| Literature DB >> 18700005 |
Bernhard Schaaf1, Cornelia Liebau, Volkhard Kurowski, Daniel Droemann, Klaus Dalhoff.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neutrophil products like matrix metalloproteinases (MMP), involved in bacterial defence mechanisms, possibly induce lung damage and are elevated locally during hospital- acquired pneumonia (HAP). In HAP the virulence of bacterial species is known to be different. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of high-risk bacteria like S. aureus and pseudomonas species on pulmonary MMP concentration in human pneumonia.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18700005 PMCID: PMC2518539 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2466-8-12
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pulm Med ISSN: 1471-2466 Impact factor: 3.317
Figure 1Gelatine zymography of mini-BAL from representative patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (Lane 1–7). MMP standard (lane 8). Gelatinolytic bands of pro-MMP-9 (92 kD), pro-MMP-9-lipocalin-complex (130 kD) and homodimeric MMP-9 (220 kD) are clearly visible.
Demographic data (Mean ± SEM) of 37 patients with HAP, including 17 patients with high-risk bacteria and 20 patients with low-risk bacteria.
| 37 | 17 | 20 | ||
| 59.8 (± 2.6) | 59,3 (± 4,2)* | 60,3 (± 3,5)* | *0.3 | |
| 68 | 70.6* | 40* | *0.7 | |
| 12.3 (± 1.0) | 13,0 (± 1,5)* | 11,5 (± 1,5)* | *0.20 | |
| 37.3 (± 0.18) | 37,5 (± 0,2)* | 37,0 (± 0,3)* | *0.45 | |
| 154.9 (± 29.5) | 152,6 (± 28,9)* | 157,9 (± 58,9)* | *0.51 | |
| 15 (41%) | 10 (59)* | 5 (25) * | *0.05 | |
| 266.8 (± 21.5) | 244,5 (± 33,9)* | 284,6 (± 27,9)* | *0.4 | |
| 6 (± 0.35) | 6,2 (± 0,4)* | 5,0 (± 0,4)* | *0.24 | |
| 84,4 (± 3,2) | 83,6 (± 4,1)* | 87,3(± 1,6)* | *0,71 | |
| 8.1 | 5.9* | 10* | *1.0 |
*p- value between patients with high-risk and low-risk bacteria.
Recovered bacteria in Mini-BAL from 37 HAP patients (≥ 103 CFU/ml).
| High-risk bacteria | |
| • | 9 |
| • | 7 |
| • | 1 |
| Low-risk bacteria | |
| • | 4 |
| • | 3 |
| • | 2 |
| • | 2 |
| • β-hemolytic | 2 |
| • | 1 |
| • | 1 |
| • | 1 |
| • | 1 |
| • | 1 |
| • | 1 |
| • | 1 |
* PCR
MMP, TIMP, MMP-9 activity and molar ratio in patients with HAP and control patients.
| Control group (n = 18) | 24 (± 7) | HAP vs. control | 0.346 |
| All HAP patients (n = 37) | 435 (± 131) | ||
| HAP subgroups | |||
| • Bacteria | high vs. low risk | 0.002 | |
| ○ high-risk bacteria (n = 17) | 750 (± 245) | high vs. control | 0.0007 |
| ○ low-risk bacteria (n = 20) | 167 (± 93) | low vs. control | 0.198 |
| • invasive ventilation | |||
| ○ ventilated (n = 15) | 891 (± 266) | vent. vs. not vent. | <0.0001 |
| ○ not ventilated (n = 22) | 124 (± 77) | ||
| Control group (n = 18) | 50 (± 17)* | HAP vs. control | 0.059 |
| All HAP patients (n = 37) | 657 (± 157)* | ||
| HAP subgroups | |||
| • Bacteria | high vs. low risk | <0.0001 | |
| ○ high-risk bacteria (n = 17) | 1168 (± 266)** | high vs. control | <0.0001 |
| ○ low-risk bacteria (n = 20) | 224 (± 119)** | low vs. control | 0.497 |
| • invasive ventilation | |||
| ○ ventilated (n = 15) | 1309 (± 266)*** | vent. vs. not vent. | <0.0001 |
| ○ not ventilated (n = 22) | 213 (± 131)*** | ||
| Control group (n = 18) | 34 (± 11)* | HAP vs. control | 0.0001 |
| All HAP patients (n = 37) | 149 (± 41)* | ||
| HAP subgroups | |||
| • Bacteria | high vs. low risk | 0.0001 | |
| ○ high-risk bacteria (n = 17) | 325 (± 106)** | high vs. control | <0.0001 |
| ○ low-risk bacteria (n = 20) | 67 (± 14)** | low vs. control | 0.007 |
| • invasive ventilation | |||
| ○ ventilated (n = 15) | 197 (± 40)*** | vent. vs. not vent. | 0.0024 |
| ○ not ventilated (n = 22) | 118 (± 63)*** | ||
| Control group (n = 18) | 410 (± 80)* | HAP vs. control | 0.275 |
| All HAP patients (n = 37) | 648 (± 164)* | ||
| HAP subgroups | |||
| • Bacteria | high vs. low risk | 0.0039 | |
| ○ high-risk bacteria (n = 17) | 983 (± 285)** | high vs. control | 0.290 |
| ○ low-risk bacteria (n = 20) | 364 (± 165)** | low vs. control | 0.005 |
| • invasive ventilation | |||
| ○ ventilated (n = 15) | 1309 (± 261)*** | vent. vs. not vent. | <0.0001 |
| ○ not ventilated (n = 22) | 132 (± 40)*** | ||
| Control group (n = 18) | 0.04 (± 0.02)* | HAP vs. control | <0.0001 |
| All HAP patients (n = 37) | 0.43 (± 0.12)* | ||
| HAP subgroups | |||
| • Bacteria | high vs. low risk | 0.0002 | |
| ○ high-risk bacteria (n = 17) | 0.66 (± 0.17)** | high vs. control | <0.0001 |
| ○ low-risk bacteria (n = 20) | 0.24 (± 0.15)** | low vs. control | 0.0028 |
| • invasive ventilation | |||
| ○ ventilated (n = 15) | 0.66 (± 0.23)*** | vent. vs. not vent. | 0.0046 |
| ○ not ventilated (n = 22) | 0.28 (± 0.12)*** | ||
Subgroups according to high/low-risk bacteria and artificial ventilation.
Figure 2MMP-8, MMP-9 and TIMP-1 concentration in mini-BAL from HAP patients and controls. Group 1 = HAP patients with high risk bacteria; group 2 = HAP patients with low-risk bacteria; group 3 = control patients (Mean and SEM).
Figure 3MMP-8 (A), MMP-9 (B) and TIMP-1 (C) concentration in mini-BAL from patients with high-risk and low-risk bacteria in association with artificial ventilation. V = ventilated, NV = not ventilated.
Figure 4Correlation of MMP-8 (A), MMP-9 (B) and TIMP-1 (C) concentration in mini-BAL with serum CRP in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia.