| Literature DB >> 18698425 |
María E Sáez1, José L González-Sánchez, Reposo Ramírez-Lorca, María T Martínez-Larrad, Carina Zabena, Alejandro González, Francisco J Morón, Agustín Ruiz, Manuel Serrano-Ríos.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the industrialized world. Familial aggregation of cardiovascular risk factors is a frequent finding, but genetic factors affecting its presentation are still poorly understood. The calpain 10 gene (CAPN10) has been associated with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), a complex metabolic disorder with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Moreover, the CAPN10 gene has been associated with the presence of metabolic syndrome (MS) in T2DM and in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). In this work, we have analysed whether the polymorphisms UCSNP44, -43, -19 and -63 are related to several cardiovascular risk factors in the context of MS. Molecular analysis of CAPN10 gene was performed in 899 individuals randomly chosen from a cross-sectional population-based epidemiological survey. We have found that CAPN10 gene in our population is mainly associated with two indicators of the presence of insulin resistance: glucose levels two hours after a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and HOMA values, although cholesterol levels and blood pressure values are also influenced by CAPN10 variants. In addition, the 1221/1121 haplogenotype is under-represented in individuals that fulfil the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) diagnostic criteria for MS. Our results suggest that CAPN10 gene is associated with insulin resistance phenotypes in the Spanish population.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18698425 PMCID: PMC2495037 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002953
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Baseline characteristics of study subjects.
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 53.49 | 11.73 | 54.51 | 11.64 |
|
| 27.56 | 3.33 | 27.63 | 4.70 |
|
| 95.36 | 8.96 | 85.56 | 11.20 |
|
| 126.65 | 16.58 | 124.75 | 19.46 |
|
| 78.79 | 9.12 | 77.78 | 9.99 |
|
| 5.26 | 1.68 | 4.89 | 1.28 |
|
| 5.97 | 2.31 | 6.19 | 2.23 |
|
| 78.24 | 48.54 | 79.68 | 59.46 |
|
| 3.07 | 2.10 | 3.07 | 2.97 |
|
| 1.31 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.54 |
|
| 5.61 | 1.04 | 5.52 | 1.05 |
|
| 1.39 | 0.41 | 1.63 | 0.47 |
|
| 3.62 | 0.94 | 3.44 | 0.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 142 | 33.3 | 73 | 15.5 |
|
| 237 | 55.5 | 312 | 66.2 |
|
| 347 | 81.3 | 184 | 39 |
|
| 37 | 8.7 | 36 | 7.9 |
|
| 69 | 17 | 108 | 23.9 |
|
| 90 | 21.8 | 121 | 26.8 |
Genotype distribution at CAPN10 UCSNP44, -43, -19 and -63 sites and analysis of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE).
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 11 | 12 | 22 | |||
|
| 0.85 | 637 (71.9%) | 226 (25.5%) | 23 (2.6%) | 0.604 |
|
| 0.74 | 495 (56.6%) | 311 (35.6%) | 68 (7.8%) | 0.062 |
|
| 0.36 | 120 (13.7%) | 396 (45.3%) | 359 (41.0%) | 0.511 |
|
| 0.95 | 795 (90.3%) | 77 (8.8%) | 8 (0.9%) | 0.002 |
Allele nomenclature according to Horikawa et al. [1] and Evans et al. [34]
Genotypic association analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3.3 |
| ||
|
| 5.89 | <0.01 | 3.1 |
| ||
|
| 5.58 | <0.01 | - | Ns | ||
|
| 4.75 | 0.01 | 3.0 |
| ||
|
|
| 3.1 |
| |||
|
| 5.39 | <0.01 | 2.8 |
| ||
|
| 5.75 | <0.01 | - | Ns | ||
|
| 6.01 | <0.01 | 2.8 |
| ||
|
|
|
| 4.9 | 0.052 | ||
|
| 2.77 | 0.03 | 5 |
| ||
|
| 2.42 | 0.04 | 5 |
| ||
|
| 2.58 | 0.12 | - | Ns | ||
|
|
| 4.6 | 0.055 | |||
|
| 2.62 | 0.03 | - | Ns | ||
|
| 2.64 | 0.04 | - | Ns | ||
|
| 3.22 | 0.07 | 4.7 |
| ||
|
|
| 4.7 |
| |||
|
| 2.41 | 0.05 | - | Ns | ||
|
| 2.59 | 0.03 | - | Ns | ||
|
| 2.84 | 0.03 | 4.7 |
| ||
|
|
|
| 2.4 |
| ||
|
| 124.14 | 1.49 | - | Ns | ||
|
| 120.44 | 0.86 | 2.5 |
| ||
|
| 123.01 | 0.86 | - | Ns | ||
|
|
|
| 1.1 |
| ||
|
| 78.30 | 0.89 | - | Ns | ||
|
| 75.98 | 0.51 | 1.1 |
| ||
|
| 77.56 | 0.51 | - | Ns | ||
|
|
|
| 0.5 | 0.098 | ||
|
| 5.51 | 0.05 | 0.6 |
| ||
|
| 5.80 | 0.13 | 0.5 |
| ||
|
| 5.71 | 0.43 | - | Ns | ||
|
|
|
| 1.9 | 0.060 | ||
|
| 3.47 | 0.01 | - | Ns | ||
|
| 3.62 | 0.06 | 2.1 |
| ||
|
| 3.44 | 0.06 | - | Ns | ||
|
|
| 1.4 | 0.079 | |||
|
| 3.51 | 0.04 | 1.5 |
| ||
|
| 3.78 | 0.12 | 1.5 |
| ||
|
| 3.58 | 0.38 | - | Ns |
Only the association studies which obtained a p value under 0.05 are shown. SE: standard error; Ns: Not significant. All values are adjusted by age, sex, alcohol consumption, smoking, physical activity and BMI.
Haplotypic frequencies and association analysis with OGTT values in Spanish population
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1121 | 0,37 | 270 | 3,10 (2,94 −3,27) | 1 (Reference) | - |
| 1221 | 0,25 | 183 | 3,14 (2,95 −3,33) | −0,04 (−0,23–0,30) | 0.762 |
| 2111 | 0,15 | 110 | 2,80 (2,53 −3,07) | −0,30 (−0,63– −0,02) |
|
| 1111 | 0,16 | 117 | 2,95 (2,68 −3,22) | −0,15 (−0,50–0,19) | 0.289 |
| 1112 | 0,06 | 43 | 2,70 (2,24 −3,17) | −0,40 (−0,91–0,11) | 0.145 |
F: population frequency.
Haplogenotypic association analysis.
| Haplogenotype | N | % | Glc120 | HOMA | INSULIN | SBP | CHOLESTEROL | LDL-cHOLESTEROL | ||||||||||||
| MEAN | SE | P value | MEAN | SE | P value | MEAN | SE | P value | MEAN | SE | P value | MEAN | SE | P value | MEAN | SE | P value | |||
|
| 147 | 17.11 | 5.96 | <0.01 | - | 2.80 | <0.01 | - | 71.07 | 0.05 | - | 123.93 | 1.40 | - | 3.20 | 0.04 |
| 5.36 | 0.09 |
|
| 1121/1121 | 137 | 15.95 | 6.06 | <0.01 | - | 2.78 | <0.01 | - | 68.71 | 0.05 | - | 124.79 | 1.59 | - | 3.23 | 0.04 | - | 5.52 | 0.09 | - |
| 1121/1111 | 104 | 12.11 | 6.15 | <0.01 | - | 2.76 | <0.01 | - | 67.20 | 0.05 | - | 118.80 | 1.51 | - | 3.07 | 0.04 | - | 5.64 | 0.11 | - |
|
| 96 | 11.18 | 5.59 | <0.01 | - | 2.38 | <0.01 |
| 62.03 | 0.07 |
| 120.90 | 1.85 | - | 3.13 | 0.05 | - | 5.56 | 0.12 | - |
| 1221/1221 | 84 | 9.78 | 6.00 | <0.01 | - | 3.08 | 0.01 | - | 71.47 | 0.07 | - | 122.63 | 1.97 | - | 3.17 | 0.05 | - | 5.76 | 0.13 | - |
|
| 68 | 7.92 | 6.02 | <0.01 | - | 2.63 | 0.01 | - | 67.46 | 0.07 | - | 119.86 | 2.04 |
| 3.10 | 0.05 | - | 5.68 | 0.14 | - |
| 1221/1111 | 55 | 6.40 | 5.86 | <0.01 | - | 2.78 | 0.01 | - | 73.89 | 0.12 | - | 121.19 | 2.66 | - | 3.13 | 0.07 | - | 5.32 | 0.19 | - |
|
| 45 | 5.24 | 5.77 | <0.01 | - | 2.39 | 0.01 | - | 65.21 | 0.10 | - | 126.33 | 3.05 |
| 3.27 | 0.08 |
| 5.20 | 0.15 |
|
| 1121/1112 | 32 | 3.73 | 5.87 | 0.01 | - | 2.65 | 0.01 | - | 68.26 | 0.22 | - | 122.38 | 2.72 | - | 3.16 | 0.07 | - | 5.54 | 0.13 | - |
|
| 23 | 2.68 | 4.98 | 0.01 |
| 2.82 | 0.02 | - | 70.72 | 0.45 | - | 123.03 | 4.41 | - | 3.18 | 0.11 | - | 5.54 | 0.20 | - |
| 1221/1112 | 21 | 2.44 | 5.33 | 0.01 | - | 2.21 | 0.01 | - | 64.61 | 0.33 | - | 118.35 | 3.75 | - | 3.06 | 0.10 | - | 5.87 | 0.25 | - |
| 1111/1111 | 17 | 1.98 | 5.63 | 0.01 | - | 2.36 | 0.02 | - | 63.19 | 0.36 | - | 125.82 | 5.12 | - | 3.25 | 0.13 | - | 5.67 | 0.34 | - |
| 1112/1111 | 12 | 1.40 | 4.75 | 0.01 | - | 2.37 | 0.03 | - | 49.31 | 0.23 | - | 123.70 | 4.78 | - | 3.20 | 0.12 | - | 5.81 | 0.37 | - |
| 2111/1112 | 10 | 1.16 | 5.05 | 0.02 | - | 2.41 | 0.04 | - | 67.39 | 0.89 | - | 118.55 | 4.23 | - | 3.07 | 0.11 | - | 5.91 | 0.30 | - |
| 1112/1112 | 8 | 0.93 | 6.08 | 0.01 | - | 2.24 | 0.03 | - | 63.67 | 0.70 | - | 122.21 | 5.89 | - | 3.16 | 0.15 | - | 5.74 | 0.46 | - |
Results are given as p-values. Numbers in brackets represents the percentages of increase or decrease of the phenotypic mean with respect to the remaining haplotypes. All values are adjusted by age, sex, alcohol consumption, smoking, physical activity and BMI.
Analysis of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) at UCSNP63 locus in different populations.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| This report |
| 550 (546) | 55 (63) | 6 (2) |
|
|
| 69 (69) | 4 (4) | 0 (0) | 1.0 | ||
|
| 189 (188) | 19 (23) | 2 (1) | 0.115 | ||
|
| 795 (790) | 77 (88) | 8 (3) |
| ||
|
| Kang |
| 200 (185) | 132 (161) | 50 (35) |
|
|
| Xu |
| 179 (177) | 112 (115) | 21 (19) | 0.5433 |
|
| Orho-Melander |
| 258 (255) | 34 (39) | 4 (1) |
|
|
| 313 (311) | 70 (73) | 6 (4) | 0.4133 | ||
|
| 571 (567) | 104 (113) | 10 (6) | 0.0578 | ||
|
| Lynn |
| 115 (116) | 29 (28) | 1 (2) | 1.0000 |
|
| 106 (103) | 28 (34) | 6 (3) |
| ||
|
| 221 (218) | 57 (62) | 7 (4) | 0.1703 | ||
FA: familial antecedents of T2DM.