Literature DB >> 18685049

Pathogens isolated from deep soft tissue and bone in patients with diabetic foot infections.

M Bulent Ertugrul1, Selcuk Baktiroglu, Serpil Salman, Seher Unal, Murat Aksoy, Kezban Berberoglu, Semra Calangu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the similarity of pathogens isolated from soft tissue and bone in patients with diabetic foot infections. It is widely believed that soft-tissue cultures are adequate in the determination of causative bacteria in patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis. The culture results of specimens taken concurrently from soft-tissue and bone infections show that the former does not predict the latter with sufficient reliability. We sought to determine the similarity of pathogens isolated from soft tissue and bone in patients with diabetic foot infections.
METHODS: Forty-five patients with diabetic foot infections were enrolled in the study. Patients had to have clinically suspected foot lesions of grade 3 or higher on the Wagner classification system. In patients with clinically suspected osteomyelitis, magnetic resonance imaging, scintigraphy, or histopathologic examination were performed. Bone and deep soft tissue specimens were obtained from all patients by open surgical procedures under aseptic conditions during debridement or amputation. The specimens were compared only with the other specimens taken from the same patients.
RESULTS: The results of bone and soft-tissue cultures were identical in 49% (n = 22) of cases. In 11% (n = 5) of cases there were no common pathogens. In 29% (n = 13) of cases there were more pathogens in the soft-tissue specimens; these microorganisms included microbes isolated from bone cultures. In four patients (9%) with culture-positive soft-tissue specimens, bone culture specimens remained sterile. In one patient (2%) with culture-positive bone specimen, soft-tissue specimen remained sterile.
CONCLUSION: Culture specimens should be obtained from both the bone and the overlying deep soft tissue in patients with suspected osteomyelitis whose clinical conditions are suitable. The decision to administer antibiotic therapy should depend on these results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18685049     DOI: 10.7547/0980290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc        ISSN: 1930-8264


  10 in total

Review 1.  The microbiologic profile of diabetic foot infections in Turkey: a 20-year systematic review: diabetic foot infections in Turkey.

Authors:  M Hatipoglu; M Mutluoglu; G Uzun; E Karabacak; V Turhan; B A Lipsky
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  A prospective, multi-center study: factors related to the management of diabetic foot infections.

Authors:  B M Ertugrul; O Oncul; N Tulek; A Willke; S Sacar; O G Tunccan; E Yilmaz; O Kaya; B Ozturk; O Turhan; N Yapar; M Ture; F Akin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Metagenomics to Identify Pathogens in Diabetic Foot Ulcers and the Potential Impact for Clinical Care.

Authors:  Brian M Schmidt; John Erb-Downward; Piyush Ranjan; Robert Dickson
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.810

4.  Emerging Diabetic Foot Ulcer Microbiome Analysis Using Cutting Edge Technologies.

Authors:  Brian M Schmidt
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-02-12

Review 5.  Osteomyelitis or Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy? Differentiating these disorders in diabetic patients with a foot problem.

Authors:  Bulent M Ertugrul; Benjamin A Lipsky; Oner Savk
Journal:  Diabet Foot Ankle       Date:  2013-11-05

6.  Scintigraphic Evaluation of the Stump Region After Extremity Amputation and the Effect of Scintigraphy on Treatment.

Authors:  Murat Sadic; Hasan Ikbal Atilgan; Aylin Baskin; Alev Cinar; Gokhan Koca; Koray Demirel; Aylin Comak; Sinem Ozyurt; Sule Yildirim; Meliha Korkmaz
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2016-01-26

7.  Impact of diagnostic bone biopsies on the management of non-vertebral osteomyelitis: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Cole B Hirschfeld; Shashi N Kapadia; Joanna Bryan; Deanna P Jannat-Khah; Benjamin May; Ole Vielemeyer; Ernie L Esquivel
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Microbiological Concordance in the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Infections with Osteomyelitis, on the Basis of Cultures of Different Specimens at a Diabetic Foot Center in China.

Authors:  Xuemei Li; Qingfeng Cheng; Zhipeng Du; Shenyin Zhu; Chao Cheng
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.168

9.  Intralesional epidermal growth factor for diabetic foot wounds: the first cases in Turkey.

Authors:  Bulent M Ertugrul; Cagri Buke; Ozlem Saylak Ersoy; Bengisu Ay; Dilek Senen Demirez; Oner Savk
Journal:  Diabet Foot Ankle       Date:  2015-08-11

Review 10.  Inpatient management of diabetic foot disorders: a clinical guide.

Authors:  Dane K Wukich; David G Armstrong; Christopher E Attinger; Andrew J M Boulton; Patrick R Burns; Robert G Frykberg; Richard Hellman; Paul J Kim; Benjamin A Lipsky; James C Pile; Michael S Pinzur; Linda Siminerio
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 19.112

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.