Literature DB >> 18677882

The effectiveness of tailored feedback and action plans in an intervention addressing multiple health behaviors.

H de Vries1, S P J Kremers, T Smeets, J Brug, K Eijmael.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Examine the effects of three iterative tailored feedback letters addressing smoking; physical activity; and fruit, vegetable, and fat intake, and test the additional effects of providing feedback on action plans.
DESIGN: A tailored, print-based intervention was developed and tested in a randomized control trial with a posttest after 9 months.
SETTING: A total of 2827 respondents agreed to participate. They were recruited from a random sample of 35,000 addresses obtained through the Dutch national telephone company.
SUBJECTS: The mean age was 49 years, and 55% were female. Intervention. The experimental group received three printed tailored letters, and the control group received three printed generic letters. Respondents from the experimental group randomly received either a third letter with tailored information or tailored information and action-planning feedback. MEASURES; The questionnaire assessed physical activity; smoking; consumption of fruit, vegetables and fat; motivational determinants; action plans; and demographics.
RESULTS: Tailored information resulted in more improvement over time than generic information for the intake of fruit, vegetables, and fat and for physical activity. No differences between the conditions were found for smoking because of high cessation rates in all conditions. Action-planning feedback did not increase the effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Tailored lifestyle information can be effective for adults in changing nutrition behavior and physical activity.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18677882     DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.22.6.417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Promot        ISSN: 0890-1171


  87 in total

1.  When it comes to lifestyle recommendations, more is sometimes less: a meta-analysis of theoretical assumptions underlying the effectiveness of interventions promoting multiple behavior domain change.

Authors:  Kristina Wilson; Ibrahim Senay; Marta Durantini; Flor Sánchez; Michael Hennessy; Bonnie Spring; Dolores Albarracín
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  A Review of Multiple Health Behavior Change Interventions for Primary Prevention.

Authors:  Judith J Prochaska; James O Prochaska
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2011-05

3.  Long-term dietary outcomes of the FRESH START intervention for breast and prostate cancer survivors.

Authors:  Shannon M Christy; Catherine E Mosher; Richard Sloane; Denise C Snyder; David F Lobach; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2011-12

4.  Differences in Sociocognitive Beliefs between Involved and Noninvolved Employees during the Implementation of an Electronic Health Record System.

Authors:  Nicola Esther Stanczyk; Rik Crutzen; Nikki Sewuster; Elwin Schotanus; Merijn Mulders; Henricus Paul Cremers
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2017-04-01

5.  Promoting colorectal cancer screening discussion: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Shannon M Christy; Susan M Perkins; Yan Tong; Connie Krier; Victoria L Champion; Celette Sugg Skinner; Jeffrey K Springston; Thomas F Imperiale; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 6.  Improving physical activity and dietary behaviours with single or multiple health behaviour interventions? A synthesis of meta-analyses and reviews.

Authors:  Shane N Sweet; Michelle S Fortier
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Utilization patterns and user characteristics of an ad libitum Internet weight loss program.

Authors:  Martin Binks; Trevor van Mierlo
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Design of the Balance@Work project: systematic development, evaluation and implementation of an occupational health guideline aimed at the prevention of weight gain among employees.

Authors:  Lisanne M Verweij; Karin I Proper; Andre N H Weel; Carel T J Hulshof; Willem van Mechelen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Action planning as predictor of health protective and health risk behavior: an investigation of fruit and snack consumption.

Authors:  Liesbeth van Osch; Mariëlle Beenackers; Astrid Reubsaet; Lilian Lechner; Math Candel; Hein de Vries
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  Assessing a risk tailored intervention to prevent disabling low back pain--protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Jean-François Chenot; Michael Pfingsten; Ruth Anja Fahland; Gabriele Lindena; Ulf Marnitz; Klaus Pfeifer; Thomas Kohlmann
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.