Literature DB >> 18674724

Acute chest pain imaging in the emergency department with cardiac computed tomography angiography.

Ricardo C Cury1, Gudrun Feutchner, Constantino S Pena, Warren R Janowitz, Barry T Katzen, Jack A Ziffer.   

Abstract

In practice, the determination of ischemic chest pain in the emergency department (ED) population is difficult and errors are common. Cardiac computed tomography angiography has recently emerged for accurate noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease, and it may offer a promising new approach to improve the triage of patients presenting to the ED with acute chest pain, in particular in terms of a faster and accurate way to determine the diagnosis, which could effectively reduce hospital admissions and costs. The focus of this article is to review the current literature on the use of cardiac computed tomography angiography in the ED setting by providing pooled sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the published literature to date. Moreover, different protocols for detection of patients with cardiac and other, noncardiac causes of chest pain (triple rule-out protocol) are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18674724     DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2008.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  66 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain.

Authors:  T H Lee; L Goldman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion and viability from routine contrast-enhanced 16-detector-row computed tomography of the heart: preliminary results.

Authors:  Konstantin Nikolaou; Javier Sanz; Michael Poon; Bernd J Wintersperger; Bernd Ohnesorge; Teresa Rius; Zahi A Fayad; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Subha V Raman; Mona Shah; Beth McCarthy; Anne Garcia; Amy K Ferketich
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  64 slice cardiovascular CT in the emergency department: concepts and first experiences.

Authors:  G Savino; C Herzog; P Costello; U J Schoepf
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2006-05-29       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  ECG-gated 64-MDCT angiography in the differential diagnosis of acute chest pain.

Authors:  Thorsten R C Johnson; Konstantin Nikolaou; Bernd J Wintersperger; Andreas Knez; Peter Boekstegers; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose.

Authors:  James P Earls; Elise L Berman; Bruce A Urban; Charlene A Curry; Judith L Lane; Robert S Jennings; Colin C McCulloch; Jiang Hsieh; John H Londt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Outcome at 1 year after an invasive compared with a non-invasive strategy in unstable coronary-artery disease: the FRISC II invasive randomised trial. FRISC II Investigators. Fast Revascularisation during Instability in Coronary artery disease.

Authors:  L Wallentin; B Lagerqvist; S Husted; F Kontny; E Ståhle; E Swahn
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Clinical Features of Emergency Department Patients Presenting with Symptoms Suggestive of Acute Cardiac Ischemia: A Multicenter Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 9.  Cardiac CT in emergency department patients with acute chest pain.

Authors:  Udo Hoffmann; Antonio J Pena; Ricardo C Cury; Suhny Abbara; Maros Ferencik; Fabian Moselewski; Uwe Siebert; Thomas J Brady; John T Nagurney
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

10.  Right heart: split-bolus injection of diluted contrast medium for visualization at coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  J Matthias Kerl; James G Ravenel; Shaun A Nguyen; Pal Suranyi; Christian Thilo; Philip Costello; Werner Bautz; U Joseph Schoepf
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  4 in total

1.  Efficacy of multi-detector coronary computed tomography angiography in comparison with exercise electrocardiogram in the triage of patients of low risk acute chest pain.

Authors:  M Nagori; V S Narain; R K Saran; S K Dwivedi; R Sethi
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2014-07-03

Review 2.  Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) in community hospitals: "current and emerging role".

Authors:  Rakesh K Sharma; Donald J Voelker; Rajiv K Sharma; Vibhuti N Singh; Girish Bhatt; Mathilde Moazazi; Teresa Nash; Hanumanth K Reddy
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-05-25

3.  Myocardial deformation by strain echocardiography identifies patients with acute coronary syndrome and non-diagnostic ECG presenting in a chest pain unit: a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Joerg Schroeder; Sandra Hamada; Nina Gründlinger; Tanja Rubeau; Ertunc Altiok; Katrin Ulbrich; Andras Keszei; Nikolaus Marx; Michael Becker
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Tomography Angiography and Serial Measurements of Sensitive Cardiac Troponin in Patients With Chest Pain and Intermediate Risk for Cardiovascular Events.

Authors:  Alexandre de Matos Soeiro; Bruno Biselli; Tatiana C A T Leal; Aline Siqueira Bossa; Maria Cristina César; Sérgio Jallad; Priscila Gherardi Goldstein; Patrícia Oliveira Guimarães; Carlos Vicente Serrano; Cesar Higa Nomura; Débora Nakamura; Carlos Eduardo Rochitte; Paulo Rogério Soares; Múcio Tavares de Oliveira
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.667

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.