Literature DB >> 18676803

Esthetic orthodontic treatment using the invisalign appliance for moderate to complex malocclusions.

Robert L Boyd1.   

Abstract

In this report, three patients were treated with a new treatment protocol for Invisalign to demonstrate that a variety of complex malocclusions can be successfully treated using this protocol, including correction of moderate crowding, correction of moderate Class II division 1, and deep overbite. Previous studies of Invisalign showed significant limitations for more complex orthodontic treatment, although a few recent case reports have shown successfully completed moderate to difficult orthodontic malocclusions. One reason for the discrepancy is that the earlier studies were done during the first four years of the appliance development (now ten years of clinical use), when significant problems existed with accomplishing bodily movement, torquing of roots, extrusions, and rotations of premolars and canines. The new protocol included new methods for anterior/posterior corrections, showing on the computer the effect of elastics for Class II treatment simulated as a one-stage anterior/posterior movement at the end of treatment. Staging for interproximal reduction (IPR) is now automatically staged when there is better access to interproximal contacts to avoid IPR where significant overlap between teeth is present to avoid performing IPR on surfaces that may be damaged by instruments such as burs, strips, and disks when cut on a sharp angle. Staging for tooth movements is now also done to enable combination movements to occur simultaneously for each tooth with the tooth that needs to move the most (the lead tooth) determining the minimum number of stages required. All other teeth move at a slower rate than the lead tooth throughout the duration of treatment. Attachments are now placed in the middle of the crown automatically for rotation and automatically sized in proportion to the clinical crown. Use of 1 mm thick (buccal-lingual dimension) horizontal beveled rectangular attachments is standard on premolars for retention of aligners during intrusive movements, such as leveling the lower curve of Spee in deep overbite for extrusions and for control of the tooth long axis during torquing movements. Staging of tooth movements now track linear and rotational velocities of teeth separately with the number of treatment stages determined by the lead tooth based on its rotational or linear maximum velocities at no more than two degrees of rotation per stage. Simultaneous movements are done for all teeth providing visible space (approximately 0.05 mm) between teeth during movements past other teeth using expansion instead of IPR as a primary way to increase space available for correction of crowding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18676803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Educ        ISSN: 0022-0337            Impact factor:   2.264


  21 in total

1.  Self-ligating versus Invisalign: analysis of dento-alveolar effects.

Authors:  Chiara Pavoni; Roberta Lione; Giuseppina Laganà; Paola Cozza
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2011-07-18

2.  Invisalign® treatment in the anterior region: were the predicted tooth movements achieved?

Authors:  Elena Krieger; Jörg Seiferth; Ivana Marinello; Britta A Jung; Susanne Wriedt; Collin Jacobs; Heinrich Wehrbein
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Accuracy of Invisalign® treatments in the anterior tooth region. First results.

Authors:  Elena Krieger; Jörg Seiferth; Ivana Saric; Britta A Jung; Heinrich Wehrbein
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Efficiency of upper arch expansion with the Invisalign system.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Jing Guo
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Effects of Invisalign (G5) with virtual bite ramps for skeletal deep overbite malocclusion correction in adults.

Authors:  Douglas Henick; Willy Dayan; Robert Dunford; Stephen Warunek; Thikriat Al-Jewair
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Outcome assessment of orthodontic clear aligner vs fixed appliance treatment in a teenage population with mild malocclusions.

Authors:  Alissa F Borda; Judah S Garfinkle; David A Covell; Mansen Wang; Larry Doyle; Christine M Sedgley
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Orthofile®: a new approach for mechanical interproximal reduction : a scanning electron microscopic enamel evaluation.

Authors:  L Lombardo; M P Guarneri; P D'Amico; C Molinari; V Meddis; A Carlucci; G Siciliani
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  The influence of occlusal forces on force delivery properties of aligners during rotation of an upper central incisor.

Authors:  Wolfram Hahn; Benjamin Engelke; Klaus Jung; Henning Dathe; Franz-Joseph Kramer; Tina Rödig; Dietmar Kubein-Meesenburg; Rudolf M Gruber
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  A comparative study of two different clear aligner systems.

Authors:  Federica Ercoli; Michele Tepedino; Vincenzo Parziale; Cesare Luzi
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 2.750

10.  Initial forces and moments delivered by removable thermoplastic appliances during rotation of an upper central incisor.

Authors:  Wolfram Hahn; Benjamin Engelke; Klaus Jung; Henning Dathe; Julia Fialka-Fricke; Dietmar Kubein-Meesenburg; Reza Sadat-Khonsari
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.