Literature DB >> 18695470

Long-term outcome of acellular dermal matrix when used for large traumatic open abdomen.

Marc A de Moya1, Michael Dunham, Kenji Inaba, Hany Bahouth, Hasan B Alam, Babar Sultan, Nicholas Namias.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to prospectively examine the use of Human Acellular Dermal Matrix (HADM) in trauma patients with large open abdominal wounds and assess the long-term outcome. Previous studies have not examined the long-term outcomes in trauma patients with abdominal wall reconstructions.
METHODS: An institutional review board approved prospective case series of consecutive patients admitted to a level I university trauma center, who were unable to have their abdomen closed primarily after trauma laparotomy. These patients had HADM placed to attain closure of the abdomen with skin advancement flaps to cover the HADM when possible. Our primary outcome measure was hernia formation and our secondary outcomes were laxity, fistulae, and infections associated with HADM.
RESULTS: Ten patients were enrolled during a 1-year period. Mean time to HADM placement was 17.2 days +/- 3.6 days. Mean initial defect size was 425.1 cm2 +/- 75.9 cm2 with the largest 770 cm2. Thirty day follow-up showed no recurrence in 100% patients. Six patients remained for long-term follow-up. Follow-up at 60 days demonstrated significant laxity or recurrent hernia or both in 67% of patients, and this increased to 100% by the end of 1 year follow-up. There were no bowel fistulae in these patients closed with HADM but 20% with infection.
CONCLUSIONS: HADM is an alternative available to reconstruct the unclosable open abdomen with no fistulae formation, however, it is associated with a high rate of laxity in large abdominal wounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18695470     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31817fb782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  23 in total

Review 1.  Long-term outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction. what are the real numbers?

Authors:  Ruben Peralta; Rifat Latifi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Does size matter? Technical considerations of a regenerative tissue matrix for use in reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Randall O Craft; Alanna M Rebecca; Colleen Flahive; William J Casey; Amylou Dueck; Kristi L Harold
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2011

Review 3.  "Acute postoperative open abdominal wall": Nosological concept and treatment implications.

Authors:  Manuel López-Cano; José A Pereira; Manuel Armengol-Carrasco
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-12-27

4.  Abdominal wall reconstruction in patients with digestive tract fistulas.

Authors:  Eric K Johnson; Pamela L Tushoski
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-09

Review 5.  EHS clinical guidelines on the management of the abdominal wall in the context of the open or burst abdomen.

Authors:  M López-Cano; J M García-Alamino; S A Antoniou; D Bennet; U A Dietz; F Ferreira; R H Fortelny; P Hernandez-Granados; M Miserez; A Montgomery; S Morales-Conde; F Muysoms; J A Pereira; R Schwab; N Slater; A Vanlander; G H Van Ramshorst; F Berrevoet
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Abdominal wall reconstruction by combined use of biological mesh and autogenous pedicled demucosalized small intestinal sheet: a case report.

Authors:  Y Wu; J Ren; S Liu; G Han; Y Zhao; J Li
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 7.  Biologic versus Synthetic Mesh Reinforcement: What are the Pros and Cons?

Authors:  James F FitzGerald; Anjali S Kumar
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-12

8.  Dermal collagen matrices for ventral hernia repair: comparative analysis in a rat model.

Authors:  G Broderick; J McIntyre; M Noury; H M Strom; C Psoinos; A Christakas; K Billiar; Z M Hurwitz; J F Lalikos; R A Ignotz; R M Dunn
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Enterocutaneous fistulas and a hostile abdomen: reoperative surgical approaches.

Authors:  R Latifi; B Joseph; N Kulvatunyou; J L Wynne; T O'Keeffe; A Tang; R Friese; P M Rhee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Quality of life after abdominal wall reconstruction following open abdomen.

Authors:  Ben L Zarzaur; Jennifer M DiCocco; Charles P Shahan; Katrina Emmett; Louis J Magnotti; Martin A Croce; Donna K Hathaway; Timothy C Fabian
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2011-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.