Literature DB >> 18677610

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: analysis of the effect of various concentrations of contrast material.

Yoshihiko Fukukura1, Hiroyuki Hamada, Takuro Kamiyama, Tomohide Yoneyama, Koji Takumi, Masayuki Nakajo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of two contrast materials with moderate and high iodine concentrations for the depiction of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A series of 107 patients with histologically proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma underwent helical computed tomography. A fixed dose of 100 ml of iopamidol 300 (mg I/ml) was administered to 50 patients (group A) and iopamidol 370 (mg I/ml) to 57 patients (group B) at the same injection rate (3 ml/s). Unenhanced helical scans and contrast-enhanced scans for three phases (30, 70, and 300 s after starting the infusion of contrast material) were obtained. We evaluated enhancement of the aorta, portal vein, hepatic parenchyma, pancreatic parenchyma, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma during each phase.
RESULTS: During all phases, both aortic and pancreatic enhancement were significantly greater in group B than in group A (P<0.01). Enhancement of the portal vein and hepatic parenchyma was significantly greater at 70 and 300 s in group B than in group A (both P<0.01). Tumor-to-pancreas contrast was significantly greater in group B than in group A at both 30 s (P<0.01) and 70 s (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Administration of contrast material with a high iodine concentration is more effective for depicting pancreatic adenocarcinomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18677610     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-008-0240-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Med        ISSN: 0288-2043


  27 in total

1.  Assessment of pancreatic CT enhancement using a high concentration of contrast material.

Authors:  Masaharu Shinagawa; Masafumi Uchida; Masatoshi Ishibashi; Hiroshi Nishimura; Naofumi Hayabuchi
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

Review 2.  IV contrast selection for MDCT: current thoughts and practice.

Authors:  Pamela T Johnson; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT.

Authors:  M E Tublin; F N Tessler; S L Cheng; T L Peters; P C McGovern
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Hepatic helical CT: effect of reduction of iodine dose of intravenous contrast material on hepatic contrast enhancement.

Authors:  P C Freeny; J C Gardner; G vonIngersleben; S Heyano; H V Nghiem; T C Winter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Three-dimensional models of the abdominal vasculature based on helical CT: usefulness in patients with pancreatic neoplasms.

Authors:  R K Zeman; W J Davros; P Berman; D I Weltman; P M Silverman; C Cooper; S R Evans; R R Buras; T J Stahl; R J Nauta
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Local extension of pancreatic carcinoma: assessment with thin-section helical CT versus with breath-hold fast MR imaging--ROC analysis.

Authors:  T Nishiharu; Y Yamashita; Y Abe; K Mitsuzaki; T Tsuchigame; Y Nakayama; M Takahashi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: designing the examination to evaluate the clinical questions.

Authors:  A J Megibow
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Simulation of aortic peak enhancement on MDCT using a contrast material flow phantom: feasibility study.

Authors:  Kazuo Awai; Atsushi Hatcho; Yoshiharu Nakayama; Shinichiro Kusunoki; Duo Liu; Masahiro Hatemura; Yoshinori Funama; Masayuki Denbo; Natsuko Sato; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Pancreatic malignancy: value of arterial, pancreatic, and hepatic phase imaging with multi-detector row CT.

Authors:  Joel G Fletcher; Maurits J Wiersema; Michael A Farrell; Jeff L Fidler; Lawrence J Burgart; Takashi Koyama; C Daniel Johnson; David H Stephens; Ellen M Ward; W Scott Harmsen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Slip-ring and conventional dynamic hepatic CT: contrast material and timing considerations.

Authors:  L L Berland
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.