Literature DB >> 18674550

(+/-)-3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine treatment in adult rats impairs path integration learning: a comparison of single vs once per week treatment for 5 weeks.

Matthew R Skelton1, Jessica A Able, Curtis E Grace, Nicole R Herring, Tori L Schaefer, Gary A Gudelsky, Charles V Vorhees, Michael T Williams.   

Abstract

3,4-Methlylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) administration (4 x 15 mg/kg) on a single day has been shown to cause path integration deficits in rats. While most animal experiments focus on single binge-type models of MDMA use, many MDMA users take the drug on a recurring basis. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of repeated single-day treatments with MDMA (4 x 15 mg/kg) once weekly for 5 weeks to animals that only received MDMA on week 5 and saline on weeks 1-4. In animals treated with MDMA for 5 weeks, there was an increase in time spent in the open area of the elevated zero maze suggesting a decrease in anxiety or increase in impulsivity compared to the animals given MDMA for 1 week and saline treated controls. Regardless of dosing regimen, MDMA treatment produced path integration deficits as evidenced by an increase in latency to find the goal in the Cincinnati water maze. Animals treated with MDMA also showed a transient hypoactivity that was not present when the animals were re-tested at the end of cognitive testing. In addition, both MDMA-treated groups showed comparable hyperactive responses to a later methamphetamine challenge. No differences were observed in spatial learning in the Morris water maze during acquisition or reversal but MDMA-related deficits were seen on reduced platform-size trials. Taken together, the data show that a single-day regimen of MDMA induces deficits similar to that of multiple weekly treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18674550      PMCID: PMC2703563          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropharmacology        ISSN: 0028-3908            Impact factor:   5.250


  57 in total

Review 1.  The anatomical and computational basis of the rat head-direction cell signal.

Authors:  P E Sharp; H T Blair; J Cho
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Neurological and psychopathological sequelae associated with a lifetime intake of 40,000 ecstasy tablets.

Authors:  Christos Kouimtsidis; Fabrizio Schifano; Tim Sharp; Lisa Ford; Justin Robinson; Colm Magee
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.386

Review 3.  MDMA use and neurocognition: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Ari D Kalechstein; Richard De La Garza; James J Mahoney; William E Fantegrossi; Thomas F Newton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Increased anxiety and impaired memory in rats 3 months after administration of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine ("ecstasy").

Authors:  K C Morley; J E Gallate; G E Hunt; P E Mallet; I S McGregor
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2001-12-14       Impact factor: 4.432

5.  High-dose MDMA does not result in long-term changes in impulsivity in the rat.

Authors:  Kathryn S Saadat; J Martin Elliott; A Richard Green; Paula M Moran
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Treatment with MDMA from P11-20 disrupts spatial learning and path integration learning in adolescent rats but only spatial learning in older rats.

Authors:  Matthew R Skelton; Michael T Williams; Charles V Vorhees
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Methamphetamine exposure from postnatal day 11 to 20 causes impairments in both behavioral strategies and spatial learning in adult rats.

Authors:  Michael T Williams; Charles V Vorhees; Francis Boon; Andrea J Saber; Donald P Cain
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2002-12-27       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Learning and memory after neonatal exposure to 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy) in rats: interaction with exposure in adulthood.

Authors:  Martha A Cohen; Matthew R Skelton; Tori L Schaefer; Gary A Gudelsky; Charles V Vorhees; Michael T Williams
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 2.562

9.  Recreational use of "ecstasy" (MDMA) is associated with elevated impulsivity.

Authors:  M J Morgan
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Biochemical and histological evidence that methylenedioxymethylamphetamine (MDMA) is toxic to neurons in the rat brain.

Authors:  D L Commins; G Vosmer; R M Virus; W L Woolverton; C R Schuster; L S Seiden
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 4.030

View more
  16 in total

1.  (±)3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine ("ecstasy") treatment modulates expression of neurotrophins and their receptors in multiple regions of adult rat brain.

Authors:  Ann M Hemmerle; Jonathan W Dickerson; Nicole R Herring; Tori L Schaefer; Charles V Vorhees; Michael T Williams; Kim B Seroogy
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Acute concomitant effects of MDMA binge dosing on extracellular 5-HT, locomotion and body temperature and the long-term effect on novel object discrimination in rats.

Authors:  Ratchanee Rodsiri; Clare Spicer; A Richard Green; Charles A Marsden; Kevin C F Fone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Electroencephalographic and convulsive effects of binge doses of (+)-methamphetamine, 5-methoxydiisopropyltryptamine, and (±)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine in rats.

Authors:  Devon L Graham; Nicole R Herring; Tori L Schaefer; Katherine D Holland; Charles V Vorhees; Michael T Williams
Journal:  Open Neuropsychopharmacol J       Date:  2012

4.  The intriguing effects of ecstasy (MDMA) on cognitive function in mice subjected to a minimal traumatic brain injury (mTBI).

Authors:  Shahaf Edut; Vardit Rubovitch; Shaul Schreiber; Chaim G Pick
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Comparison of (+)-methamphetamine, ±-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, (+)-amphetamine and ±-fenfluramine in rats on egocentric learning in the Cincinnati water maze.

Authors:  Charles V Vorhees; Elizabeth He; Matthew R Skelton; Devon L Graham; Tori L Schaefer; Curtis E Grace; Amanda A Braun; Robyn Amos-Kroohs; Michael T Williams
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 2.562

6.  MDMA enhances hippocampal-dependent learning and memory under restrictive conditions, and modifies hippocampal spine density.

Authors:  Sònia Abad; Alberto Fole; Nuria del Olmo; David Pubill; Mercè Pallàs; Fèlix Junyent; Jorge Camarasa; Antonio Camins; Elena Escubedo
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Neonatal methylphenidate does not impair adult spatial learning in the Morris water maze in rats.

Authors:  Robyn M Amos-Kroohs; Michael T Williams; Charles V Vorhees
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Distinct roles of methamphetamine in modulating spatial memory consolidation, retrieval, reconsolidation and the accompanying changes of ERK and CREB activation in hippocampus and prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Guofen Cao; Jie Zhu; Qing Zhong; Chaofeng Shi; Yonghui Dang; Wei Han; Xinshe Liu; Ming Xu; Teng Chen
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 5.250

9.  Effects of MDMA on olfactory memory and reversal learning in rats.

Authors:  Andrew Hawkey; L Brooke April; Mark Galizio
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 10.  Cincinnati water maze: A review of the development, methods, and evidence as a test of egocentric learning and memory.

Authors:  Charles V Vorhees; Michael T Williams
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.763

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.