Literature DB >> 18689838

Non-parametric estimation of posterior error probabilities associated with peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry.

Lukas Käll1, John D Storey, William Stafford Noble.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: A mass spectrum produced via tandem mass spectrometry can be tentatively matched to a peptide sequence via database search. Here, we address the problem of assigning a posterior error probability (PEP) to a given peptide-spectrum match (PSM). This problem is considerably more dif.cult than the related problem of estimating the error rate associated with a large collection of PSMs. Existing methods for estimating PEPs rely on a parametric or semiparametric model of the underlying score distribution.
RESULTS: We demonstrate how to apply non-parametric logistic regression to this problem. The method makes no explicit assumptions about the form of the underlying score distribution; instead, the method relies upon decoy PSMs, produced by searching the spectra against a decoy sequence database, to provide a model of the null score distribution. We show that our non-parametric logistic regression method produces accurate PEP estimates for six different commonly used PSM score functions. In particular, the estimates produced by our method are comparable in accuracy to those of PeptideProphet, which uses a parametric or semiparametric model designed speci.cally to work with SEQUEST. The advantage of the non-parametric approach is applicability and robustness to new score functions and new types of data. AVAILABILITY: C++ code implementing the method as well as supplementary information is available at http://noble.gs. washington.edu/proj/qvality

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18689838      PMCID: PMC2732210          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  23 in total

1.  Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search.

Authors:  Andrew Keller; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Eugene Kolker; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Intensity-based protein identification by machine learning from a library of tandem mass spectra.

Authors:  Joshua E Elias; Francis D Gibbons; Oliver D King; Frederick P Roth; Steven P Gygi
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2004-01-18       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies.

Authors:  John D Storey; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  OLAV: towards high-throughput tandem mass spectrometry data identification.

Authors:  Jacques Colinge; Alexandre Masselot; Marc Giron; Thierry Dessingy; Jérôme Magnin
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.984

5.  TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra.

Authors:  Robertson Craig; Ronald C Beavis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Peptide charge state determination for low-resolution tandem mass spectra.

Authors:  Aaron A Klammer; Christine C Wu; Michael J MacCoss; William Stafford Noble
Journal:  Proc IEEE Comput Syst Bioinform Conf       Date:  2005

7.  Lookup peaks: a hybrid of de novo sequencing and database search for protein identification by tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Marshall Bern; Yuhan Cai; David Goldberg
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 8.  Assigning significance to peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry using decoy databases.

Authors:  Lukas Käll; John D Storey; Michael J MacCoss; William Stafford Noble
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  Probability-based pattern recognition and statistical framework for randomization: modeling tandem mass spectrum/peptide sequence false match frequencies.

Authors:  Jian Feng; Daniel Q Naiman; Bret Cooper
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Multiple locus linkage analysis of genomewide expression in yeast.

Authors:  John D Storey; Joshua M Akey; Leonid Kruglyak
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-07-26       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  56 in total

1.  Target-decoy approach and false discovery rate: when things may go wrong.

Authors:  Nitin Gupta; Nuno Bandeira; Uri Keich; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Proteomic comparison defines novel markers to characterize heterogeneous populations of extracellular vesicle subtypes.

Authors:  Joanna Kowal; Guillaume Arras; Marina Colombo; Mabel Jouve; Jakob Paul Morath; Bjarke Primdal-Bengtson; Florent Dingli; Damarys Loew; Mercedes Tkach; Clotilde Théry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Nonparametric Bayesian evaluation of differential protein quantification.

Authors:  Oliver Serang; A Ertugrul Cansizoglu; Lukas Käll; Hanno Steen; Judith A Steen
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  Transferred subgroup false discovery rate for rare post-translational modifications detected by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Yan Fu; Xiaohong Qian
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Averaging Strategy To Reduce Variability in Target-Decoy Estimates of False Discovery Rate.

Authors:  Uri Keich; Kaipo Tamura; William Stafford Noble
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  Proteomic analysis of the soybean symbiosome identifies new symbiotic proteins.

Authors:  Victoria C Clarke; Patrick C Loughlin; Aleksandr Gavrin; Chi Chen; Ella M Brear; David A Day; Penelope M C Smith
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 5.911

7.  Skeletal muscle reprogramming by breast cancer regardless of treatment history or tumor molecular subtype.

Authors:  Hannah E Wilson; David A Stanton; Cortney Montgomery; Aniello M Infante; Matthew Taylor; Hannah Hazard-Jenkins; Elena N Pugacheva; Emidio E Pistilli
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-06-04

8.  The Vac14-interaction network is linked to regulators of the endolysosomal and autophagic pathway.

Authors:  Ulf Schulze; Beate Vollenbröker; Daniela A Braun; Truc Van Le; Daniel Granado; Joachim Kremerskothen; Benjamin Fränzel; Rafael Klosowski; Johannes Barth; Christian Fufezan; Dirk A Wolters; Hermann Pavenstädt; Thomas Weide
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 9.  A review of methods for interpretation of glycopeptide tandem mass spectral data.

Authors:  Han Hu; Kshitij Khatri; Joshua Klein; Nancy Leymarie; Joseph Zaia
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.916

10.  QVALITY: non-parametric estimation of q-values and posterior error probabilities.

Authors:  Lukas Käll; John D Storey; William Stafford Noble
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.