Literature DB >> 18677671

Body schema and body awareness of amputees.

A Mayer1, K Kudar, K Bretz, J Tihanyi.   

Abstract

AIM: The phantom phenomenon is a well-known example of the difference between body awareness and body schema. The present study is aimed at showing how body changes and prosthesis use are reflected in body schema and body awareness-the latter relating to the image that various amputees have of their bodies. SUBJECT AND METHODS: (i) Examining the configuration of body schema: A trial examining the spatial location of the phantom limb (50 people with lower or upper limb loss); (ii) examining the functional aspect of body schema: The distribution of weight power between intact and prosthetic limbs (34 people with tibial amputation); (iii) examining body awareness: Body Focus Questionnaire by Fisher (44 people with lower limb amputation, 33 intact people); and (iv) Questionnaire on anamnesis- and prosthesis-wearing habits (people participating in research methods [i] and [iii] mentioned above).
RESULTS: We found that when the amputees wore their prostheses, the configuration of body schema did not change, however, the people who had not used their prosthesis for a long period of time (in our study, at least for six years), the phantom limb shortened, a phenomenon known as telescoping. The functional adaptation of the prosthesis to the body schema starts in a short time (within two weeks) after wearing it, and it becomes close to normal in carrying body weight after a longer period of time (two years). In the beginning phase of rehabilitation, the awareness of legs is similar to that of the control group, while later on it this awareness decreases. Over time, however, the lost limb, regardless of having a prosthesis or not, loses its importance. People with a more serious or vascular amputation of the upper limbs have a clearer image of them. Limb parts having a greater cortical representation appear more intensively in phantom sensations, while the strength of the cortical representation in body schema has no significance.
CONCLUSION: From both configuration and functional aspects, wearing a prosthesis helps maintain a body schema in which the phantom limb remains similar to the intact one, which can be explained by the connectional schema model. This is needed for movements to be carried out properly. Although the amputee can see the prosthesis and senses the phantom limb, they do not consider it their own since they are aware of the loss. Therefore, the fact that a prosthesis is worn will not be represented in body awareness as the highest level of mental structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18677671     DOI: 10.1080/03093640802024971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int        ISSN: 0309-3646            Impact factor:   1.895


  10 in total

Review 1.  The body in the brain revisited.

Authors:  Giovanni Berlucchi; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Bimanual comfort depends on how extreme either hand's posture is, not on which hand is in the more extreme posture.

Authors:  Kate M Chapman; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-09-26

3.  Imagining is Not Doing but Involves Specific Motor Commands: A Review of Experimental Data Related to Motor Inhibition.

Authors:  Aymeric Guillot; Franck Di Rienzo; Tadhg Macintyre; Aidan Moran; Christian Collet
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Walking with Neuropathic Pain: Paradoxical Shift from Burden to Support?

Authors:  David J Kopsky; Jan M Keppel Hesselink; Roberto Casale
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2015-07-28

5.  Elective amputation and bionic substitution restore functional hand use after critical soft tissue injuries.

Authors:  Oskar C Aszmann; Ivan Vujaklija; Aidan D Roche; Stefan Salminger; Malvina Herceg; Agnes Sturma; Laura A Hruby; Anna Pittermann; Christian Hofer; Sebastian Amsuess; Dario Farina
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Body image and self-esteem in lower-limb amputees.

Authors:  Lukas A Holzer; Florian Sevelda; Georg Fraberger; Olivia Bluder; Wolfgang Kickinger; Gerold Holzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Development of Embodied Sense of Self Scale (ESSS): Exploring Everyday Experiences Induced by Anomalous Self-Representation.

Authors:  Tomohisa Asai; Noriaki Kanayama; Shu Imaizumi; Shinichi Koyama; Seiji Kaganoi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-07-05

8.  Creative Practices Embodied, Embedded, and Enacted in Architectural Settings: Toward an Ecological Model of Creativity.

Authors:  Laura H Malinin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-06

9.  Phantom limb perception interferes with motor imagery after unilateral upper-limb amputation.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Lyu; Xiaoli Guo; Robin Bekrater-Bodmann; Herta Flor; Shanbao Tong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Body Schema Self-Awareness and Related Dream Content Modifications in Amputees Due to Cancer.

Authors:  Alessandra Giordano; Michele Boffano; Raimondo Piana; Roberto Mutani; Alessandro Cicolin
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-12-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.