Literature DB >> 18684284

Steerable sheath catheter navigation for ablation of atrial fibrillation: a case-control study.

Christopher Piorkowski1, Hans Kottkamp, Jin-Hong Gerds-Li, Arash Arya, Philipp Sommer, Nicos Dagres, Masahiro Esato, Sam Riahi, Sebastian Weiss, Simon Kircher, Gerhard Hindricks.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lack of stable access to all desired ablation target sites is one of the limitations for efficacious circumferential left atrial (LA) pulmonary vein (PV) ablation. Targeting that, new catheter navigation technologies have been developed. The aim of this study was to describe atrial fibrillation (AF) mapping and ablation using manually controlled steerable sheath catheter navigation and to compare it against an ablation approach with a nonsteerable sheath. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In this case-control-analysis 245 consecutive patients (controls) treated with circumferential left atrial PV ablation were matched with 105 subsequently consecutive patients (cases) ablated with a similar line concept but mapping and ablation performed with a manually controlled steerable sheath. One hundred sixty-six patients were selected to be included into 83 matched patient pairs. Ablation success was measured with serial 7-day Holter electrocardiograms. Patients ablated with the steerable sheath showed an increase in the success rate (freedom from AF) from 56% to 77% (P = 0.009) after a single procedure and 6 months of follow-up. With respect to procedural data no difference could be found for procedure time, fluoroscopy time, irradiation dose, and radiofrequency (RF) burning time. With the steerable sheath mean procedural RF power (33 +/- 9 vs 41 +/- 4 W; P < 0.0005) and total RF energy delivery (97,498 vs 111,864 J; P < 0.005) were significantly lower and the rate of complete PV isolation significantly increased from 10% to 52% (P < 0.0005). The complication rate was the same in both groups. Among different arrhythmia, procedure, and patient characteristics, the lack of early postinterventional arrhythmia recurrences was the only but powerful predictor for long-term ablation success.
CONCLUSIONS: An AF mapping and ablation approach solely using a manually controlled steerable sheath for catheter navigation improved the outcome of circumferential left atrial PV ablation at similar intervention times and similar complication rates. The 6-month success rate after a single LA intervention increased from 56% to 77%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18684284     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01101.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  10 in total

1.  Measuring luminal esophageal temperature during pulmonary vein isolation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Daisuke Sato; Kunihiro Teramoto; Hiroki Kitajima; Naoto Nishina; Yoshitomi Kida; Hiroki Mani; Masahiro Esato; Yeong-Hwa Chun; Toshiji Iwasaka
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-26

2.  Clinical experience with routine use of a single combined mapping and ablation catheter for isolation of pulmonary veins in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Clemens Steinwender; Simon Hönig; Franz Leisch; Robert Hofmann
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  14th Annual Boston Atrial Fibrillation Symposium Proceedings - Technology Round Up.

Authors:  Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy Md Facc
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2009-02-01

4.  Electrogram characteristics of the coronary sinus in cases requiring epicardial ablation within the coronary sinus for creating a conduction block at the left lateral mitral isthmus.

Authors:  Daisuke Sato; Hiroki Mani; Yu Makihara; Hiroki Kitajima; Yuji Nishikawa; Seno Keitaro; Yeong-Hwa Chun
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Accurate guidance of a catheter by ultrasound imaging and identification of a catheter tip by pulsed-wave Doppler.

Authors:  Eileen M McMahon; Panupong Jiamsripong; Minako Katayama; Hari P Chaliki; Mostafa Fatemi; Marek Belohlavek
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Topographic variability of the left atrium and pulmonary veins assessed by 3D-CT predicts the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation.

Authors:  Kunihiko Kiuchi; Akihiro Yoshida; Asumi Takei; Koji Fukuzawa; Mitsuaki Itoh; Kimitake Imamura; Ryudo Fujiwara; Atsushi Suzuki; Tomoyuki Nakanishi; Soichiro Yamashita; Ken-Ichi Hirata; Gaku Kanda; Katsunori Okajima; Akira Shimane; Shinichiro Yamada; Yasuyo Taniguchi; Yoshinori Yasaka; Hiroya Kawai
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2015-04-25

7.  Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation with Ventricular Pacing Results in Similar Spatial Catheter Stability as Compared to Ablation in Sinus Rhythm with Atrial Pacing.

Authors:  Matthew Dai; Chirag Barbhaiya; Anthony Aizer; Jonathan Hyde; Edward Kogan; Douglas Holmes; Scott Bernstein; Michael Spinelli; David S Park; Larry A Chinitz; Lior Jankelson
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2020-10-31

8.  A review of mitral isthmus ablation.

Authors:  Kelvin Ck Wong; Timothy R Betts
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2012-07-28

9.  Steerable versus nonsteerable sheath technology in atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed Mhanna; Azizullah Beran; Ahmad Al-Abdouh; Omar Sajdeya; Mahmoud Barbarawi; Mahmoud Alsaiqali; Ahmad Jabri; Ahmad Al-Aaraj; Abdulmajeed Alharbi; Paul Chacko
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2022-06-03

Review 10.  Current hot potatoes in atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  Laurent Roten; Nicolas Derval; Patrizio Pascale; Daniel Scherr; Yuki Komatsu; Ashok Shah; Khaled Ramoul; Arnaud Denis; Frédéric Sacher; Mélèze Hocini; Michel Haïssaguerre; Pierre Jaïs
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2012-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.