Literature DB >> 18693947

Indexing of diagnosis accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.

Nancy L Wilczynski1, R Brian Haynes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: STAndards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) were published in 2003 and endorsed by some journals but not others.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the quality of indexing of diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE has improved since the STARD statement was published.
DESIGN: Evaluate the change in the mean number of "accurate index terms" assigned to diagnostic accuracy studies, comparing STARD (endorsing) and non-STARD (non-endorsing) journals, for 2 years before and after STARD publication.
RESULTS: In MEDLINE, no differences in indexing quality were found for STARD and non-STARD journals before or after the STARD statement was published in 2003. In EMBASE, indexing in STARD journals improved compared with non-STARD journals (p = 0.02). However, articles in STARD journals had half the number of accurate indexing terms as articles in non-STARD journals, both before and after STARD statement publication (p < 0.001).

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18693947      PMCID: PMC2813664     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  7 in total

1.  Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation.

Authors:  D Moher; A Jones; L Lepage
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-04-18       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet; Jeroen G Lijmer
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  The STARD initiative.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-01-04       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Medline: analytical survey.

Authors:  R Brian Haynes; Nancy L Wilczynski
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-04-08

5.  Obstacles to answering doctors' questions about patient care with evidence: qualitative study.

Authors:  John W Ely; Jerome A Osheroff; Mark H Ebell; M Lee Chambliss; Daniel C Vinson; James J Stevermer; Eric A Pifer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-23

6.  A qualitative study of evidence in primary care: what the practitioners are saying.

Authors:  Wayne Putnam; Peter L Twohig; Frederick I Burge; Lois A Jackson; Jafna L Cox
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  EMBASE search strategies for identifying methodologically sound diagnostic studies for use by clinicians and researchers.

Authors:  Nancy L Wilczynski; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 8.775

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Optimizing a literature surveillance strategy to retrieve sound overall prognosis and risk assessment model papers.

Authors:  Patricia L Kavanagh; Francine Frater; Tamara Navarro; Peter LaVita; Rick Parrish; Alfonso Iorio
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.

Authors:  Rebecca Beynon; Mariska M G Leeflang; Steve McDonald; Anne Eisinga; Ruth L Mitchell; Penny Whiting; Julie M Glanville
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-09-11

3.  C-reactive protein for diagnosing late-onset infection in newborn infants.

Authors:  Jennifer Valeska Elli Brown; Nicholas Meader; Jemma Cleminson; William McGuire
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.