Howard P Greenwald1, Ruth McCorkle. 1. School of Policy, Planning, and Development, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0626, USA. greenwa@usc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The study reported here assesses sexuality and sexual functioning among women treated for invasive cervical cancer over broad portions of the life cycle. Hysterectomy and oophorectomy, two widespread interventions in invasive cervical cancer, have potentially important effects on a woman's self-image and sexuality. METHODS: The investigation focused on women aged 29-69 with histories of invasive cervical cancer (n = 179) from the Connecticut Tumor Registry, 6-29 years postdiagnosis. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relative impact of time since cervical cancer diagnosis and treatment received, adjusting for age and social and economic background. Sexuality, sexual function, and potential correlates were assessed using the Sexual Adjustment Scale, the MOS-36, and the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D). RESULTS: Strong majorities of women in the study indicated that they were sexually active (81.1%) and both desired (81.4%) and enjoyed (90.9%) sexual activity. Neither time since cervical cancer diagnosis nor age significantly affected sexuality or sexual function. Women with hysterectomies (with or without oophorectomy) less often reported lack of interest in (odds ratio [OR] 0.36, p < 0.05) and lack of desire for (OR 0.26, p < 0.05) sexual activity than women who had not had hysterectomies. Among women with hysterectomies, those with oophorectomies had a greater risk (OR 21.1, p < 0.05) of not enjoying sex but did not differ otherwise from those without oophorectomies. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that cervical cancer survivors generally have a positive attitude toward sexuality and engage in satisfying sexual activity.
OBJECTIVES: The study reported here assesses sexuality and sexual functioning among women treated for invasive cervical cancer over broad portions of the life cycle. Hysterectomy and oophorectomy, two widespread interventions in invasive cervical cancer, have potentially important effects on a woman's self-image and sexuality. METHODS: The investigation focused on women aged 29-69 with histories of invasive cervical cancer (n = 179) from the Connecticut Tumor Registry, 6-29 years postdiagnosis. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relative impact of time since cervical cancer diagnosis and treatment received, adjusting for age and social and economic background. Sexuality, sexual function, and potential correlates were assessed using the Sexual Adjustment Scale, the MOS-36, and the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D). RESULTS: Strong majorities of women in the study indicated that they were sexually active (81.1%) and both desired (81.4%) and enjoyed (90.9%) sexual activity. Neither time since cervical cancer diagnosis nor age significantly affected sexuality or sexual function. Women with hysterectomies (with or without oophorectomy) less often reported lack of interest in (odds ratio [OR] 0.36, p < 0.05) and lack of desire for (OR 0.26, p < 0.05) sexual activity than women who had not had hysterectomies. Among women with hysterectomies, those with oophorectomies had a greater risk (OR 21.1, p < 0.05) of not enjoying sex but did not differ otherwise from those without oophorectomies. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that cervical cancer survivors generally have a positive attitude toward sexuality and engage in satisfying sexual activity.
Authors: J L Shifren; G D Braunstein; J A Simon; P R Casson; J E Buster; G P Redmond; R E Burki; E S Ginsburg; R C Rosen; S R Leiblum; K E Caramelli; N A Mazer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-09-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mark Robson; Martee Hensley; Richard Barakat; Carol Brown; Dennis Chi; Elizabeth Poynor; Kenneth Offit Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Diana D Jeffery; Lisa Barbera; Barbara L Andersen; Amy K Siston; Anuja Jhingran; Shirley R Baron; Jennifer Barsky Reese; Deborah J Coady; Jeanne Carter; Kathryn E Flynn Journal: J Psychosoc Oncol Date: 2015
Authors: Jeanne Carter; Helen Huang; Dana M Chase; Joan L Walker; David Cella; Lari Wenzel Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Daan Brandenbarg; Saskia W M C Maass; Olaf P Geerse; Mariken E Stegmann; Charlotte Handberg; Maya J Schroevers; Saskia F A Duijts Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Date: 2019-05-14 Impact factor: 2.328
Authors: Christina M Wilson; Deborah B McGuire; Beth L Rodgers; R K Elswick; Sarah M Temkin Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2021 Sep-Oct 01 Impact factor: 2.592