Literature DB >> 18697557

The development and testing of a digital PET phantom for the evaluation of tumor volume segmentation techniques.

Michalis Aristophanous1, Bill C Penney, Charles A Pelizzari.   

Abstract

Methods for accurate tumor volume segmentation of positron emission tomography (PET) images have been under investigation in recent years partly as a result of the increased use of PET in radiation treatment planning (RTP). None of the developed automated or semiautomated segmentation methods, however, has been shown reliable enough to be regarded as the standard. One reason for this is that there is no source of well characterized and reliable test data for evaluating such techniques. The authors have constructed a digital tumor phantom to address this need. The phantom was created using the Zubal phantom as input to the SimSET software used for PET simulations. Synthetic tumors were placed in the lung of the Zubal phantom to provide the targets for segmentation. The authors concentrated on the lung, since much of the interest to include PET in RTP is for nonsmall cell lung cancer. Several tests were performed on the phantom to ensure its close resemblance to clinical PET scans. The authors measured statistical quantities to compare image intensity distributions from regions-of-interest (ROIs) placed in the liver, the lungs, and tumors in phantom and clinical reconstructions. Using ROIs they also made measurements of autocorrelation functions to ensure the image texture is similar in clinical and phantom data. The authors also compared the intensity profile and appearance of real and simulated uniform activity spheres within uniform background. These measurements, along with visual comparisons of the phantom with clinical scans, indicate that the simulated phantom mimics reality quite well. Finally, they investigate and quantify the relationship between the threshold required to segment a tumor and the inhomogeneity of the tumor's image intensity distribution. The tests and various measurements performed in this study demonstrate how the phantom can offer a reliable way of testing and investigating tumor volume segmentation in PET.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18697557     DOI: 10.1118/1.2938518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  10 in total

Review 1.  PET-guided delineation of radiation therapy treatment volumes: a survey of image segmentation techniques.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Delineation of FDG-PET tumors from heterogeneous background using spectral clustering.

Authors:  Fei Yang; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Does running cause metatarsophalangeal joint effusions? A comparison of synovial fluid volumes on MRI in athletes before and after running.

Authors:  Amy-Rose Kingston; Andoni P Toms; Subhadip Ghosh-Ray; Shelley Johnston-Downing
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  SUV and segmentation: pressing challenges in tumour assessment and treatment.

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  What is the best way to contour lung tumors on PET scans? Multiobserver validation of a gradient-based method using a NSCLC digital PET phantom.

Authors:  Maria Werner-Wasik; Arden D Nelson; Walter Choi; Yoshio Arai; Peter F Faulhaber; Patrick Kang; Fabio D Almeida; Ying Xiao; Nitin Ohri; Kristin D Brockway; Jonathan W Piper; Aaron S Nelson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  The first MICCAI challenge on PET tumor segmentation.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; Baptiste Laurent; Anouar Ouahabi; Hadi Fayad; Shan Tan; Laquan Li; Wei Lu; Vincent Jaouen; Clovis Tauber; Jakub Czakon; Filip Drapejkowski; Witold Dyrka; Sorina Camarasu-Pop; Frédéric Cervenansky; Pascal Girard; Tristan Glatard; Michael Kain; Yao Yao; Christian Barillot; Assen Kirov; Dimitris Visvikis
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  A segmentation framework towards automatic generation of boost subvolumes for FDG-PET tumors: a digital phantom study.

Authors:  Fei Yang; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Artificial Neural Network-Based System for PET Volume Segmentation.

Authors:  Mhd Saeed Sharif; Maysam Abbod; Abbes Amira; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2010-09-26

9.  Sensitivity analysis of FDG PET tumor voxel cluster radiomics and dosimetry for predicting mid-chemoradiation regional response of locally advanced lung cancer.

Authors:  Chunyan Duan; W Art Chaovalitwongse; Fangyun Bai; Daniel S Hippe; Shouyi Wang; Phawis Thammasorn; Larry A Pierce; Xiao Liu; Jianxin You; Robert S Miyaoka; Hubert J Vesselle; Paul E Kinahan; Ramesh Rengan; Jing Zeng; Stephen R Bowen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Prognostic Value of Early Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography Response Imaging and Peripheral Immunologic Biomarkers: Substudy of a Phase II Trial of Risk-Adaptive Chemoradiation for Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Stephen R Bowen; Daniel S Hippe; Hannah M Thomas; Balukrishna Sasidharan; Paul D Lampe; Christina S Baik; Keith D Eaton; Sylvia Lee; Renato G Martins; Rafael Santana-Davila; Delphine L Chen; Paul E Kinahan; Robert S Miyaoka; Hubert J Vesselle; A McGarry Houghton; Ramesh Rengan; Jing Zeng
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-11-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.