Literature DB >> 18697870

Controlled ovarian stimulation induces a functional genomic delay of the endometrium with potential clinical implications.

José A Horcajadas1, Pablo Mínguez, Joaquín Dopazo, Francisco J Esteban, Francisco Domínguez, Linda C Giudice, Antonio Pellicer, Carlos Simón.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Controlled ovarian stimulation induces morphological, biochemical, and functional genomic modifications of the human endometrium during the window of implantation.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare the gene expression profile of the human endometrium in natural vs. controlled ovarian stimulation cycles throughout the early-mid secretory transition using microarray technology.
METHOD: Microarray data from 49 endometrial biopsies obtained from LH+1 to LH+9 (n=25) in natural cycles and from human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) +1 to hCG+9 in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles (n=24) were analyzed using different methods, such as clustering, profiling of biological processes, and selection of differentially expressed genes, as implemented in Gene Expression Pattern Analysis Suite and Babelomics programs.
RESULTS: Endometria from natural cycles followed different genomic patterns compared with controlled ovarian stimulation cycles in the transition from the pre-receptive (days LH/hCG+1 until LH/hCG+5) to the receptive phase (day LH+7/hCG+7). Specifically, we have demonstrated the existence of a 2-d delay in the activation/repression of two clusters composed by 218 and 133 genes, respectively, on day hCG+7 vs. LH+7. Many of these delayed genes belong to the class window of implantation genes affecting basic biological processes in the receptive endometrium.
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that gene expression profiling of the endometrium is different between natural and controlled ovarian stimulation cycles in the receptive phase. Identification of these differentially regulated genes can be used to understand the different developmental profiles of receptive endometrium during controlled ovarian stimulation and to search for the best controlled ovarian stimulation treatment in terms of minimal endometrial impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18697870     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2008-0588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  50 in total

1.  Research resource: interactome of human embryo implantation: identification of gene expression pathways, regulation, and integrated regulatory networks.

Authors:  Signe Altmäe; Jüri Reimand; Outi Hovatta; Pu Zhang; Juha Kere; Triin Laisk; Merli Saare; Maire Peters; Jaak Vilo; Anneli Stavreus-Evers; Andres Salumets
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2011-11-10

2.  Different ART outcomes at increasing peak estradiol levels with long and antagonist protocols: retrospective insights from ten years experience.

Authors:  Massimo Manno; Marta Cervi; Donatella Zadro; Giuseppa Fuggetta; Valter Adamo; Francesco Tomei
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Superovulation alters the expression of endometrial genes critical to tissue remodeling and placentation.

Authors:  Suneeta Senapati; Fan Wang; Teri Ord; Christos Coutifaris; Rui Feng; Monica Mainigi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Effects of adipocyte-secreted factors on decidualized endometrial cells: modulation of endometrial receptivity in vitro.

Authors:  Silvia Gamundi-Segura; Jose Serna; Sergio Oehninger; Jose A Horcajadas; Jose M Arbones-Mainar
Journal:  J Physiol Biochem       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 4.158

5.  Endometrial signaling pathways during ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction technology.

Authors:  Laura Detti; Rebecca A Uhlmann; Nicole M Fletcher; Michael P Diamond; Ghassan M Saed
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Gonadotropin dose is negatively correlated with live birth rate: analysis of more than 650,000 assisted reproductive technology cycles.

Authors:  Valerie L Baker; Morton B Brown; Barbara Luke; George W Smith; James J Ireland
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 7.  Preparation of endometrium for frozen embryo replacement cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hakan Yarali; Mehtap Polat; Sezcan Mumusoglu; Irem Yarali; Gurkan Bozdag
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Dynamic Expression of Interleukin-33 and ST2 in the Mouse Reproductive Tract Is Influenced by Superovulation.

Authors:  Salma Begum; Barry E Perlman; Nuriban Valero-Pacheco; Valerie O'Besso; Tracy Wu; Sara S Morelli; Aimee M Beaulieu; Nataki C Douglas
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 9.  Biomarkers in reproductive medicine: the promise, and can it be fulfilled?

Authors:  Stephen S Palmer; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Characterization of secreted proteins of 2-cell mouse embryos cultured in vitro to the blastocyst stage with and without protein supplementation.

Authors:  Tanya Burch; Liang Yu; Julius Nyalwidhe; Jose A Horcajadas; Silvina Bocca; R James Swanson; Sergio Oehninger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.