Literature DB >> 18690359

Thrombolysis effect of a novel targeted microbubble with low-frequency ultrasound in vivo.

Bing Wang1, Li Wang, Xiao-Bo Zhou, Ya-Min Liu, Mei Wang, Hao Qin, Chong-Bao Wang, Ju Liu, Xiao-Jiang Yu, Wei-Jin Zang.   

Abstract

Clot-targeted microbubbles (TMB) were developed based on oligopeptide specific to the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor on active platelets. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the thrombolysis effect of this TMB in both intraarterial and intravenous application and compare the clot lysis efficiency of the TMB and untargeted microbubbles(UTMB) in presence of external low frequency ultrasound (LFUS) (800 kHz, 2.4 w/cm(2), pulse-wave). An acute arterial occlusion model was induced in rabbits by blocking the common carotid artery with an autogenous clot. Animals were randomized to five groups to receive the following treatment: 1) intra-arterial TMB and LFUS (IA TMB/LFUS); 2) intravenous TMB and LFUS (IV TMB/LFUS); 3) intravenous untargeted-microbubbles and LFUS (IV UTMB/LFUS); 4) LFUS only; 5) intra-arterial normal saline (NS) control. Declotting score and a variation of thrombolysis-in-myocardial-infarction (TIMI) flow scale were applied to assess clot clearance and flow restore according to the angiogram. IA TMB/LFUS treatment produced highest declotting score (3.5 +/- 0.53) and success rate (100%). IV TMB/LFUS treatment produced a higher declotting score (1.95 +/- 1.12) than LFUS treatment (0.53 +/- 0.38) (P = 0.026). and higher TIMI (1.94 +/- 0.62 vs. 0.47 +/- 0.44, P = 0.020). When administrated intravenously, TMB/LFUS created a higher declotting score (1.95 +/- 1.12) than that of UTMB/LFUS (0.61 +/- 0.43) (P = 0.033). The superiority was observed in TIMI also (1.94 +/- 0.62 vs. 0.72 +/- 0.25, P = 0.041). The results demonstrate that either intra-arterial or intravenous TMB is effective in clearing clot in-vivo model. The TMB showed advantage over UTMB in systemic administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18690359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  13 in total

Review 1.  Molecular imaging with contrast enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Scott M Chadderdon; Sanjiv Kaul
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Effects of low-frequency ultrasound combined with microbubbles on benign prostate hyperplasia.

Authors:  Shao-Ling Yang; Ke-Qiang Tang; Wen-Kun Bai; E Shen; Yi-Wen Zhao; Yan-Duan Lin; Shu-Liang Nan; Hu Bing
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Thrombolytic effects of a combined therapy with targeted microbubbles and ultrasound in a 6 h cerebral thrombosis rabbit model.

Authors:  Shu-Ting Ren; Li-Hui Long; Mei Wang; Yi-Ping Li; Hao Qin; Hui Zhang; Bo-Bin Jing; Ying-Xue Li; Wei-Jin Zang; Bing Wang; Xin-Liang Shen
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  In silico study of low-frequency transcranial ultrasound fields in acute ischemic stroke patients.

Authors:  Guillaume Bouchoux; Ravishankar Shivashankar; Todd A Abruzzo; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  The antitumor effect of a new docetaxel-loaded microbubble combined with low-frequency ultrasound in vitro: preparation and parameter analysis.

Authors:  Shu-Ting Ren; Yi-Ran Liao; Xiao-Ning Kang; Yi-Ping Li; Hui Zhang; Hong Ai; Qiang Sun; Jing Jing; Xing-Hua Zhao; Li-Fang Tan; Xin-Liang Shen; Bing Wang
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Construction of thrombus-targeted microbubbles carrying tissue plasminogen activator and their in vitro thrombolysis efficacy: a primary research.

Authors:  Xing Hua; Ping Liu; Yun-Hua Gao; Kai-Bin Tan; Li-Na Zhou; Zheng Liu; Xin Li; Shi-Wen Zhou; Yue-Juan Gao
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Experimental validation of a finite-difference model for the prediction of transcranial ultrasound fields based on CT images.

Authors:  Guillaume Bouchoux; Kenneth B Bader; Joseph J Korfhagen; Jason L Raymond; Ravishankar Shivashankar; Todd A Abruzzo; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Influences of microbubble diameter and ultrasonic parameters on in vitro sonothrombolysis efficacy.

Authors:  Michael J Borrelli; William D O'Brien; Eric Hamilton; Michael L Oelze; Jonah Wu; Laura J Bernock; Stephen Tung; Husein Rokadia; William C Culp
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  [Efficacy of combined ultrasound and microbubble treatment for thrombolysis for rescuing ischemic tissues in rats at different time after thrombosis].

Authors:  Xiaohong Peng; Hairui Li; Xiaoqiang Chen; Jiayuan Zhong; Jian Liu; Shiping Cao
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-08-30

10.  A pragmatic approach to sonothrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke: the Norwegian randomised controlled sonothrombolysis in acute stroke study (NOR-SASS).

Authors:  Aliona Nacu; Christopher E Kvistad; Nicola Logallo; Halvor Naess; Ulrike Waje-Andreassen; Anne Hege Aamodt; Ragnar Solhoff; Christian Lund; Håkon Tobro; Ole Morten Rønning; Rolf Salvesen; Titto T Idicula; Lars Thomassen
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 2.474

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.