Literature DB >> 18677164

Evaluation of a recalibrated Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation cardiovascular risk chart: results from Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation Germany.

Hans-Werner Hense1, Eva Koesters, Jürgen Wellmann, Christa Meisinger, Henry Völzke, Ulrich Keil.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A recalibrated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk chart for the German population, Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) Germany, was developed in 2005. We evaluated the risk prediction by SCORE Germany in two large population-based surveys. STUDY POPULATIONS AND METHODS: We applied the SCORE Germany risk function to men and women, aged 40-65 years, who participated in surveys of the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP), north-east Germany or the Cooperative Health Research in the Augsburg Region (KORA) study (southern Germany). The prevalence of single risk factor combinations and of the SCORE Germany risk prediction categories was assessed. The 10-year risk of fatal CVD predicted by SCORE Germany (P) was evaluated against the risk observed in the general population using official mortality data (O).
RESULTS: Less than one in 25 women in the two studies had a high-predicted 10-year risk of fatal CVD (> or =5%), whereas one in three men in SHIP and about one in four men in KORA belonged to this risk group. The age-specific predicted risk of fatal CVD was consistently higher for men and women from SHIP than from KORA. On comparison, the P/O ratio of 10-year CVD risks was close to unity and tended to decline with higher age in the both studies.
CONCLUSION: Overestimations of risks with the original SCORE model are reduced mostly with SCORE Germany. Differences in risk factors and CVD risk between populations within Germany are reflected properly by risk predictions with SCORE Germany. The recalibrated risk chart seems to be suited for use in German clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18677164     DOI: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3282feec66

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil        ISSN: 1741-8267


  6 in total

Review 1.  Improving risk factor modification: a global approach.

Authors:  Tshaka Muchiteni; William B Borden
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Assessment of cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Marie Therese Cooney; Helen C Cooney; Alexandra Dudina; Ian M Graham
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  The Management of Non-Dialysis-Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease in Primary Care.

Authors:  Gesine Weckmann; Jean-François Chenot; Sylvia Stracke
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Effect of using cardiovascular risk scoring in routine risk assessment in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: protocol for an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Krzysztof Studziński; Tomasz Tomasik; Janusz Krzyszton; Jacek Jóźwiak; Adam Windak
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Prevalence dependent calibration of a predictive model for nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Johannes Elias; Peter U Heuschmann; Corinna Schmitt; Frithjof Eckhardt; Hartmut Boehm; Sebastian Maier; Annette Kolb-Mäurer; Hubertus Riedmiller; Wolfgang Müllges; Christoph Weisser; Christian Wunder; Matthias Frosch; Ulrich Vogel
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.090

6.  Re-calibration of coronary risk prediction: an example of the Seven Countries Study.

Authors:  Paolo Emilio Puddu; Paolo Piras; Daan Kromhout; Hanna Tolonen; Anthony Kafatos; Alessandro Menotti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.