Lisa A Newman; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Thomas A Buchholz; Aysegul A Sahin; Janice N Cormier; Aman U Buzdar; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Nomogram predicting clinical outcomes in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Bhumsuk Keam; Seock-Ah Im; Sohee Park; Byung-Ho Nam; Sae-Won Han; Do-Youn Oh; Jee Hyun Kim; Se-Hoon Lee; Wonshik Han; Dong-Wan Kim; Tae-You Kim; In Ae Park; Dong-Young Noh; Dae Seog Heo; Yung-Jue Bang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Novel staging system for predicting disease-specific survival in patients with breast cancer treated with surgery as the first intervention: time to modify the current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system.

Authors:  Min Yi; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Janice N Cormier; Thomas A Buchholz; Karl Bilimoria; Aysegul A Sahin; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; Sheng Luo; Aman U Buzdar; Jaime R Crow; Henry M Kuerer; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Pilot trial of preoperative (neoadjuvant) letrozole in combination with bevacizumab in postmenopausal women with newly diagnosed estrogen receptor- or progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Andres Forero-Torres; Mansoor N Saleh; Janice A Galleshaw; Cheryl F Jones; Jatin J Shah; Ivor J Percent; Lisle M Nabell; John T Carpenter; Carla I Falkson; Helen Krontiras; Marshall M Urist; Kirby I Bland; Jennifer F De Los Santos; Ruby F Meredith; Valerie Caterinicchia; Wanda K Bernreuter; Janis P O'Malley; Yufeng Li; Albert F LoBuglio
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The effects of adding zoledronic acid to neoadjuvant chemotherapy on tumour response: exploratory evidence for direct anti-tumour activity in breast cancer.

Authors:  R E Coleman; M C Winter; D Cameron; R Bell; D Dodwell; M M Keane; M Gil; D Ritchie; J L Passos-Coelho; D Wheatley; R Burkinshaw; S J Marshall; H Thorpe
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Breast cancer DNA methylation profiles are associated with tumor size and alcohol and folate intake.

Authors:  Brock C Christensen; Karl T Kelsey; Shichun Zheng; E Andres Houseman; Carmen J Marsit; Margaret R Wrensch; Joseph L Wiemels; Heather H Nelson; Margaret R Karagas; Lawrence H Kushi; Marilyn L Kwan; John K Wiencke
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Identifying grade/stage-related active modules in human co-regulatory networks: a case study for breast cancer.

Authors:  Chenchen Feng; Lina Chen; Wan Li; Hong Wang; Liangcai Zhang; Xu Jia; Zhengqiang Miao; Xiaoli Qu; Weiguo Li; Weiming He
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2012-12

9.  Common and discriminative clinicopathological features between breast cancers with pathological complete response or progressive disease in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Tomo Osako; Rie Horii; Masaaki Matsuura; Akiko Ogiya; Kaoru Domoto; Yumi Miyagi; Shunji Takahashi; Yoshinori Ito; Takuji Iwase; Futoshi Akiyama
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  The potential prognostic value of connexin 26 and 46 expression in neoadjuvant-treated breast cancer.

Authors:  Ivett Teleki; Tibor Krenacs; Marcell A Szasz; Janina Kulka; Barna Wichmann; Cornelia Leo; Barbel Papassotiropoulos; Cosima Riemenschnitter; Holger Moch; Zsuzsanna Varga
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.