Literature DB >> 18674684

A treatment planning investigation into the dosimetric effects of systematic prostate patient rotational set-up errors.

Gavin Cranmer-Sargison1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential dosimetric effects of systematic rotational setup errors on prostate patients planned according to the RTOG P-0126 protocol, and to identify rotational tolerances about either the anterior-posterior (AP) or left-right (LR) axis, under which no correction in setup is required. Eight 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) treatment plans were included in the study, half planned to give 7020 cGy in 39 fractions (P-0126 Arm 1) and the other half planned to give 7920 cGy in 44 fractions (P-0126 Arm 2). Systematic rotations of the pelvic anatomy were simulated in a commercial treatment planning system by rotating opposing apertures in the opposite direction to the simulated anatomy rotation. Rotations were incremented in steps of 2.5 degrees to a maximum of +/-5.0 degrees and +/-10.0 degrees about the AP and LR axis respectively. Dose distributions were evaluated with respect to the planning objectives set out in the P-0126 protocol. For patients on Arm 2 of the study, maintaining the prescribed dose to 98% of the PTV was found to be problematic for superior-end-posterior rotations beyond 5.0 degrees . The results also show that maintaining a rectal dose less than 7500 cGy to 15% of the volume can become problematic for cases of small rectal volume and large superior-end-anterior rotations. We found that setting rotational tolerances will depend on which Arm of the protocol the patient is, and how well the initial plan meets the protocol objectives. In general, we conclude that for rotations about the AP axis, no tolerance level is required; however, cases presenting extreme rotations should be investigated as routine practice. For rotations about the LR axis, we conclude that a tolerance level for patients on Arm 2 of the protocol should be set at +/-5.0 degrees . This tolerance represents the systematic setup error which would require correction if a variation to the initial plan was deemed unacceptable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18674684     DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2007.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  6 in total

1.  A simulation technique for computation of the dosimetric effects of setup, organ motion and delineation uncertainties in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Bongile Mzenda; Mir Hosseini-Ashrafi; Antony Palmer; Honghai Liu; David J Brown
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Impact of pitch angle setup error and setup error correction on dose distribution in volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Akihiro Takemura; Kumiko Togawa; Tomohiro Yokoi; Shinichi Ueda; Kimiya Noto; Hironori Kojima; Naoki Isomura; Tomoyasu Kumano
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-02-12

3.  The dosimetric impact of prostate rotations during electromagnetically guided external-beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  Hanan Amro; Daniel A Hamstra; Daniel L Mcshan; Howard Sandler; Karen Vineberg; Scott Hadley; Dale Litzenberg
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Practical method of adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer using real-time electromagnetic tracking.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Olsen; Camille E Noel; Kenneth Baker; Lakshmi Santanam; Jeff M Michalski; Parag J Parikh
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Prostate rotation detected from implanted markers can affect dose coverage and cannot be simply dismissed.

Authors:  Qingyang Shang; Lawrence J Sheplan Olsen; Kevin Stephans; Rahul Tendulkar; Ping Xia
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  The effect of interfraction prostate motion on IMRT plans: a dose-volume histogram analysis using a Gaussian error function model.

Authors:  James C L Chow; Runqing Jiang; Daniel Markel
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.