Literature DB >> 18677990

An assessment of fecal indicator bacteria-based water quality standards.

Andrew D Gronewold1, Mark E Borsuk, Robert L Wolpert, Kenneth H Reckhow.   

Abstract

Fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) are commonly used to assess the threat of pathogen contamination in coastal and inland waters. Unlike most measures of pollutant levels however, FIB concentration metrics, such as most probable number (MPN) and colony-forming units (CFU), are not direct measures of the true in situ concentration distribution. Therefore, there is the potential for inconsistencies among model and sample-based water quality assessments, such as those used in the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program. To address this problem, we present an innovative approach to assessing pathogen contamination based on water quality standards that impose limits on parameters of the actual underlying FIB concentration distribution, rather than on MPN or CFU values. Such concentration-based standards link more explicitly to human health considerations, are independent of the analytical procedures employed, and are consistent with the outcomes of most predictive water quality models. We demonstrate how compliance with concentration-based standards can be inferred from traditional MPN values using a Bayesian inference procedure. This methodology, applicable to a wide range of FIB-based water quality assessments, is illustrated here using fecal coliform data from shellfish harvesting waters in the Newport River Estuary, North Carolina. Results indicate that areas determined to be compliant according to the current methods-based standards may actually have an unacceptably high probability of being in violation of concentration-based standards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18677990     DOI: 10.1021/es703144k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  Estimating virus occurrence using Bayesian modeling in multiple drinking water systems of the United States.

Authors:  Eunice A Varughese; Nichole E Brinkman; Emily M Anneken; Jennifer L Cashdollar; G Shay Fout; Edward T Furlong; Dana W Kolpin; Susan T Glassmeyer; Scott P Keely
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Elucidating Waterborne Pathogen Presence and Aiding Source Apportionment in an Impaired Stream.

Authors:  Jennifer Weidhaas; Angela Anderson; Rubayat Jamal
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Ecology of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus in the coastal and estuarine waters of Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, and Washington (United States).

Authors:  Crystal N Johnson; John C Bowers; Kimberly J Griffitt; Vanessa Molina; Rachel W Clostio; Shaofeng Pei; Edward Laws; Rohinee N Paranjpye; Mark S Strom; Arlene Chen; Nur A Hasan; Anwar Huq; Nicholas F Noriea; D Jay Grimes; Rita R Colwell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Design and rationale of a matched cohort study to assess the effectiveness of a combined household-level piped water and sanitation intervention in rural Odisha, India.

Authors:  Heather Reese; Parimita Routray; Belen Torondel; Gloria Sclar; Maryann G Delea; Sheela S Sinharoy; Laura Zambrano; Bethany Caruso; Samir R Mishra; Howard H Chang; Thomas Clasen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Learning Something From Nothing: The Critical Importance of Rethinking Microbial Non-detects.

Authors:  Alex Ho Shing Chik; Philip J Schmidt; Monica B Emelko
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Maxent estimation of aquatic Escherichia coli stream impairment.

Authors:  Dennis Gilfillan; Timothy A Joyner; Phillip Scheuerman
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.