Literature DB >> 18693299

Graphical diagnostics to check model misspecification for the proportional odds regression model.

Ivy Liu1, Bhramar Mukherjee, Thomas Suesse, David Sparrow, Sung Kyun Park.   

Abstract

The cumulative logit or the proportional odds regression model is commonly used to study covariate effects on ordinal responses. This paper provides some graphical and numerical methods for checking the adequacy of the proportional odds regression model. The methods focus on evaluating functional misspecification for specific covariate effects, but misspecification of the link function can also be dealt with under the same framework. For the logistic regression model with binary responses, Arbogast and Lin (Statist. Med. 2005; 24:229-247) developed similar graphical and numerical methods for assessing the adequacy of the model using the cumulative sums of residuals. The paper generalizes their methods to ordinal responses and illustrates them using an example from the VA Normative Aging Study. Simulation studies comparing the performance of the different diagnostic methods indicate that some of the graphical methods are more powerful in detecting model misspecification than the Hosmer-Lemeshow-type goodness-of-fit statistics for the class of models studied. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18693299     DOI: 10.1002/sim.3386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  8 in total

1.  A new residual for ordinal outcomes.

Authors:  Chun Li; Bryan E Shepherd
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 2.445

2.  Regression analysis of ordinal stroke clinical trial outcomes: an application to the NINDS t-PA trial.

Authors:  Stacia M Desantis; Christos Lazaridis; Yuko Palesch; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 5.266

3.  Semiparametric odds rate model for modeling short-term and long-term effects with application to a breast cancer genetic study.

Authors:  Mengdie Yuan; Guoqing Diao
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.968

4.  Propensity score-based diagnostics for categorical response regression models.

Authors:  Philip S Boonstra; Irina Bondarenko; Sung Kyun Park; Pantel S Vokonas; Bhramar Mukherjee
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Residuals and Diagnostics for Ordinal Regression Models: A Surrogate Approach.

Authors:  Dungang Liu; Heping Zhang
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.033

6.  Two-part models for repeatedly measured ordinal data with "don't know" category.

Authors:  Ralitza Gueorguieva; Eugenia Buta; Meghan Morean; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  A hybrid approach for the analysis of complex categorical data structures: assessment of latent distance learning perception in higher education.

Authors:  Maria Iannario; Alfonso Iodice D'Enza; Rosaria Romano
Journal:  Comput Stat       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 1.405

8.  Bayesian inference for generalized linear mixed model based on the multivariate t distribution in population pharmacokinetic study.

Authors:  Fang-Rong Yan; Yuan Huang; Jun-Lin Liu; Tao Lu; Jin-Guan Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.