Literature DB >> 18691907

The integration of higher order form and motion by the human brain.

Pegah Sarkheil1, Quoc C Vuong, Heinrich H Bülthoff, Uta Noppeney.   

Abstract

Our experience with a dynamic environment has tuned our visual system to use form and motion as complementary sources of information for object recognition. To identify the neural systems involved in integrating form and motion information during dynamic object processing, we used an fMRI adaptation paradigm which factorially manipulated form and motion repetition. Observers were sequentially presented with pairs of rotating novel objects in which the form or rotation direction in depth could be repeated. They were required to discriminate either dimension of the second target object, while the first object served as a form and/or motion prime. At the behavioural level, observers were faster to recognize the target or discriminate its direction when primed by the same form. Importantly, this form priming effect was enhanced when prime and target objects rotated in the same direction. At the neural level, the two priming effects (i.e., the main effect of form repetition and the interaction between form and motion repetition) were associated with reduced activations in distinct brain regions. Bilateral lateral occipital regions exhibited reduced activation when form was repeated irrespective of rotation direction. In contrast, bilateral anterior fusiform and posterior middle temporal regions (overlapping with hMT+/V5) regions showed an adaptation effect that depended on both form and motion direction. Thus, the current results reveal a visual processing hierarchy with lateral occipito-temporal cortex representing an object's 3D structure, and anterior fusiform and posterior middle temporal regions being involved in spatio-temporal integration of form and motion during dynamic object processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18691907     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  9 in total

1.  The left occipitotemporal cortex does not show preferential activity for words.

Authors:  Alecia C Vogel; Steven E Petersen; Bradley L Schlaggar
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Response priming with apparent motion primes.

Authors:  Christina Bermeitinger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-04-20

3.  Eyes on me: an fMRI study of the effects of social gaze on action control.

Authors:  Leonhard Schilbach; Simon B Eickhoff; Edna Cieslik; Nadim J Shah; Gereon R Fink; Kai Vogeley
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Response priming with motion primes: negative compatibility or congruency effects, even in free-choice trials.

Authors:  Christina Bermeitinger; Ryan P Hackländer
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2018-02-24

5.  Movement kinematics affect action prediction: comparing human to non-human point-light actions.

Authors:  Waltraud Stadler; Anne Springer; Jim Parkinson; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-03-13

6.  The neural representation of objects formed through the spatiotemporal integration of visual transients.

Authors:  Gennady Erlikhman; Gennadiy Gurariy; Ryan E B Mruczek; Gideon P Caplovitz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Multisensory functional magnetic resonance imaging: a future perspective.

Authors:  Rainer Goebel; Nienke van Atteveldt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Automatic processing of unattended object features by functional connectivity.

Authors:  Katja M Mayer; Quoc C Vuong
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  The Visual Priming of Motion-Defined 3D Objects.

Authors:  Xiong Jiang; Yang Jiang; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.