Literature DB >> 19657926

Interactive graphics for expressing health risks: development and qualitative evaluation.

Jessica S Ancker1, Connie Chan, Rita Kukafka.   

Abstract

Recent findings suggest that interactive game-like graphics might be useful in communicating probabilities. We developed a prototype for a risk communication module, focusing on eliciting users' preferences for different interactive graphics and assessing usability and user interpretations. Feedback from five focus groups was used to design the graphics. The final version displayed a matrix of square buttons; clicking on any button allowed the user to see whether the stick figure underneath was affected by the health outcome. When participants used this interaction to learn about a risk, they expressed more emotional responses, both positive and negative, than when viewing any static graphic or numerical description of a risk. Their responses included relief about small risks and concern about large risks. The groups also commented on static graphics: arranging the figures affected by disease randomly throughout a group of figures made it more difficult to judge the proportion affected but often was described as more realistic. Interactive graphics appear to have potential for expressing risk magnitude as well as the feeling of risk. This affective impact could be useful in increasing perceived threat of high risks, calming fears about low risks, or comparing risks. Quantitative studies are planned to assess the effect on perceived risks and estimated risk magnitudes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19657926      PMCID: PMC4423614          DOI: 10.1080/10810730903032960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  38 in total

1.  Risk as feelings.

Authors:  G F Loewenstein; E U Weber; C K Hsee; N Welch
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Distrust, race, and research.

Authors:  Giselle Corbie-Smith; Stephen B Thomas; Diane Marie M St George
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-11-25

3.  How informed is consent? Understanding of pictorial and verbal probability information by medical inpatients.

Authors:  R Fuller; N Dudley; J Blacktop
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Tailored computer-based cancer risk communication: correcting colorectal cancer risk perception.

Authors:  Karen M Emmons; Mei Wong; Elaine Puleo; Neil Weinstein; Robert Fletcher; Graham Colditz
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr

5.  Affect, risk, and decision making.

Authors:  Paul Slovic; Ellen Peters; Melissa L Finucane; Donald G Macgregor
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  The greater ability of graphical versus numerical displays to increase risk avoidance involves a common mechanism.

Authors:  James A Schirillo; Eric R Stone
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  Frequency or probability? A qualitative study of risk communication formats used in health care.

Authors:  M M Schapira; A B Nattinger; C A McHorney
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Effect of framing as gain versus loss on understanding and hypothetical treatment choices: survival and mortality curves.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong; J Sanford Schwartz; Genevieve Fitzgerald; Mary Putt; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Promoting informed choice: transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making.

Authors:  Steven H Woolf; Evelyn C Y Chan; Russell Harris; Stacey L Sheridan; Clarence H Braddock; Robert M Kaplan; Alex Krist; Annette M O'Connor; Sean Tunis
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Colon cancer: risk perceptions and risk communication.

Authors:  Neil D Weinstein; Kathy Atwood; Elaine Puleo; Robert Fletcher; Graham Colditz; Karen M Emmons
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb
View more
  19 in total

1.  Sometimes more is more: iterative participatory design of infographics for engagement of community members with varying levels of health literacy.

Authors:  Adriana Arcia; Niurka Suero-Tejeda; Michael E Bales; Jacqueline A Merrill; Sunmoo Yoon; Janet Woollen; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Effect of arrangement of stick figures on estimates of proportion in risk graphics.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; Elke U Weber; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Development and testing of a frailty-focused communication (FCOM) aid for older adults.

Authors:  Cathy A Maxwell; Russell Rothman; Ruth Wolever; Sandra Simmons; Mary S Dietrich; Richard Miller; Mayur Patel; Mohana B Karlekar; Sheila Ridner
Journal:  Geriatr Nurs       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.361

4.  Effects of game-like interactive graphics on risk perceptions and decisions.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; Elke U Weber; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Pictures speak louder than numbers: on communicating medical risks to immigrants with limited non-native language proficiency.

Authors:  Rocio Garcia-Retamero; Mandeep K Dhami
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  An information-centric framework for designing patient-centered medical decision aids and risk communication.

Authors:  Lyndsey Franklin; Catherine Plaisant; Ben Shneiderman
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16

7.  The impact of a decision support tool linked to an electronic medical record on glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Waruna Gunathilake; Sajith Gunawardena; Ranga Fernando; George Thomson; Devaka Fernando
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-05-01

8.  The impact of bone mineral density testing, fracture assessment, and osteoporosis education in men treated by androgen deprivation for prostate cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Michelle Nadler; Shabbir Alibhai; Pamela Catton; Charles Catton; Jennifer Jones
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 9.  Conceptual, methodological, and ethical problems in communicating uncertainty in clinical evidence.

Authors:  Paul K J Han
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.929

10.  EDUCORE project: a clinical trial, randomised by clusters, to assess the effect of a visual learning method on blood pressure control in the primary healthcare setting.

Authors:  Isidro Rodríguez-Salceda; Esperanza Escortell-Mayor; Milagros Rico-Blázquez; Rosario Riesgo-Fuertes; Angel Asúnsolo-del Barco; Antonio Valdivia-Pérez; Isabel del Cura-González; Ana B García-Cañón; María F Ortiz-Jiménez; Luisa Cabello-Ballesteros; Sofia Garrido-Elustondo; Laura Chamorro-González; Ricardo Rodríguez-Barrientos
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.