Literature DB >> 18700211

Wake-up call for British psychiatry.

Nick Craddock1, Danny Antebi, Mary-Jane Attenburrow, Anthony Bailey, Alan Carson, Phil Cowen, Bridget Craddock, John Eagles, Klaus Ebmeier, Anne Farmer, Seena Fazel, Nicol Ferrier, John Geddes, Guy Goodwin, Paul Harrison, Keith Hawton, Stephen Hunter, Robin Jacoby, Ian Jones, Paul Keedwell, Mike Kerr, Paul Mackin, Peter McGuffin, Donald J Macintyre, Pauline McConville, Deborah Mountain, Michael C O'Donovan, Michael J Owen, Femi Oyebode, Mary Phillips, Jonathan Price, Prem Shah, Danny J Smith, James Walters, Peter Woodruff, Allan Young, Stan Zammit.   

Abstract

The recent drive within the UK National Health Service to improve psychosocial care for people with mental illness is both understandable and welcome: evidence-based psychological and social interventions are extremely important in managing psychiatric illness. Nevertheless, the accompanying downgrading of medical aspects of care has resulted in services that often are better suited to offering non-specific psychosocial support, rather than thorough, broad-based diagnostic assessment leading to specific treatments to optimise well-being and functioning. In part, these changes have been politically driven, but they could not have occurred without the collusion, or at least the acquiescence, of psychiatrists. This creeping devaluation of medicine disadvantages patients and is very damaging to both the standing and the understanding of psychiatry in the minds of the public, fellow professionals and the medical students who will be responsible for the specialty's future. On the 200th birthday of psychiatry, it is fitting to reconsider the specialty's core values and renew efforts to use psychiatric skills for the maximum benefit of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18700211     DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.053561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0007-1250            Impact factor:   9.319


  20 in total

Review 1.  British psychiatry and its discontents.

Authors:  Brian Cooper
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  EPA guidance on improving the image of psychiatry.

Authors:  A M Möller-Leimkühler; H-J Möller; W Maier; W Gaebel; P Falkai
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 5.270

3.  Are psychiatrists an endangered species? Observations on internal and external challenges to the profession.

Authors:  Heinz Katschnig
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 49.548

4.  Patients must be able to derive maximum benefit from a psychiatrist's medical skills and broad training.

Authors:  Nick Craddock; Bridget Craddock
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 5.  Psychosis: an autoimmune disease?

Authors:  Adam A J Al-Diwani; Thomas A Pollak; Sarosh R Irani; Belinda R Lennox
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 7.397

6.  Public mental health: science or politics?

Authors:  Guy M Goodwin
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 49.548

7.  [Where can psychiatry go from here?]

Authors:  S Priebe
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.214

8.  Should mental disorders be regarded as brain disorders? 21st century mental health sciences and implications for research and training.

Authors:  Derek Bolton
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 49.548

9.  Social neuroscience: bringing an end to the destructive and misguided "social" versus "biological" in psychiatry.

Authors:  Nick Craddock
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 49.548

10.  The clinical experience and potential of brain imaging in patients with mental illness.

Authors:  Belinda R Lennox
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.