Literature DB >> 1867561

Comparative efficacies of soft contact lens disinfectant solutions against microbial films in lens cases.

L A Wilson1, A D Sawant, D G Ahearn.   

Abstract

Biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Candida albicans, established in the wells of a polyethylene contact lens case, retained viability to certain soft contact lens disinfectant solutions after exposure for the manufacturer's minimum recommended disinfection times. The relative order of resistance of bacterial biofilms was as follows: S marcescens was greater than P aeruginosa, which was greater than S epidermidis, which was greater than S pyogenes. Air drying of biofilms for 10 hours increased the efficacy of the disinfectant solutions, but drying was not enough to decrease the incidence of recovery to 0% for all solutions. Hydrogen peroxide was more effective against biofilms than disinfectant solutions formulated with chlorhexidine gluconate or polyquaternium-1 or polyaminopropyl biguanide. We recommend that determination of efficacy of contact lens disinfectant solutions should include challenges against biofilms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1867561     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1991.01080080115043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  17 in total

1.  Spatial and temporal patterns of biocide action against Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms.

Authors:  William M Davison; Betsey Pitts; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Non-compliance with contact lens wear and care practices: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Danielle M Robertson; H Dwight Cavanagh
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 3.  Plasticity of Candida albicans Biofilms.

Authors:  David R Soll; Karla J Daniels
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 11.056

4.  Pseudomonas keratitis associated with biofilm formation on a disposable soft contact lens.

Authors:  F Stapleton; J Dart
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  The impact of cellular debris on Pseudomonas aeruginosa adherence to silicone hydrogel contact lenses and contact lens storage cases.

Authors:  Geoffrey W Burnham; H Dwight Cavanagh; Danielle M Robertson
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.018

6.  Fusarium and Candida albicans biofilms on soft contact lenses: model development, influence of lens type, and susceptibility to lens care solutions.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Imamura; Jyotsna Chandra; Pranab K Mukherjee; Ali Abdul Lattif; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Eric Pearlman; Jonathan H Lass; Kerry O'Donnell; Mahmoud A Ghannoum
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Current perspectives on ophthalmic mycoses.

Authors:  Philip A Thomas
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Human Tear Fluid Reduces Culturability of Contact Lens-Associated Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms but Induces Expression of the Virulence-Associated Type III Secretion System.

Authors:  Yvonne T Wu; Connie Tam; Lucia S Zhu; David J Evans; Suzanne M J Fleiszig
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  Adaptation and growth of Serratia marcescens in contact lens disinfectant solutions containing chlorhexidine gluconate.

Authors:  P A Gandhi; A D Sawant; L A Wilson; D G Ahearn
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Increased resistance of contact lens-related bacterial biofilms to antimicrobial activity of soft contact lens care solutions.

Authors:  Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Yoshifumi Imamura; Jyotsna Chandra; Changping Yu; Pranab K Mukherjee; Eric Pearlman; Mahmoud A Ghannoum
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.651

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.